Mike Conley

Nash2Stoudemire · Post #1 » by **Nash2Stoudemire** » Wed May 20, 2009 4:33 am

Rubio is most likely going to Memphis, making MCJ expendable.

Would you guys be interested in him and what could we give up?

CraigDeuce · Post #2 » by **CraigDeuce** » Wed May 20, 2009 4:52 am

NOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Conley has shown nothing to prove he's going to be anywhere close to a top-level PG in this league.

YouTube · Post #3 » by **Kerrsed** » Wed May 20, 2009 6:33 am

The Clippers will trade Griffin to Memphis to get their PG of the future <--what they need
That will leave Memphis with a line-up of
Conley/Mayo/Gay/Griffin/Gasol <---- Pretty scary IMHO!

THIS WILL HAPPEN!

boshjonesford · Post #4 » by **boshjonesford** » Wed May 20, 2009 9:06 am

Kerrsed wrote:The Clippers will trade Griffin to Memphis to get their PG of the future <--what they need
That will leave Memphis with a line-up of
Conley/Mayo/Gay/Griffin/Gasol <---- Pretty scary IMHO!

THIS WILL HAPPEN!

THIS WONT HAPPEN

RaisingArizona · Post #5 » by **RaisingArizona** » Wed May 20, 2009 7:10 pm

Personally I'd love to have Mike Conley over Dragic; I'd rather have a lot of point guards over him.

Post #6 » by **TASTIC** » Wed May 20, 2009 7:15 pm

CraigDeuce wrote:NOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Conley has shown nothing to prove he's going to be anywhere close to a top-level PG in this league.

Yeah that's complete bull. The dude increased production massively over the second half
Post All Star 30 games 36mins 14.5pts 3.7reb 5.6asst 1.7stl 46%fg 43.5% 3pt 84%ft

So yeah. he's shown he can run a team, albeit one with shoddy pieces around him

Kerrsed wrote:The Clippers will trade Griffin to Memphis to get their PG of the future <--what they need
That will leave Memphis with a line-up of
Conley/Mayo/Gay/Griffin/Gasol <---- Pretty scary IMHO!

THIS WILL HAPPEN!

Ha. yeah not happening

Post #7 » by **rsavaj** » Wed May 20, 2009 7:31 pm

I'm down with Conley. I'd even trade the 14th pick for him.

Post #8 » by **TASTIC** » Wed May 20, 2009 8:44 pm

^I wouldn't think twice about moving the #14 for him...I'd throw in Tucker and ask for Ross back too

harshey1388 · Post #9 » by **harshey1388** » Wed May 20, 2009 10:16 pm

TASTIC wrote:^I wouldn't think twice about moving the #14 for him...I'd throw in Tucker and ask for Ross back too

i like it. ross and conley would be great additions, but i see them as more offensive threats rather than the defensive route we are "saying" we're doing. not like alando is a great defensive player either haha

Post #10 » by **TASTIC** » Wed May 20, 2009 11:15 pm

Ross!!?? he's an elite perimeter defender...definitely defensive minded over offense...

harshey1388 · Post #11 » by **harshey1388** » Wed May 20, 2009 11:41 pm

okie haha my bad then i thought he was a spark off the bench offensively ha

ruiner · Post #12 » by **ruiner** » Thu May 21, 2009 12:34 am

I'd rather use the #14 pick on Flynn, or Jennings, Teague, or Maynor than any kind of trade for Conley.

Post #13 » by **TASTIC** » Thu May 21, 2009 12:39 am

^You'd SERIOUSLY pass on Conley - in his 3rd year - over ANY of those guys?

If Conley were drafted now, he'd be on par with Rubio, no doubt.

ruiner · Post #14 » by **ruiner** » Thu May 21, 2009 1:00 am

I just don't think much of Conley. There's not much progression there, andd a solid or good 2nd half season in his 3rd yr isn't showing me much regardless of who is around him. I'd take my chances on those guys (especially Flynn/Jennings) if we do go PG. I didn't even like him when he was coming out, I'd certaintly take Rubio over him. If they do deal Conley to draft another, that might just show what they actually think about him.

Post #15 » by **TASTIC** » Thu May 21, 2009 1:09 am

^That's true...I think they draft Rubio and keep them together as learns under Conley

I really like Jennings from what I've seen...would love him here

nanoclarkology · Post #16 » by **nanoclarkology** » Thu May 21, 2009 3:51 am

IMO I think Rubio would end up starting over Conley. But we will see what happens.

JohnVancouver · Post #17 » by **JohnVancouver** » Thu May 21, 2009 7:51 pm

TASTIC wrote:^You'd SERIOUSLY pass on Conley - in his 3rd year - over ANY of those guys?

If Conley were drafted now, he'd be on par with Rubio, no doubt.

--- Really? I respect your opinion, and haven't watched Conley much at all but I'd got the impression he was just okay, but no-one special. I do recall that mid-season the coach kind of decided to give him the team to run and see if he was the guy they wanted. I take it he did well.
Tell you what - Houston has sure drafted nicely they last few years. Scola, Landry, Brooks. Them and Utah always have a strong team, and add quality young guys. Why can't we ... he asked rhetorically.

Post #18 » by **rsavaj** » Thu May 21, 2009 7:53 pm

I'd take Rubio as a 16 year old over Conley right now :-D

Post #19 » by **TASTIC** » Thu May 21, 2009 8:02 pm

^haha

You sir are a ghey pervert

Conley's underrated...I've probably overrated him a bit...I just think for the number of FAIL lottery picks we've seen, you could do a lot worse than Mike Conley for the 14th pick...

RaisingArizona · Post #20 » by **RaisingArizona** » Fri May 22, 2009 12:56 am

TASTIC wrote:^haha

You sir are a ghey pervert

Conley's underrated...I've probably overrated him a bit...I just think for the number of FAIL lottery picks we've seen, you could do a lot worse than Mike Conley for the 14th pick...

Conley resembles a young kj. He was also a top 5 pick in a better draft class than this year is; he's only in his 3rd season. I don't see how people are not even giving him a chance.