MN - NJ Trade

Dandy · Post #1 » by **Dandy** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:11 am

Min Gives:
Jefferson, Miller(exp), Foye(exp), #18

NJ Gives:
Harris, Simmons(exp), Yi, Boone, #11

Min Roster (#6,#11,#28 picks)
C- Boone
PF- Love, Yi, Smith(exp), Cardinal(exp)
SF - Gomes, Simmons(exp)
SG - Brewer
PG - Harris, Telfair

NJ Roster (#18 picks)
C- Lopez
PF- Jefferson, Anderson
SF- Miller, Hayes
SG- Carter, Hassell
PG- Foye

MN Die Hard · Post #2 » by **MN Die Hard** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:20 am

Wow that is really, really bad for MN.

cpfsf · Post #3 » by **cpfsf** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:29 am

I don't like our new lineup, I'm really don't like the fact we are throwing Miller instead of Cardinal

Krapinsky · Post #4 » by **Krapinsky** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:29 am

not very dandy

collin_k41 · Post #5 » by **collin_k41** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:35 am

Ya I think it would be unanimous that that is one nasty trade..

Jefferson>>Harris
Miller+his expiring contract>>>Simmons
Foye=>Yi
Boone and #11 don't even come close to making up the difference. Nice try, but this blows..

dunkonu21 · Post #6 » by **dunkonu21** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:36 am

Man Devin Harris is a great player. I totally I'm interested in him. I am the kid who never wants to trade Jefferson. I still don't think I could pull the trigger. But It's fun to think about!

john2jer · Post #7 » by **john2jer** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:37 am

Brutal.

dunkonu21 · Post #8 » by **dunkonu21** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:38 am

Draft Mullens, Earl Clark and Derozan/Harden.

Harris
Derozan
Clark/Yi
Love
Boone/Mullens

That is a lot more clear of a direction than we are going in now. But obv it's not the best value we'd need more.

john2jer · Post #9 » by **john2jer** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:54 am

We still don't have a #1 option. Even if value was good, the fit isn't right.

4ho5ive · Post #10 » by **4ho5ive** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:07 am

Devin Harris looked awesome last year, however, i think his play was inflated by having a green light to basically do what he wanted. Jefferson is far better value wise, though i would be very interested in pairing them together here.

Post #11 » by **Klomp** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:34 am

dunkonu21 wrote: I totally I'm interested in him!

But you call out rev and his child porn antics?

EDIT: Nevermind, it was devilz

john2jer · Post #12 » by **john2jer** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:48 am

dunkonu21 wrote:Man...is great...I totally I'm interested in...the kid who...I still..think...about!

I think that's what Klomp was going for...

Esohny · Post #13 » by **Esohny** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:04 am

I think we'd need to get Lopez just to START balancing the scales on that one.

GopherIt! · Post #14 » by **GopherIt!** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:12 am

this trade breaks the third rule of Foye Club.

4ho5ive · Post #15 » by **4ho5ive** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:14 am

Man you really have to watch what you say around here.

karch34 · Post #16 » by **karch34** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:31 am

We give up too much. Even if you think Jefferson and Harris are equal value (which I don't but with Love you can at least argue moving a Jefferson for PG like Harris).

The rest of the deal is then Miller(exp), Foye(exp), #18 for Simmons(exp), Yi, Boone, #11. I think Miller and Foye are more valuable than any of those other guys alone and definitely not worth moving up 7 spots.

wolves_fan_82au · Post #17 » by **wolves_fan_82au** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:58 am

swap miller with cardinal and dont put in foye and the #18 and it might be closer

oh and than add in lopez :wink:

southern wolf · Post #18 » by **southern wolf** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:26 am

Apart from Harris and Lopez, I don’t have much interest in the Nets as a trading partner… Carter’s not going to help in the long run.

big3_8_19_21 · Post #19 » by **big3_8_19_21** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:53 am

I'd offer a package based on Love picks and expirings...not one including Jefferson at all.

Why am I seemingly seeing Harris' name come up in a significant amount of trade discussion? Granted it's just RealGM banter, but is there a reason for this like an article that came out or what?

shrink · Post #20 » by **shrink** » Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:00 pm

Its frustrating will all the possibilities of small deals that would be good for both teams, that this is what the NJN fans bring to our boards.