ImageImage

TJ Ford

Moderators: dms269, HMFFL, Jamaaliver

Harry
Freshman
Posts: 65
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 08, 2001
Contact:

TJ Ford 

Post#1 » by Harry » Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:18 am

it is getting closer and closer where the Hawks are going to have to make decisions for next season's roster

#19, Speedy, and Acie for TJ Ford

i don't know if the Pacers would accept and if this is the best offer on the table for Ford, but it would give the Hawks more finaical flexability to resign Flip and Marvin.
raleigh
Head Coach
Posts: 6,293
And1: 603
Joined: Oct 23, 2004

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#2 » by raleigh » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:35 pm

That's too much for Ford.

It's either the #19 + Speedy, or Acie + Speedy + 2nd.
killbuckner
RealGM
Posts: 13,088
And1: 0
Joined: May 27, 2003

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#3 » by killbuckner » Thu Jun 18, 2009 1:53 pm

I think you are overvaluing Acie... I don't think he is valued as anything more than an expiring contract at this point. I'd be very surprised if his 4th year team option were picked up
User avatar
evildallas
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: in the land of weak ownership
Contact:

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#4 » by evildallas » Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:07 pm

Given the financial implications if Speedy for Ford straight up worked under the cap I would consider it fair because of the savings it would give Indy as they try resign Jarrett Jack. I think Acie may be needed to make the contracts get close enough though. There is more than just talent to consider in these trades. Ford has 2 yr/17M left on his contract and appeared headed to the bench late in the year.

I assume by financial flexibility you mean to renounce Bibby because Ford makes what I anticipated offering Bibby so it isn't a savings in my eyes. His contract does expire in 2 years which makes it a good match for drafting a PG to take over though. I suspect a Bibby resigning would require a 3 year deal.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
raleigh
Head Coach
Posts: 6,293
And1: 603
Joined: Oct 23, 2004

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#5 » by raleigh » Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:09 pm

killbuckner wrote:I think you are overvaluing Acie... I don't think he is valued as anything more than an expiring contract at this point. I'd be very surprised if his 4th year team option were picked up


And you know you're undervaluing him.
killbuckner
RealGM
Posts: 13,088
And1: 0
Joined: May 27, 2003

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#6 » by killbuckner » Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:11 pm

mrhonline- don't you think that he has more value as a 2.2 million dollar expiring contract than as a guy guaranteed 3 million dollars in 2011? Do you really think his TO will be picked up?
raleigh
Head Coach
Posts: 6,293
And1: 603
Joined: Oct 23, 2004

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#7 » by raleigh » Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:17 pm

Of course it will. He has hardly played in two years. He still has value.
killbuckner
RealGM
Posts: 13,088
And1: 0
Joined: May 27, 2003

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#8 » by killbuckner » Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:38 pm

well- Options must be picked up by October 31st so I guess we will see. I would be pretty shocked to see any team voluntarily pay Acie Law 3 million dollars in 2011. So many teams are trying to get rid of 2011 salary that I can't see any possible way his option would be picked up. Put it htis way- Shelden Williams showed more than Acie and he didn't have his team option picked up.
azuresou1
Head Coach
Posts: 7,444
And1: 1,095
Joined: Jun 15, 2009
   

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#9 » by azuresou1 » Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:48 pm

Shelden also got more PT than Acie.

I think Acie still has some value, but I wouldn't pick up his option ATM. Of course, this all changes if he gets more playing time and shows more consistency.
killbuckner
RealGM
Posts: 13,088
And1: 0
Joined: May 27, 2003

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#10 » by killbuckner » Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:56 pm

You have to pick up his 4th year TO before his 3rd year starts. I don't exactly get the argument that because Acie played less then he is worth more... He scored 2.9 PPG this year. If he were better he would have gotten more PT.
User avatar
evildallas
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: in the land of weak ownership
Contact:

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#11 » by evildallas » Thu Jun 18, 2009 5:08 pm

IMO, unless Acie Law looks like a total stud in preseason camp I don't think the option is picked up by the Hawks. If someone else trades for him it could go either way. If they want an expiring contract like most do they won't pick up the option. If they have mad love for Acie and think he's just not had an opportunity they might pick up the option. I just don't see many teams in that latter camp.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
Harry10
Banned User
Posts: 8,784
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 16, 2002

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#12 » by Harry10 » Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:37 pm

evildallas wrote:Given the financial implications if Speedy for Ford straight up worked under the cap I would consider it fair because of the savings it would give Indy as they try resign Jarrett Jack. I think Acie may be needed to make the contracts get close enough though. There is more than just talent to consider in these trades. Ford has 2 yr/17M left on his contract and appeared headed to the bench late in the year.

I assume by financial flexibility you mean to renounce Bibby because Ford makes what I anticipated offering Bibby so it isn't a savings in my eyes. His contract does expire in 2 years which makes it a good match for drafting a PG to take over though. I suspect a Bibby resigning would require a 3 year deal.


i wanted to post 19, and Speedy for Ford...... but it doesn't work in Trade Checker (i had to add Acie or Morris)

if the Hawks offer Bibby $5M, then Speedy, Acie, and Bibby for 2010 would come out to $10.9M on the Hawks' books

if the trade happen, then with Ford, it comes out to $8.5M....... the savings comes out to $2.4M

if Hawks offer Acie an option, then that could slightly effect resigning Joe
User avatar
evildallas
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: in the land of weak ownership
Contact:

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#13 » by evildallas » Thu Jun 18, 2009 11:54 pm

^^^ Indiana is not in great financial shape either. They wouldn't want to take on more salary.

Speedy + Acie for TJ Ford works in my eyes (and in trade checker) because I've given up on Acie and see him as an expiring contract, same as Speedy. Ford is 8.5M, Speedy + Acie would be 7.5M and if insurance takes on $4M of that then Indiana saves 5M in year one and 8.5 in year 2. I don't give them the pick because they are saving quite a bit of money. Our savings would be from replacing Speedy and Acie with someone who plays and renouncing Bibby. I think that resigning Flip for insurance would be real important as would drafting a PG. The other thing to consider is does having that 8.5M committed in year 2 make signing Joe any more or less likely. I don't know the answer nor do I feel like crunching the numbers right now.

I favor almost any deal that replaces Speedy with someone who can play. I think it is the only way we really improve next year. Having said that, I'm not really sold on TJ Ford as an upgrade to Bibby though. If someone has the breakdown I'd be interested in reading it though. Felton or Sessions seem like better investments to me.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!
raleigh
Head Coach
Posts: 6,293
And1: 603
Joined: Oct 23, 2004

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#14 » by raleigh » Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:32 am

Indy's big financial crunch will be 2010, which is why the Law/Claxton trade makes sense for them.

I also wouldn't rule out the possibility of having both Ford and Bibby.
User avatar
evildallas
General Manager
Posts: 9,412
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: in the land of weak ownership
Contact:

Re: TJ Ford 

Post#15 » by evildallas » Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:19 am

Interesting thought. Have to do the math on it. Ford + Bibby would depend on Bibby's salary, as well as what happens with Zaza and probably most of all the Luxury Tax level, but I could see it as a way to free up most of the MLE for a big. I'd understand trying to deal the pick in that scenario because the strategy is really leveraged for a 1 or 2 year run. If not signing someone with the full MLE there would be a possibility of keeping Flip to play the backup 2 and still having enough to court David Andersen for the front line. To be honest there's a lot of ifs in the plan and I'd be really impressed if Sund deliver such a cohesive tweaking of the roster.
Going to donkey punch a leprechaun!

Return to Atlanta Hawks