ImageImage

Clayton: It will most likely be Lorenzen on Sunday

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,750
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Clayton: It will most likely be Lorenzen on Sunday 

Post#1 » by LUKE23 » Fri Sep 14, 2007 8:16 pm

Said he would be shocked if Eli played this week and that he really hasn't made any game-type throws in practice this week. Get ready for the Pilsbury Throw-Boy.

Put this guy on his back all game. He got sacked 12 times in preseason, and that was against 2nd/3rd strings (granted most likely with the 2nd/3rd OL as well).
User avatar
Ill-yasova
RealGM
Posts: 13,361
And1: 2,562
Joined: Jul 13, 2006

 

Post#2 » by Ill-yasova » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:51 pm

I know the pack doesn't blitz a lot, but I hope they make an exception this week.
User avatar
MadCityBucky
General Manager
Posts: 9,873
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 21, 2007

 

Post#3 » by MadCityBucky » Fri Sep 14, 2007 9:55 pm

Ill-yasova wrote:I know the pack doesn't blitz a lot, but I hope they make an exception this week.


Agreed. Just like you blitz rookie QB's, you should blitz a backup QB. Especially if they're not very good. Force them to make quick throws and create opportunities for interceptions.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,056
And1: 14,929
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Clayton: It will most likely be Lorenzen on Sunday 

Post#4 » by Ayt » Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:04 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Said he would be shocked if Eli played this week and that he really hasn't made any game-type throws in practice this week. Get ready for the Pilsbury Throw-Boy.

Put this guy on his back all game. He got sacked 12 times in preseason, and that was against 2nd/3rd strings (granted most likely with the 2nd/3rd OL as well).


7 of those sacks came in one game. Pretty remarkable.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

 

Post#5 » by El Duderino » Sat Sep 15, 2007 5:25 am

MadCityBucky wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Agreed. Just like you blitz rookie QB's, you should blitz a backup QB. Especially if they're not very good. Force them to make quick throws and create opportunities for interceptions.



We put quite a bit of pressure on the Eagles and their very good line without having to blitz alot.The Giants line isn't as good and i wouldn't blitz that much unless the front four can't create some havoc.

1.Blitzing does open up the chance for allowing a big play or two.Given the Packers aren't an explosive offense,make the Giants with a rookie QB and unproven RB try to put together 7-8-9-10-11 play drives without stalling out or turning it over vs maybe getting caught in a blitz or two that leads to a cheap long TD or more.

2.More guys back in coverage makes a rookie QB have to be very precise and has more defenders back to pick off a pass.


I'm not saying to never blitz,but i wouldn't get silly by doing it to often or by sending multiple blitzers on given plays which could lead to getting burned.Try to confuse him with a few zone blitzes and/or sending an extra guy here and there,but our front four should be good enough to not force us to take to many risky chances.Get burned in a blitz and give up say a 65 yard bomb and maybe one bad turnover by us,suddenly their crowd is in a frenzy and our offense is out of their comfort zone.

Preventing the big play was as big a reason as any as to why GB won the game vs the Eagles.

Return to Green Bay Packers