ImageImageImage

Kahn's direction

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

MLC84
Ballboy
Posts: 41
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 18, 2009

Kahn's direction 

Post#1 » by MLC84 » Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:16 am

Just putting togther things we've heard from Kahn to this point -

1. he has "a 16 month timetable for turn-around"

2. he's looking at "7-10 new players" and that the need "to go in another direction is obvious"

3. [i]In discussing the current roster, Kahn said, "On a championship-contending team, Al [Jefferson] might be the second-best player. ... Kevin [Love] might be the fourth-best player." Jefferson, he added later, is ahead of schedule in rehabbing his torn ACL, is expected to be ready at the start of training camp and has lost weight.

It seems to me he is looking first to deal for a "best-player" veteran. I have no idea how he plans to do that - there aren't that many players with more value that Al Jefferson you could hope to get in a trade, especially with what the Wolves could offer.

And there are no players I see in this draft who are "best player on a championship team" caliber - and really none I'd expect to do much in the next 16 months.

So I just don't see how he can realistically hope turn things around quickly. He seems likely to use pieces wth at least some value (Love, Foye, Miller, Gomes) to go after something. But I'm not confident he can come up with good vets or draft picks that will be much of an improvement in the short term.

I'm concerned he'll take a chance on deals and end up with the short end of the stick. I don't see much talent evaluation and team construction in his background. Not that what has been in place in Minn lately is any better, really. But I'm not confident based on what I have heard and seen.
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 18,522
And1: 4,979
Joined: Oct 12, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#2 » by theGreatRC » Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:23 am

Obviously he wants to T-Wolves to make the playoffs and he is giving himself a 17 month timetable to do so.

I can see Foye, Miller, Gomes, Smith, #6, #18, #28 being used to accomplish that goal.

We also don't know what kind of Free Agent he could sign this off-season or next off-season.

He talks a big game, but he hasn't done **** yet.
Dysfunctional Wolves fan
TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,427
And1: 1,118
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#3 » by TheProdigy » Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:45 am

MLC84 wrote:3. [i]In discussing the current roster, Kahn said, "On a championship-contending team, Al [Jefferson] might be the second-best player. ... Kevin [Love] might be the fourth-best player." Jefferson, he added later, is ahead of schedule in rehabbing his torn ACL, is expected to be ready at the start of training camp and has lost weight.


While it's refreshing to hear a GM speaking the truth, don't you think that statement could be offensive to either of them? Big Al is a 24 year old coming off a 23 and 11 season, and Kevin Love is only entering his second year. The last thing we want our GM to do is piss off our best players because they feel disrespected.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,895
And1: 1,069
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#4 » by Dewey » Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:45 am

I remember he put Indiana in a pickle due to his obsession for Tinsley ... Tinsley was a bust. Well, we will see alot in the next 7 days.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Dan's with the Wolves
Pro Prospect
Posts: 787
And1: 17
Joined: Nov 06, 2004

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#5 » by Dan's with the Wolves » Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:16 am

DaKidKG wrote:
MLC84 wrote:3. [i]In discussing the current roster, Kahn said, "On a championship-contending team, Al [Jefferson] might be the second-best player. ... Kevin [Love] might be the fourth-best player." Jefferson, he added later, is ahead of schedule in rehabbing his torn ACL, is expected to be ready at the start of training camp and has lost weight.


While it's refreshing to hear a GM speaking the truth, don't you think that statement could be offensive to either of them? Big Al is a 24 year old coming off a 23 and 11 season, and Kevin Love is only entering his second year. The last thing we want our GM to do is piss off our best players because they feel disrespected.


It wouldn't surprise me that at the end of his plan there are no current players on the Wolves roster.
User avatar
Esohny
RealGM
Posts: 11,613
And1: 339
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Location: Saint Paul
     

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#6 » by Esohny » Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:23 am

If you start to feel really nervous, just remember:

We're Timberwolves fans! We're numb to getting slapped in the face with poor personnel decisions!

I think we'll be able to deal with any setbacks with the usual gallows humor and heavy drinking.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,727
And1: 22,289
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#7 » by Klomp » Fri Jun 19, 2009 4:46 am

DaKidKG wrote:
MLC84 wrote:3. [i]In discussing the current roster, Kahn said, "On a championship-contending team, Al [Jefferson] might be the second-best player. ... Kevin [Love] might be the fourth-best player." Jefferson, he added later, is ahead of schedule in rehabbing his torn ACL, is expected to be ready at the start of training camp and has lost weight.


While it's refreshing to hear a GM speaking the truth, don't you think that statement could be offensive to either of them? Big Al is a 24 year old coming off a 23 and 11 season, and Kevin Love is only entering his second year. The last thing we want our GM to do is piss off our best players because they feel disrespected.


Then they should grow up if they get hurt feelings because of that. This is a grown mans game. If you can't take criticism, get out.

Anyways, looking back a long ways, he wouldn't be the best player on championship teams, maybe except for the Pistons in 2004.

2009: Kobe>Al
2008: KG,Pierce>Al
2007: Duncan, Parker>Al
2006: Wade>Al
2005: Duncan>Al
2004: Chauncey?
2003: Duncan>Al
2002: Shaq, Kobe>Al

I'll stop there. SUPERSTARS win championships. Not just stars. Right now, Al is on star level. Either he develops into a superstar (improve defense, range, passing) or we need to find one.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#8 » by skorff26 » Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:16 am

I think that ideally Al would be the ideal #2 option. just like when we had KG, he would have been better as a #2 option. Most often the #1 scoring option on championship teams is someone playing the wings and if they aren't able to get to the basket, then you get it down low to your big man.

Ideally on offense, we would have a PG who can distribute the ball to the open players, a SG/SF that could hit the 3, a SG/SF that would put up 25 points a night and be our #1 option, a scoring big man downlow as option #2, and another big that can bang away and maybe hit an open shot if need be.

Also look at the big men that averaged more than 20 points a game this year, (Dirk, Jefferson, Bosh, Jamison, Amare, West, Randolph, Howard), other than Dwight Howard, none of these guys have had much success in the playoffs and most are #1 options on their team; you need a wing player to be that #1 option and your big man to be your #2 option
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,730
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#9 » by jpatrick » Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:26 am

I don't know. The last two mini-dynasties were Shaq's Lakers (Shaq was clearly the #1 option over Kobe back then) and Duncan's spurs. I think a big man can be the #1 guy on a championship team but a true #1 post is a better facilitator (can run O through him) and better defender than Al. Jefferson is what he is, a great post scorer, improving shot blocker and probably a #2 guy on a championship team.
User avatar
RD&KG2
Rookie
Posts: 1,019
And1: 2
Joined: Mar 31, 2003
Location: MN/IA

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#10 » by RD&KG2 » Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:04 am

Dewey wrote:I remember he put Indiana in a pickle due to his obsession for Tinsley ... Tinsley was a bust. Well, we will see alot in the next 7 days.


I hate to defend a Cyclone, but Tinsley was not a bust. He was the 27th pick of the draft, and has put up some pretty solid numbers. His problems have been injuries, some significant family issues, and the only one I know that might still be a problem is his attitude.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamaal_Tinsley
"First of all I'd like to thank myself for all the hard work I put in"--Carmello Anthony.
User avatar
RD&KG2
Rookie
Posts: 1,019
And1: 2
Joined: Mar 31, 2003
Location: MN/IA

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#11 » by RD&KG2 » Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:05 am

for the record, I'm not saying I want him here.
"First of all I'd like to thank myself for all the hard work I put in"--Carmello Anthony.
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#12 » by skorff26 » Sat Jun 20, 2009 1:08 am

I don't expect a bunch of trades, Kahn says that we will have 7-10 new players; but that doesn't mean anything.

Well, we'll need to have 7-10 new guys since we will be losing these guys in the next 16 months
1. Shelden Williams (probably not resigned)
2. Ollie (probably not resigned)
3. Jason Collins (probably not resigned)
4. Rodney Carney (probably not resigned because of lack of playing time for him)
5. Mark Madsen (probably not brought back after 2010)
6. Bobby Brown (probably not brought back after 2010)
7. Brian Cardinal (probably not brought back after 2010)
8. Craig Smith (probably not brought back after 2010 because of lack of playing time for him)
9. Mike Miller (might not be back after 2010)
10. Ryan Gomes (unguaranteed, possibility of being cut)


-So there's 7-10 players that have a good chance of not being back in 16 months just because they expire, (I think the top 7 won't be here for sure)

-Plus we would be bringing in 3 firsts this year, maybe 2 firsts next year, and some 2nd rounders, and we will probably sign a few free agents as well.

-Kahn is speaking about big changes, but even if the old management was around we would have 7-10 new guys here in 16 months.
MLC84
Ballboy
Posts: 41
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 18, 2009

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#13 » by MLC84 » Sat Jun 20, 2009 4:29 am

theGreatRC wrote:Obviously he wants to T-Wolves to make the playoffs and he is giving himself a 17 month timetable to do so.

I can see Foye, Miller, Gomes, Smith, #6, #18, #28 being used to accomplish that goal.

We also don't know what kind of Free Agent he could sign this off-season or next off-season.

He talks a big game, but he hasn't done **** yet.


I'm not sure he really talks that good a game. Clearly he is headed in a complete rebuild mode. Figure he has to be planning to trade Foye, Miller and Cardinal very soon. Jefferson bacically can't/shouldn't be traded, and Love probably not - though either could happen I suppose. Gomes has some value, but isn't costing you that much to keep. I don't think Brewer has shown anything to invite interest - same with the others now on the team.

With those pieces and picks in a not-good draft to offer, and if he wants $ space for free agents, he can't look for established vet starts back in deals. So you would take back draft picks or young unestablished guys - which puts you basically right were you are now.

If you think about a "17 month timetable", it suggests looking to be active if the free agent market next year. What top-tier free agent might he be looking at for next summer? Where is he going to come up with the #1 and #3 guys? Other than Griffin, are there more than three players in this draft who could realistically pan out to be the #3 (forget the #1) guy if Love if a #4-level talent at best?
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,895
And1: 1,069
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Kahn's direction 

Post#14 » by Dewey » Sat Jun 20, 2009 6:02 pm

MLC84 wrote:
theGreatRC wrote:Obviously he wants to T-Wolves to make the playoffs and he is giving himself a 17 month timetable to do so.

I can see Foye, Miller, Gomes, Smith, #6, #18, #28 being used to accomplish that goal.

We also don't know what kind of Free Agent he could sign this off-season or next off-season.

He talks a big game, but he hasn't done **** yet.


I'm not sure he really talks that good a game. Clearly he is headed in a complete rebuild mode. Figure he has to be planning to trade Foye, Miller and Cardinal very soon. Jefferson bacically can't/shouldn't be traded, and Love probably not - though either could happen I suppose. Gomes has some value, but isn't costing you that much to keep. I don't think Brewer has shown anything to invite interest - same with the others now on the team.

With those pieces and picks in a not-good draft to offer, and if he wants $ space for free agents, he can't look for established vet starts back in deals. So you would take back draft picks or young unestablished guys - which puts you basically right were you are now.

If you think about a "17 month timetable", it suggests looking to be active if the free agent market next year. What top-tier free agent might he be looking at for next summer? Where is he going to come up with the #1 and #3 guys? Other than Griffin, are there more than three players in this draft who could realistically pan out to be the #3 (forget the #1) guy if Love if a #4-level talent at best?


I feel Brewer and Miller very good complimentary players (Defense/Shooter) - both preferrably bench players. Love and Jefferson are good starters on a good team. We need a PG and a Center and an upgrade at SG. We may have to use Love or Jefferson to get our PG.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves