Jerry Bruckheimer wants to buy the Kings???

Smills91 · Post #1 » by **Smills91** » Mon May 18, 2009 4:01 pm

via wiretap.

Whoa, that came out of Right Field....does he want to buy the Kings to relocate them???

murray · Post #2 » by **murray** » Mon May 18, 2009 4:37 pm

There would be a lot of CSI plugs during the game... I really think this move would be made to attempt to move the team to vegas, but I also doubt the NBA would allow a team in that city. Bruckheimer has shown an interest in buying a team, and sure has the money for it. Maybe he could buy his own damn stadium in Sac.

KM44 · Post #3 » by **KM44** » Mon May 18, 2009 4:51 pm

I would be so unbelievably happy. I hate the maloofs and they are the epitome of poor ownership of a sports franchise (next to cuban). I wouldn't even care if they moved. They would still be the team I love, and they would finally have an opportunity to be a class franchise and not a white trash franchise.

BMiller52 · Post #4 » by **BMiller52** » Mon May 18, 2009 5:04 pm

I hope he wouldn't want to move the team. But I really hope the Maloofs can get an arena here in Sac. I would be heart broken if the kings left. Anyone know more about this bruckheimer guy?

Smills91 · Post #5 » by **Smills91** » Mon May 18, 2009 5:04 pm

KM44 wrote:I would be so unbelievably happy. I hate the maloofs and they are the epitome of poor ownership of a sports franchise (next to cuban). I wouldn't even care if they moved. They would still be the team I love, and they would finally have an opportunity to be a class franchise and not a white trash franchise.

I don't see Bruckheimer keeping the Kings in Sacramento...

JSrose115 · Post #6 » by **JSrose115** » Mon May 18, 2009 5:06 pm

probably do a better job then what the maloofs are doing now.

KM44 · Post #7 » by **KM44** » Mon May 18, 2009 5:08 pm

Smills91 wrote: I don't see Bruckheimer keeping the Kings in Sacramento...

I don't really care. I would still be a kings fan. Plus I'm moving... Haha, so I don't really care.

murray · Post #8 » by **murray** » Mon May 18, 2009 5:21 pm

KM44 wrote:
Smills91 wrote: I don't see Bruckheimer keeping the Kings in Sacramento...

I don't really care. I would still be a kings fan. Plus I'm moving... Haha, so I don't really care.

Dude you just lost a lot of respect from me with those comments. I am moving to SD, but still would be heartbroken if the Kings left Sac. Its comments like that that make me sick.

cdt3 · Post #9 » by **cdt3** » Mon May 18, 2009 5:27 pm

Where would he move them in Cali? The whole state is struggling financially right now. The only place with a worse housing market than Cali is Las Vegas where 67% of homes owners are underwater in their mortgages (including the Maloofs properties). I just don't see any move. They would have to be the third team in socal or 2nd team in norcal the same as Al Davis came back crying to Oakland after trying this in the NFL. We need to build a stadium but will not happen until the budget here is straightened out.

KM44 · Post #10 » by **KM44** » Mon May 18, 2009 5:41 pm

murray wrote:
KM44 wrote:
Smills91 wrote: I don't see Bruckheimer keeping the Kings in Sacramento...

I don't really care. I would still be a kings fan. Plus I'm moving... So I don't really care.

Dude you just lost a lot of respect from me with those comments. I am moving to SD, but still would be heartbroken if the Kings left Sac. Its comments like that that make me sick.

A little sensative eh? Well this is all just a business, and I'm not saying that I want the kings to move, but if they do, they will still have a huge following. Just look at the boards. Seriously though, I wouldn't expect bruckheimer or anyone else to move the franchise because of the current economy, so I was just making light of the situation and not really reading into what I was saying. I'm sorry I offended you murray.

Post #11 » by **KF10** » Mon May 18, 2009 5:57 pm

Smills91 wrote:via wiretap.

Whoa, that came out of Right Field....does he want to buy the Kings to relocate them???

You should like him Smills, he is pro-McCain. He donated funds to the McCain campaign.

BMiller52 · Post #12 » by **BMiller52** » Mon May 18, 2009 6:21 pm

kingsfan10 wrote:
Smills91 wrote:via wiretap.

Whoa, that came out of Right Field....does he want to buy the Kings to relocate them???

You should like him Smills, he is pro-McCain. He donated funds to the McCain campaign.

I don't think Smills really agreed with McCain, I just think he hated him less than he hated Obama. That is kinda OT though.

Seriously though, does anyone know more about this guy? Does he have more dough than the Maloofs? Would he be interested in keeping the kings here? What do we know about him?

Post #13 » by **KingInExile** » Mon May 18, 2009 6:23 pm

Can we PLEASE not bring up politics?!?!

Smills91 · Post #14 » by **Smills91** » Mon May 18, 2009 6:24 pm

BMiller52 wrote:
kingsfan10 wrote:
Smills91 wrote:via wiretap.

Whoa, that came out of Right Field....does he want to buy the Kings to relocate them???

You should like him Smills, he is pro-McCain. He donated funds to the McCain campaign.

I don't think Smills really agreed with McCain, I just think he hated him less than he hated Obama. That is kinda OT though.

Seriously though, does anyone know more about this guy? Does he have more dough than the Maloofs? Would he be interested in keeping the kings here? What do we know about him?

McCain's a deusche. He's just less of a deusche than Obama.

And YES I'd say he's much more loaded than the Maloofs.

BMiller52 · Post #15 » by **BMiller52** » Mon May 18, 2009 6:30 pm

Smills91 wrote:
BMiller52 wrote:
kingsfan10 wrote:
You should like him Smills, he is pro-McCain. He donated funds to the McCain campaign.

I don't think Smills really agreed with McCain, I just think he hated him less than he hated Obama. That is kinda OT though.

Seriously though, does anyone know more about this guy? Does he have more dough than the Maloofs? Would he be interested in keeping the kings here? What do we know about him?

McCain's a deusche. He's just less of a deusche than Obama.

And YES I'd say he's much more loaded than the Maloofs.

So... now the only question is would he be interested in keeping the team in Sac. If we get the cal expo land, he could probably contribute a lot to an arena. I mean the cost of relocating is 100+ million dollars, that's the relocation fee IIRC. So if he contributed 150 mill to an arena, I think he could get it done. And that would be more profitable for him than moving the team to a floundering Las Vegas market or moving to the 3rd team in SoCal IMO. But I don't trust him because I don't know much about him, and I know the Maloofs have good intentions atleast. But is the guy even a kings fan at the moment, and are the Maloofs even willing to sell? This opens up a whole other can of worms.

edit: Found this in his wiki:

[edit] Sports ownership
Bruckheimer has been named as one of the investors of a new sports arena in Las Vegas, Nevada and has been rumored to be the leading choice by the National Hockey League to own an expansion hockey team that would play in the proposed arena

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Bruc ... al_success

Why in the hell would he want to move the team to LV? LV is a financial mess right now, that would be suicide.

Post #16 » by **KF10** » Mon May 18, 2009 6:36 pm

KingInExile wrote:Can we PLEASE not bring up politics?!?!

My apologies, KIE. It was a dumb comment from me, even though, I knew Smills wasn't into McCain. But I just had to do it though haha I never start any political tangent in a thread before. But I'm promise you that will be my last reference on random politics

murray · Post #17 » by **murray** » Mon May 18, 2009 7:10 pm

KM44 wrote:
A little sensative eh? Well this is all just a business, and I'm not saying that I want the kings to move, but if they do, they will still have a huge following. Just look at the boards. Seriously though, I wouldn't expect bruckheimer or anyone else to move the franchise because of the current economy, so I was just making light of the situation and not really reading into what I was saying. I'm sorry I offended you murray.

Back peddle much?

I wouldn't even care if they moved.

Yeah I am a little sensative about this. These are our Kings. These are Sacramento's Kings. If the kings leave, what does the town have? The rivercats? We need the kings, they are the last sports organization making Sacramento a relevant U.S city. Whether I am living in Sac or not, I want the Kings here at home.

Website · Post #18 » by **Nicky Nix Nook** » Mon May 18, 2009 7:25 pm

murray wrote:
KM44 wrote:
A little sensative eh? Well this is all just a business, and I'm not saying that I want the kings to move, but if they do, they will still have a huge following. Just look at the boards. Seriously though, I wouldn't expect bruckheimer or anyone else to move the franchise because of the current economy, so I was just making light of the situation and not really reading into what I was saying. I'm sorry I offended you murray.

Back peddle much?
I wouldn't even care if they moved.

Yeah I am a little sensative about this. These are our Kings. These are Sacramento's Kings. If the kings leave, what does the town have? The rivercats? We need the kings, they are the last sports organization making Sacramento a relevant U.S city. Whether I am living in Sac or not, I want the Kings here at home.

If the Kings left Sacramento that would be it. Sac would never have a ship. All those years when we failed would be just a memory and Sacramento would have no hope. Sorry to get dramatic but that would just be a travesty.

Post #19 » by **Wolfay** » Mon May 18, 2009 8:20 pm

If the Kings moved, I would stop watching basketball. There would be just no point for me.

Las Vegas Kings... sounds like crap.

Post #20 » by **ICMTM** » Mon May 18, 2009 9:35 pm

I would say if the Kings left I wouldn't be as big a fan! The main reason I like the Kings is because they are the home team. Can you really say you like this team right now? Heck no! I like my home team.

We'd get another team (may not be NBA) somehow and the Kings would be an afterthought.