ImageImageImage

Rondo for #6?

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

MN Die Hard
Analyst
Posts: 3,396
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Rondo for #6? 

Post#1 » by MN Die Hard » Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:45 pm

I'm sure there is no truth to this - why would Boston trade Rondo? - but if there were, I would certainly offer the sixth pick for him.

Tony (Boston,MA)
Do you see the Celtics making a trade for a draft pick? If so for who? Who would the Celtics be trading? I hope NOT Ray Allen!

Chad Ford
They are working it and a number of teams including the Grizzlies (no. 2), Thunder (no. 3), Wizards (no. 5), Raptors (no. 9) and Nets (No. 11) sound open to trading their pick. And they could probably get No. 4 if the Celtics were willing to put Rajon Rondo in the deal.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,895
And1: 1,069
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#2 » by Dewey » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:01 pm

THey can take Rondo and stick him where the sun don't shine. He is not very good with out Pierce, Allen and KG.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
the_bruce
Analyst
Posts: 3,536
And1: 57
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#3 » by the_bruce » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:05 pm

Ive never liked rondo
MN Die Hard
Analyst
Posts: 3,396
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#4 » by MN Die Hard » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:09 pm

I think he had a real coming out party in the playoffs....10 rebounds and 10 assists per game, along with 2.5 steals and over 16 points. I dont care for him much either and last year I figured he was riding coattails, but I think he came into his own this postseason. You dont put up those kinds of numbers exclusively because of your teammates.
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#5 » by B Calrissian » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:13 pm

I am not a big fan of his but I would trade the 6th for him in a second.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,018
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#6 » by Devilzsidewalk » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:32 pm

I'm a huge fan of his and I would trade the 6th for him in a second
Image
AirP.
RealGM
Posts: 37,094
And1: 32,153
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#7 » by AirP. » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:37 pm

Dewey wrote:THey can take Rondo and stick him where the sun don't shine. He is not very good with out Pierce, Allen and KG.


He use to not be very good without Pierce, Allen and KG. He's progressed very well as a player in the last 2 years.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,895
And1: 1,069
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#8 » by Dewey » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:51 pm

AirP. wrote:
Dewey wrote:THey can take Rondo and stick him where the sun don't shine. He is not very good with out Pierce, Allen and KG.


He use to not be very good without Pierce, Allen and KG. He's progressed very well as a player in the last 2 years.


He may have very well progressed, but put him on a below average team and see what happens...
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#9 » by john2jer » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:55 pm

I'd hit that.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
Zeitgeister
General Manager
Posts: 8,714
And1: 7,356
Joined: Nov 11, 2008
   

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#10 » by Zeitgeister » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:57 pm

Dewey wrote:THey can take Rondo and stick him where the sun don't shine. He is not very good with out Pierce, Allen and KG.


Based on what?
Lenin wrote: All over the world, wherever there are capitalists, freedom of the press means freedom to buy up newspapers, to buy writers, to bribe, buy and fake "public opinion" for the benefit of the bourgeoisie.
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#11 » by 4ho5ive » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:03 pm

I give up the 6th for Rondo and i dont look back
User avatar
PeeDee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,895
And1: 85
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#12 » by PeeDee » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:08 pm

We should've already gotten him in the KG trade.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,285
And1: 19,298
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#13 » by shrink » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:15 pm

PeeDee wrote:We should've already gotten him in the KG trade.


I wonder why people think saying this, because I've seen no evidence that Bos would have made a KG deal without at least having a PG on the roster they hope they could start. They barely had a center. Al Jefferson, Gomes and Telfair were all better than expected (Gerald Green worse), we got a $12 mil expiring, and we got two 1sts for a great, but very expensive superstar. But people keep saying we should have had Rondo too.

Anyway, I can't imagine a win-now team like BOS, with three aging stars, would consider upsetting the boat now by trading Rondo. He knows how to play with these guys, and the Celtics don't have the time to risk training a new PG.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,895
And1: 1,069
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#14 » by Dewey » Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:35 pm

Zeitgeister wrote:
Dewey wrote:THey can take Rondo and stick him where the sun don't shine. He is not very good with out Pierce, Allen and KG.


Based on what?


Same basis as everything else on this topic so far ... opinion. Most have the opinion he's well worth the 6th pick, and I have the opinion he's very over-rated due to 3 All-Star players on his team. Is he bad? No. Is he worth the #6 to me? No.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 25,054
And1: 3,612
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#15 » by Foye » Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:41 pm

I would trade #6 and Mike Miller for Rondo and filler in a second. If Rondo fixes this shooting thing he'll be one of the best pg's in the league.
C's won't trade him anyway for a draft pick unless they add a quality vet pg like Andre Miller...
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#16 » by cpfsf » Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:02 pm

Dewey wrote:THey can take Rondo and stick him where the sun don't shine. He is not very good with out Pierce, Allen and KG.


I don't think he's one of the elite point guards (ie Paul, Williams, or Kidd/Nash in their prime), but he averaged nearly a triple double w/o KG in the playoffs. The C's wouldn't have gotten too far w/o Rondo. Also I really don't see a possible trade scenario that could work for both teams.
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
User avatar
karch34
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,887
And1: 864
Joined: Jul 05, 2001
Location: Valley of the Sun
     

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#17 » by karch34 » Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:11 pm

cpfsf wrote:
Dewey wrote:THey can take Rondo and stick him where the sun don't shine. He is not very good with out Pierce, Allen and KG.


I don't think he's one of the elite point guards (ie Paul, Williams, or Kidd/Nash in their prime), but he averaged nearly a triple double w/o KG in the playoffs


Agreed. There was an article I read that said beware of those that have a breakout in the playoffs translating into similar performance in the following season. One of the examples were Hinrich and Deng. They argued that a lot of his breakout was due to KG being out, which I think you can argue both ways.

I think he's a p*** a*** p**** and really don't like him and wouldn't trade #6 for him. But I wouldn't be against some kind of deal for him as he's an above average PG.
User avatar
casey
General Manager
Posts: 7,660
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Contact:

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#18 » by casey » Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:15 pm

bruceallen61 wrote:Ive never liked rondo

I've always loved Rondo.



Well, not really. Hated him in college. But I've loved him once he got to the pros.
"I'm Ricky Rubio."
--Ricky Rubio
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,727
And1: 22,288
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#19 » by Klomp » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:43 am

Dewey wrote:THey can take Rondo and stick him where the sun don't shine. He is not very good with out Pierce, Allen and KG.


Better than Telfair though
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,895
And1: 1,069
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Rondo for #6? 

Post#20 » by Dewey » Wed Jun 17, 2009 3:03 am

klomp44 wrote:
Dewey wrote:THey can take Rondo and stick him where the sun don't shine. He is not very good with out Pierce, Allen and KG.


Better than Telfair though


A true statement.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves