Image Image Image Image

If the Over/Under on Hester Touchdowns was 8?

Moderator: chitownsports4ever

User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

If the Over/Under on Hester Touchdowns was 8? 

Post#1 » by emperorjones » Thu Aug 9, 2007 8:15 pm

If the Over/Under for Hester touchdowns was set at 8 for the regular season would you go over or under?

I'd go over.
User avatar
UrbanLegendMD
General Manager
Posts: 8,716
And1: 11
Joined: Jul 30, 2004
Location: Pilsen

 

Post#2 » by UrbanLegendMD » Thu Aug 9, 2007 8:17 pm

under. 8 is just too much. if he gets 4 on offense it's a good season.
First the federal government borrowed money; then gave the money to Bank of America; then I borrowed some of that money from Bank of America and gave it to the federal government; then the federal government gave the money back to Bank of America.
User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

 

Post#3 » by emperorjones » Thu Aug 9, 2007 8:18 pm

I think 4 on returns and (taking a sip from my bears koolaide) 5 on offense.
User avatar
Sinistar6
Starter
Posts: 2,352
And1: 133
Joined: Nov 18, 2003
Location: Chicago
       

 

Post#4 » by Sinistar6 » Thu Aug 9, 2007 9:04 pm

under for 500 dollars.

5 or 6 would be the true betting line I think.
Next time the cult's spaceship lands we'll all be wearing black Starburys.

-mcwelk
User avatar
Demon2
Junior
Posts: 393
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL

 

Post#5 » by Demon2 » Thu Aug 9, 2007 9:06 pm

Under, 4 on offense would be solid + 2 on returns would make a worth while year.
Chicago 2016 Image
Image
User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

 

Post#6 » by emperorjones » Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:21 am

Sinistar6 wrote:under for 500 dollars.

5 or 6 would be the true betting line I think.


How can I lock this in? What you guys might be forgetting is that one of our top 3 receivers could go down. Then Hester would get much more playing time
Joe Jackson
Analyst
Posts: 3,694
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: Great plains - Big sky- dust bowl

 

Post#7 » by Joe Jackson » Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:56 am

Under
7 for the season. 3 or 4 each on offense and returns.

He might get more on offense if he played a lot, but I don't think he will.

And I think about 3 or 4 will be the max on returns this year. Teams will be game planning for him and kicking away from him alot.
He will have lots of exciting and good long returns but not as many scores.

7
dacheezwhiz
Rookie
Posts: 1,163
And1: 25
Joined: Aug 11, 2004

 

Post#8 » by dacheezwhiz » Fri Aug 10, 2007 4:27 am

under, he just can repeat that year especially with noone kicking it to him, i say 5 total with 2 or 3 from each, i hope im wrong though, go bears
User avatar
Dr. Lechter
Senior
Posts: 622
And1: 0
Joined: May 03, 2007
Location: Trying to eat better

 

Post#9 » by Dr. Lechter » Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:42 am

I say over Emp.

I think I'd reverse your guess and say five returns and four on offense.

Honestly, they're setting up pretty simple stuff for the kid. Zero routes so that he doens't have to remember where to go but just gets the ball in his hands fast. Probably will have some third down backfield and God knows what kind of reverse options they'll have.

So yes, over, but it's the NFL so who knows?
User avatar
IVSKIN
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,256
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 19, 2005

 

Post#10 » by IVSKIN » Fri Aug 10, 2007 6:07 am

Call me a pessimist, but I say he gets no more then 4. He will get two on offense, then 2 on Special Teams. This will still be a very solid season for him.
User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

 

Post#11 » by emperorjones » Fri Aug 10, 2007 6:57 am

This is why I think over:

last year Hester had 68 touches on returns (20 kickoff, 47 punts & that crazy FG). On those 68 touches he got 6 touchdowns. Now in these return situations every single opponent is focused on Hester. He has to make moves just to get a chance to get isolated against a few defenders.

On offense, he will get the ball in situations where only a handful or fewer defenders even have a shot at him. I think he'll get 30+ touches on offense this year (1-2 receptions + a reverse or a run). I think his breakaway ability will generate a higher % touchdown ratio on offense (5 TDs this year). I think he still has 3-4 TDs on punt returns and at least 1 on KOs.
CBS7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,564
And1: 4,191
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: Dallas

 

Post#12 » by CBS7 » Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:02 pm

Under, by a lot.

I'd say 4-6. 2-3 on returns and 2-3 on offense.
Cliff Levingston
RealGM
Posts: 22,667
And1: 1,094
Joined: May 29, 2003
Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
       

 

Post#13 » by Cliff Levingston » Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:42 pm

emperorjones wrote:This is why I think over:

last year Hester had 68 touches on returns (20 kickoff, 47 punts & that crazy FG). On those 68 touches he got 6 touchdowns. Now in these return situations every single opponent is focused on Hester. He has to make moves just to get a chance to get isolated against a few defenders.

On offense, he will get the ball in situations where only a handful or fewer defenders even have a shot at him. I think he'll get 30+ touches on offense this year (1-2 receptions + a reverse or a run). I think his breakaway ability will generate a higher % touchdown ratio on offense (5 TDs this year). I think he still has 3-4 TDs on punt returns and at least 1 on KOs.

No one is going to kick to him this season unless they absolutely have to for this very reason. Thus his value won't be in TD's but the stellar field position he helps us get.

Cliff Levingston will say 5, so definitely under. 2 offensive TD's and 3 return TD's. They're not going to use him a whole lot on offense especially at first.
User avatar
ChicagoTRS
Pro Prospect
Posts: 826
And1: 6
Joined: Jul 06, 2006

 

Post#14 » by ChicagoTRS » Sat Aug 11, 2007 3:42 am

I would put the lines at:
2 on returns
3.5 on offense
5.5 total

betting window open...
Image
User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

 

Post#15 » by emperorjones » Sat Aug 11, 2007 3:25 pm

^^ $100 on the over TRS.

Wooo Whoo big money. come on big money. momma need a new car!
Joe Jackson
Analyst
Posts: 3,694
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: Great plains - Big sky- dust bowl

 

Post#16 » by Joe Jackson » Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:47 pm

^^^another $100 on the over TRS.
User avatar
TylerB
Analyst
Posts: 3,181
And1: 98
Joined: Jun 15, 2003
Location: West Chicago

 

Post#17 » by TylerB » Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:21 am

Teams won't be kicking to him much this year.
User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

 

Post#18 » by emperorjones » Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:15 pm

:)

This guy is all-world when it comes to shaking defenders. I still say over.
User avatar
tclg
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,194
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2007
Location: Chicago

 

Post#19 » by tclg » Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:23 pm

I think under I dont think he is going to get kicked to after what happened to kansas city
User avatar
emperorjones
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 4,591
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 16, 2006

 

Post#20 » by emperorjones » Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:35 pm

I think players/coaches in the NFL are too macho to kick away from him all game. I think it goes against the nature of the game. Its been mentioned a few times how the Colts begged to kick to him & were all pumped up about it.

Return to Chicago Bears