WTFsunsFTW wrote:Dwight Howard is a max player, period, and here's the crazy part: he gets better every year, and his flaws are blatant enough to be fixed with relative ease.
Is it safe for me to infer that WTF means offensively, since he is the defensive player of the year. Is it also safe for me to infer he means at the FT line as well, because that is another WEAK aspect of his game. Okay then, I will.
Is it easier to learn to play defense in the NBA (all things relative) or offense?? I have never seen anyone come in the league limited in total offensive skill set ie, dribbling, quickness, smoothness, moves, shooting and a natural feel for the game, then learn how to be an effective force offensively. For example, Dennis Rodman, Bruce Bowen and Ben Wallace. I haven't seen very many, if any poor FT shooters go from a 50%+ shooter to an 80% plus shooter after 5yrs. They are pretty much what they are.
I have seen players decide to give more EFFORT defensively and become very good defensive player, such as Ray Allen and Paul Pierce. So you could call it common sense based off of observed data, but I do think a player can reach his defensive of level easier than his offensive level. That being the case
You are wrong...MOMMA IS RIGHT!
BTW, let me see him come back from micro fracture surgery, improve from a 60% ft to an 84% ft'r and develope a 20 jumper that is butter!! Then we can about the "crazy" part.
The question is, what skill set is easier to improve, Offense or Defense (In basketball) and why do you feel that way?
They way most players are payed would imply offense is more valued, because it is more difficult to develope. But hey what is your opinion?