ImageImageImageImageImage

What about JT at C?

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

KF10
Forum Mod - Kings
Forum Mod - Kings
Posts: 25,434
And1: 5,537
Joined: Jul 28, 2006
 

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#21 » by KF10 » Thu May 14, 2009 6:41 am

murray wrote:Ya I will agree to that, but compared to Hedo or any of the other small forwards that cdt3 was talking about he absolutely gets left behind. He is a great ball handler for a PF/C, but would be the worst ball handling starting SF in the league.


Ok, fair enough, agreed. If Jason started at the SF, he would be a below average to average ball handler compare to other SFs. But I do think that we can play Thompson at the SF for spot minutes like we usually did throughout the season though. But I won't really consider him starting the SF.
murray
Banned User
Posts: 505
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Location: laughing at the nerds with power.
Contact:

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#22 » by murray » Thu May 14, 2009 6:44 am

I just dont understand how you can classify JT as a good defender. IMO we had no one on our front line that is currently a good defender, but both bigs were works in progress. Im sorry but JT does nothing spectacular. He has no niche in the game. He is a role player. Griffin and Hawes do and will have that niche. I hope the best for JT, but laugh at the idea of him playing center instead of Hawes.
murray
Banned User
Posts: 505
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Location: laughing at the nerds with power.
Contact:

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#23 » by murray » Thu May 14, 2009 6:48 am

kingsfan10 wrote:
murray wrote:Ya I will agree to that, but compared to Hedo or any of the other small forwards that cdt3 was talking about he absolutely gets left behind. He is a great ball handler for a PF/C, but would be the worst ball handling starting SF in the league.


Ok, fair enough, agreed. If Jason started at the SF, he would be a below average to average ball handler compare to other SFs. But I do think that we can play Thompson at the SF for spot minutes like we usually did throughout the season though. But I won't really consider him starting the SF.


Agreed. I have no problem with JT playing minutes at the SF, but not against teams with a Kevin Durant type player that will destroy JT on the offensive end.
User avatar
Wolfay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,656
And1: 649
Joined: Aug 13, 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
       

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#24 » by Wolfay » Thu May 14, 2009 7:15 am

Jason will be awesome, but in defense of Hawes, I've seen Jason get way more intimidated than Hawes and Hawes actually played pretty well against the likes of Shaq and Yao during the second half of the season. With or without Griffin, we have a solid frontcourt for years to come and I think it would be foolish to trade anyone.
Image
murray
Banned User
Posts: 505
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Location: laughing at the nerds with power.
Contact:

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#25 » by murray » Thu May 14, 2009 4:12 pm

Wolfay wrote:Jason will be awesome, but in defense of Hawes, I've seen Jason get way more intimidated than Hawes and Hawes actually played pretty well against the likes of Shaq and Yao during the second half of the season. With or without Griffin, we have a solid frontcourt for years to come and I think it would be foolish to trade anyone.


He had a monster game against gasol too. IMO Hawes has a good developing inside outside game based on finess. I really do not see that from JT. He lacks any sort of post move, like a hook or anything. He scores inside off offensive rebounds mainly. And he is a decent midrange shooter, but again nothing spectacular like Hawes.

I still think it is funny that someone was complaining when I compared JT to Scola in terms of role. If anyone knows where that thread is please let me know.
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#26 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Thu May 14, 2009 6:39 pm

murray wrote:
Wolfay wrote:Jason will be awesome, but in defense of Hawes, I've seen Jason get way more intimidated than Hawes and Hawes actually played pretty well against the likes of Shaq and Yao during the second half of the season. With or without Griffin, we have a solid frontcourt for years to come and I think it would be foolish to trade anyone.


He had a monster game against gasol too. IMO Hawes has a good developing inside outside game based on finess. I really do not see that from JT. He lacks any sort of post move, like a hook or anything. He scores inside off offensive rebounds mainly. And he is a decent midrange shooter, but again nothing spectacular like Hawes.

I still think it is funny that someone was complaining when I compared JT to Scola in terms of role. If anyone knows where that thread is please let me know.


I think a realistic opinion of Thompson (not optimistic but not pessimistic) is a rich man's Scola.
BMiller52
RealGM
Posts: 10,403
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: my house

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#27 » by BMiller52 » Thu May 14, 2009 8:43 pm

Nicky Nix Nook wrote:
murray wrote:
Wolfay wrote:Jason will be awesome, but in defense of Hawes, I've seen Jason get way more intimidated than Hawes and Hawes actually played pretty well against the likes of Shaq and Yao during the second half of the season. With or without Griffin, we have a solid frontcourt for years to come and I think it would be foolish to trade anyone.


He had a monster game against gasol too. IMO Hawes has a good developing inside outside game based on finess. I really do not see that from JT. He lacks any sort of post move, like a hook or anything. He scores inside off offensive rebounds mainly. And he is a decent midrange shooter, but again nothing spectacular like Hawes.

I still think it is funny that someone was complaining when I compared JT to Scola in terms of role. If anyone knows where that thread is please let me know.


I think a realistic opinion of Thompson (not optimistic but not pessimistic) is a rich man's Scola.



He reminds me a lot more of a young Rasheed Wallace.
Image
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#28 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Thu May 14, 2009 8:52 pm

^^^I would say that a little on the optimistic side but entirely possible.
murray
Banned User
Posts: 505
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Location: laughing at the nerds with power.
Contact:

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#29 » by murray » Thu May 14, 2009 10:47 pm

^^^^ seriously. Young Rasheed was a superstar.
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#30 » by pillwenney » Thu May 14, 2009 11:43 pm

murray wrote:
He had a monster game against gasol too. IMO Hawes has a good developing inside outside game based on finess. I really do not see that from JT. He lacks any sort of post move, like a hook or anything. He scores inside off offensive rebounds mainly. And he is a decent midrange shooter, but again nothing spectacular like Hawes.


Jason didn't really have much of a post game coming into the league like Spencer--like others said, this can be blamed a lot on his status as a late bloomer (since most perimeter players obviously don't develop a post game). But he has shown great foot speed for his size, and seems to be developing some hints of a post game as well. I would also say they are close to the same from mid-range (although Spencer obviously has more range). Jason is the clearly more efficient scorer right now, and that's more of a knock on Spencer than anything. Again, Spencer has a lot of room to grow here, but that's something he really needs to work on. Right now, Jason is clearly better in this area.
BMiller52
RealGM
Posts: 10,403
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: my house

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#31 » by BMiller52 » Fri May 15, 2009 12:47 am

murray wrote:^^^^ seriously. Young Rasheed was a superstar.

No actually he wasn't: http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... ara01.html

JT actually had better rookie numbers at about the same age, to the tune of about 2 more PPG and 3 more RPG. You're just making young Sheed out to be a superstar so Thompson will pale in the comparison.
Image
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#32 » by SacKingZZZ » Fri May 15, 2009 6:44 am

mitchweber wrote:Jason didn't really have much of a post game coming into the league like Spencer--like others said, this can be blamed a lot on his status as a late bloomer (since most perimeter players obviously don't develop a post game). But he has shown great foot speed for his size, and seems to be developing some hints of a post game as well. I would also say they are close to the same from mid-range (although Spencer obviously has more range). Jason is the clearly more efficient scorer right now, and that's more of a knock on Spencer than anything. Again, Spencer has a lot of room to grow here, but that's something he really needs to work on. Right now, Jason is clearly better in this area.



Not just more range, Spencer has the unique ability to shoot from just about anywhere on the floor. Not even a lot of guards can do that. Jason really looks to be more of a spot up shooter a la Brad Miller.
murray
Banned User
Posts: 505
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Location: laughing at the nerds with power.
Contact:

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#33 » by murray » Fri May 15, 2009 11:46 pm

BMiller52 wrote:
murray wrote:^^^^ seriously. Young Rasheed was a superstar.

No actually he wasn't: http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... ara01.html

JT actually had better rookie numbers at about the same age, to the tune of about 2 more PPG and 3 more RPG. You're just making young Sheed out to be a superstar so Thompson will pale in the comparison.


Sheed has never been a big scorer or rebounder. Thats not the game he plays. He is a well rounded player capable of outside, inside, and defense.
murray
Banned User
Posts: 505
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Location: laughing at the nerds with power.
Contact:

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#34 » by murray » Fri May 15, 2009 11:48 pm

SacKingZZZ wrote:
mitchweber wrote:Jason didn't really have much of a post game coming into the league like Spencer--like others said, this can be blamed a lot on his status as a late bloomer (since most perimeter players obviously don't develop a post game). But he has shown great foot speed for his size, and seems to be developing some hints of a post game as well. I would also say they are close to the same from mid-range (although Spencer obviously has more range). Jason is the clearly more efficient scorer right now, and that's more of a knock on Spencer than anything. Again, Spencer has a lot of room to grow here, but that's something he really needs to work on. Right now, Jason is clearly better in this area.



Not just more range, Spencer has the unique ability to shoot from just about anywhere on the floor. Not even a lot of guards can do that. Jason really looks to be more of a spot up shooter a la Brad Miller.


Spencer could go down as one of, if not the greatest shooting Center of all time. I mean you have Okur, Big Z, Sabonis, and a few others, but he could become the greatest shooter of all of them.
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#35 » by pillwenney » Sat May 16, 2009 12:31 am

SacKingZZZ wrote:
Not just more range, Spencer has the unique ability to shoot from just about anywhere on the floor. Not even a lot of guards can do that. Jason really looks to be more of a spot up shooter a la Brad Miller.


True, but he's also pretty inconsistent right now, and that is probably partly to blame.

murray wrote:
Sheed has never been a big scorer or rebounder. Thats not the game he plays. He is a well rounded player capable of outside, inside, and defense.


So...in other words, not a superstar at all.
BMiller52
RealGM
Posts: 10,403
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: my house

Re: What about JT at C? 

Post#36 » by BMiller52 » Sat May 16, 2009 8:15 am

mitchweber wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:
Not just more range, Spencer has the unique ability to shoot from just about anywhere on the floor. Not even a lot of guards can do that. Jason really looks to be more of a spot up shooter a la Brad Miller.


True, but he's also pretty inconsistent right now, and that is probably partly to blame.

murray wrote:
Sheed has never been a big scorer or rebounder. Thats not the game he plays. He is a well rounded player capable of outside, inside, and defense.


So...in other words, not a superstar at all.



THANK YOU. That is my whole freakin point. Yea he's not a superstar, but he turned out to be a damn important player on a title team. So that's why I made the comparison to JT. But I think JT has a better chance to be a 20/10 C. Like what Sheed was supposed to be. And if murray says JT's J sucks again that is flat out wrong. He has nice range out to 18 feet.
Image

Return to Sacramento Kings