thebirdman wrote:The problem is when we go to Pierce isos and that is pretty much 80% of time in last 2 minutes. If basketball is in Paul`s hand there is no need for Rondo to be in the game...
That IS the problem.
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
thebirdman wrote:The problem is when we go to Pierce isos and that is pretty much 80% of time in last 2 minutes. If basketball is in Paul`s hand there is no need for Rondo to be in the game...
wigglestrue wrote:thebirdman wrote:The problem is when we go to Pierce isos and that is pretty much 80% of time in last 2 minutes. If basketball is in Paul`s hand there is no need for Rondo to be in the game...
That IS the problem.
JR Hawks wrote:
My intent is not to make a fool of you, Floyd.
wigglestrue wrote:I suggest you research that "track record". Volume is not enough. Besides the pretty solid but totally predictable elbow fadeaway, what does Pierce provide at the end of games? That pass to Baby in Game 4 was an anomaly. Those missed free throws in Game 6 weren't as anomalous. And free throws only come when a foul is called, which often doesn't happen on those rare times when he's aggressive and drives to the hoop. He gets tripped up or picked when he dribbles too much, which is usually. So besides the fact that Pierce always has the ball at the end of games and by default has produced many memorable moments over the last decade (the good outnumbered by the whiffs which aren't as memorable), why does Pierce always have the ball at the end of games? That's the deeper issue, not this Rondo crap. Dumping the ball to Pierce mostly fails, and even when it works it comes at the expense of the offense's flow, at the expense of the other players' rhythm.
.