ImageImageImage

NJ / BOS

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

Celtics>Breathing
Banned User
Posts: 836
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: Celtic Country

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#21 » by Celtics>Breathing » Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:24 pm

sully00 wrote:
Celtics>Breathing wrote:
sully00 wrote:This would be a disaster. Nobody has ever won anything with Vince Carter, he is a whopping year younger than Ray with another year on his deal. He is much more focused on his individual performance than is his team's performance.

Ray has proven to be an efficient offensive weapon in a reduced role, that is never anything that we have seen from Carter. I think you would see his numbers and happiness reduce significantly taking 13-14 shots a game and not having the ball in his hands. Vince is headed for a Jerry Stackhouse decline not a Reggie Miller one.



Wow sully! Sounds like your talking about Paul Pierce before KG got here. How funny is that :lol: . I think PP should be taking 12-13 shots a game, and VC taking 18-20 shots a game if this move was made. Paul can handle the end of the game duties.


Wow shows what you and the rest of the people supporting this idea know. Paul Pierce takes 13-14 shots a game now, even in a season that KG missed a 3rd of. He also did this his first year under Doc with Ricky Davis and Raef and eventually Antoine to share shots with. There aren't 18-20 shots a game for VC in Boston, who is a less effective and accurate scorer than Pierce and absolutely allergic to defense.

How is Vince Carter an upgrade to Ray Allen? What are you bringing him to Boston to do? He is 32 years old what is the point?




Ray Allen 13 shots per last two years
Paul Pierce 14 shots per game last two years

Vince Carter 17 shots per game last two years

God sully I'm sure VC will just want to kill himself or Doc for only being able to take two fewer shots per game than his last two years.
Celtics>Breathing
Banned User
Posts: 836
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: Celtic Country

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#22 » by Celtics>Breathing » Mon Jun 22, 2009 5:28 pm

You know what I'm tired of all this homer bull that goes on these sites. NJ fans think that Ray straight up for VC isn't fair. Our fans think VC is a scrub, but yet we worship Paul Pierce who might be a less talented player (especially before KG) than VC. It's ridiculous. :evil: Who knows how VC would do playing with PP and KG. I guarantee it would be a lot better than what NJ been getting for the last 3 years.
User avatar
Barry Lird
Junior
Posts: 314
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 20, 2007

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#23 » by Barry Lird » Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:13 pm

Celtics>Breathing wrote:You know what I'm tired of all this homer bull that goes on these sites. NJ fans think that Ray straight up for VC isn't fair. Our fans think VC is a scrub, but yet we worship Paul Pierce who might be a less talented player (especially before KG) than VC. It's ridiculous. :evil: Who knows how VC would do playing with PP and KG. I guarantee it would be a lot better than what NJ been getting for the last 3 years.

Apparently Jersey fans don't realize that for their side, this is nearly entirely a salary dump and setting themselves up for a big 10/11 offseason, and that the reason they'd have to throw in more in the exchange is that we're taking on VC's 17.3 mil in 10/11. It's really not about whether Ray's better than VC or not, although from our side, we'd need a good starting 2, and VC is still that.

I see this as at least plausible, not to say that Danny will do it, but it's definitely not crazy, depending on what else besides VC they throw in.
Celtics>Breathing
Banned User
Posts: 836
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: Celtic Country

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#24 » by Celtics>Breathing » Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:36 pm

Barry Lird wrote:
Celtics>Breathing wrote:You know what I'm tired of all this homer bull that goes on these sites. NJ fans think that Ray straight up for VC isn't fair. Our fans think VC is a scrub, but yet we worship Paul Pierce who might be a less talented player (especially before KG) than VC. It's ridiculous. :evil: Who knows how VC would do playing with PP and KG. I guarantee it would be a lot better than what NJ been getting for the last 3 years.

Apparently Jersey fans don't realize that for their side, this is nearly entirely a salary dump and setting themselves up for a big 10/11 offseason, and that the reason they'd have to throw in more in the exchange is that we're taking on VC's 17.3 mil in 10/11. It's really not about whether Ray's better than VC or not, although from our side, we'd need a good starting 2, and VC is still that.

I see this as at least plausible, not to say that Danny will do it, but it's definitely not crazy, depending on what else besides VC they throw in.



An objective view Barry. Agreed. Who knows what DA comin up with. I think it just has to be something.
User avatar
Marley2Hendrix
RealGM
Posts: 11,669
And1: 2,575
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
     

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#25 » by Marley2Hendrix » Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:45 pm

Celtics>Breathing wrote:
Barry Lird wrote:
Celtics>Breathing wrote:You know what I'm tired of all this homer bull that goes on these sites. NJ fans think that Ray straight up for VC isn't fair. Our fans think VC is a scrub, but yet we worship Paul Pierce who might be a less talented player (especially before KG) than VC. It's ridiculous. :evil: Who knows how VC would do playing with PP and KG. I guarantee it would be a lot better than what NJ been getting for the last 3 years.

Apparently Jersey fans don't realize that for their side, this is nearly entirely a salary dump and setting themselves up for a big 10/11 offseason, and that the reason they'd have to throw in more in the exchange is that we're taking on VC's 17.3 mil in 10/11. It's really not about whether Ray's better than VC or not, although from our side, we'd need a good starting 2, and VC is still that.

I see this as at least plausible, not to say that Danny will do it, but it's definitely not crazy, depending on what else besides VC they throw in.



An objective view Barry. Agreed. Who knows what DA comin up with. I think it just has to be something.


I don't really like it, Carter is only 1 1/2 years younger than ray and their games are predicated on opposite ends of the spectrum, Ray compliments PP and KG so much better as a 3rd wheel, and he will age sooooo much better than vince. I don't think the 11th is quite enough to encourage this unnecessary risk.
You gotta make it sexy! Hips and nips, otherwise I'm not eating.
User avatar
Barry Lird
Junior
Posts: 314
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 20, 2007

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#26 » by Barry Lird » Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:54 pm

Marley2Hendrix wrote:I don't really like it, Carter is only 1 1/2 years younger than ray and their games are predicated on opposite ends of the spectrum, Ray compliments PP and KG so much better as a 3rd wheel, and he will age sooooo much better than vince. I don't think the 11th is quite enough to encourage this unnecessary risk.

Agreed. Just adding the #11 would not be enough for us, as that player probably would get very little PT. They'd have to fill one of our backup needs, so Dooling or Hayes (for example) would be a must as well.
BadWolf
General Manager
Posts: 8,929
And1: 3,428
Joined: Jun 06, 2006

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#27 » by BadWolf » Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:59 pm

You have to do this.
We can/should have 2011 plan.
We get nr 11, ie Clark? Solid sf/pf tweener to be rotation player, probably better Gomes, and a look at williams.
Oh, and Vince at this point is much better then Ray.
VC had more success then Ray in their first 8-10 years, didn't he?
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,263
And1: 69,854
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#28 » by Celts17Pride » Mon Jun 22, 2009 8:31 pm

BadWolf wrote:You have to do this.
We can/should have 2011 plan.
We get nr 11, ie Clark? Solid sf/pf tweener to be rotation player, probably better Gomes, and a look at williams.
Oh, and Vince at this point is much better then Ray.
VC had more success then Ray in their first 8-10 years, didn't he?


Puke!

I would take Ray over Wince Carter any day of the week. Wince is just collecting a paycheck. No heart.

Heck why don't the Celtics trade Ray, Pierce & Rondo and get Carter, McGrady & Bibby. They could get everyone on the all overrated team. That would be a record setting team. 15 win team right there.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#29 » by sully00 » Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:51 pm

Celtics>Breathing wrote:
sully00 wrote:Wow shows what you and the rest of the people supporting this idea know. Paul Pierce takes 13-14 shots a game now, even in a season that KG missed a 3rd of. He also did this his first year under Doc with Ricky Davis and Raef and eventually Antoine to share shots with. There aren't 18-20 shots a game for VC in Boston, who is a less effective and accurate scorer than Pierce and absolutely allergic to defense.

How is Vince Carter an upgrade to Ray Allen? What are you bringing him to Boston to do? He is 32 years old what is the point?




Ray Allen 13 shots per last two years
Paul Pierce 14 shots per game last two years

Vince Carter 17 shots per game last two years

God sully I'm sure VC will just want to kill himself or Doc for only being able to take two fewer shots per game than his last two years.


No I would kill myself knowing we are paying Wince Carter 17 million dollars to score 15 ppg and flash the skills that compile that 112 DRT and 17.3 oppPER. Just makes me scream ubuntu WTF. Vince is a push at best (+1.9) on the court right now and that is with him healthy and shooting the hell out of the thing. He is a one dimensional player who hurts his team.

Just for reference Ray is +11/DRT 106, oppPER of 12.

You must have loved the Dominique Wilkins era in Boston.
Darth Celtic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,946
And1: 17,506
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Big 3 will crush the east!
     

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#30 » by Darth Celtic » Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:55 pm

i think it's a wash. Talent wise vince can create offense better, where ray is better shooter so better off others creating.

Vince is younger and would extend the time we got.

I'd rather extend ray for 2 years at 7-8million, but if ray says no, better to do this trade then be stuck without ray next year and no vince either.
MrDollarBills = MrWelchesBets
User avatar
Marley2Hendrix
RealGM
Posts: 11,669
And1: 2,575
Joined: Jun 16, 2003
     

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#31 » by Marley2Hendrix » Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:58 pm

i think it's a wash. Talent wise vince can create offense better, where ray is better shooter so better off others creating.

Vince is younger and would extend the time we got.

I'd rather extend ray for 2 years at 7-8million, but if ray says no, better to do this trade then be stuck without ray next year and no vince either.


to the bolded part simply no, just no. Vince is about 18 mos older than ray and his game is largely predicated on athleticism and will not age anywhere near as smoothly as Ray's. If vince is the better player right now (and I don't think he is, especially good work by sully, some stuff I looked at right when I saw this), ray will quickly surpass him, all the while vince will likely be making more money. I have faith in Doc, Ray, and Management that if Allen leaves this team, it will be for a good reason
You gotta make it sexy! Hips and nips, otherwise I'm not eating.
Celtics>Breathing
Banned User
Posts: 836
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: Celtic Country

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#32 » by Celtics>Breathing » Mon Jun 22, 2009 11:44 pm

Marley2Hendrix wrote:
i think it's a wash. Talent wise vince can create offense better, where ray is better shooter so better off others creating.

Vince is younger and would extend the time we got.

I'd rather extend ray for 2 years at 7-8million, but if ray says no, better to do this trade then be stuck without ray next year and no vince either.


to the bolded part simply no, just no. Vince is about 18 mos older than ray and his game is largely predicated on athleticism and will not age anywhere near as smoothly as Ray's. If vince is the better player right now (and I don't think he is, especially good work by sully, some stuff I looked at right when I saw this), ray will quickly surpass him, all the while vince will likely be making more money. I have faith in Doc, Ray, and Management that if Allen leaves this team, it will be for a good reason



I don't think it's fair to label someone before they would even play a game here in Boston. I do believe most NBA people called KG a "choker" before becoming a Celtic. Not sure what would happen if VC came to Boston but don't say that you are sure you know what would happen.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#33 » by sully00 » Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:22 am

Celtics>Breathing wrote:I don't think it's fair to label someone before they would even play a game here in Boston. I do believe most NBA people called KG a "choker" before becoming a Celtic. Not sure what would happen if VC came to Boston but don't say that you are sure you know what would happen.


I don't think it is fair to just forget about what a guy has done in his career because he scores 20 ppg. Dude is made of glass and a quiter. He quit on his franchise, hell an entire country, when it comes down to it I don't really think there is anything more offensive in pro sports than what Carter did to TOR. He labeled himself.

I don't ever want to know what would happen.
floyd
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,414
And1: 649
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#34 » by floyd » Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:32 am

sully00 wrote:
Celtics>Breathing wrote:I don't think it's fair to label someone before they would even play a game here in Boston. I do believe most NBA people called KG a "choker" before becoming a Celtic. Not sure what would happen if VC came to Boston but don't say that you are sure you know what would happen.


I don't think it is fair to just forget about what a guy has done in his career because he scores 20 ppg. Dude is made of glass and a quiter. He quit on his franchise, hell an entire country, when it comes down to it I don't really think there is anything more offensive in pro sports than what Carter did to TOR. He labeled himself.

I don't ever want to know what would happen.


Amen to that.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,263
And1: 69,854
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#35 » by Celts17Pride » Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:34 am

floyd wrote:
sully00 wrote:
Celtics>Breathing wrote:I don't think it's fair to label someone before they would even play a game here in Boston. I do believe most NBA people called KG a "choker" before becoming a Celtic. Not sure what would happen if VC came to Boston but don't say that you are sure you know what would happen.


I don't think it is fair to just forget about what a guy has done in his career because he scores 20 ppg. Dude is made of glass and a quiter. He quit on his franchise, hell an entire country, when it comes down to it I don't really think there is anything more offensive in pro sports than what Carter did to TOR. He labeled himself.

I don't ever want to know what would happen.


Amen to that.


Ditto!
Celtics>Breathing
Banned User
Posts: 836
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: Celtic Country

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#36 » by Celtics>Breathing » Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:37 am

floyd wrote:
sully00 wrote:
Celtics>Breathing wrote:I don't think it's fair to label someone before they would even play a game here in Boston. I do believe most NBA people called KG a "choker" before becoming a Celtic. Not sure what would happen if VC came to Boston but don't say that you are sure you know what would happen.


I don't think it is fair to just forget about what a guy has done in his career because he scores 20 ppg. Dude is made of glass and a quiter. He quit on his franchise, hell an entire country, when it comes down to it I don't really think there is anything more offensive in pro sports than what Carter did to TOR. He labeled himself.

I don't ever want to know what would happen.


Amen to that.



You guys sit up on your high horse and pretend that **** never went down here in Boston. Do you remember what Pierce did in 05' when we played the Pacers in the playoffs. That was one of the most unprofessional things I've ever seen in sports. The dude was acting like a 10 year old. Should he be labeled so, and so because of that? Not here in Boston with all the unrealistic homers. I'm a god damn die hard Celtics fan, but I'm realistic.
floyd
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,414
And1: 649
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#37 » by floyd » Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:41 am

Celtics>Breathing wrote:

You guys sit up on your high horse and pretend that **** never went down here in Boston. Do you remember what Pierce did in 05' when we played the Pacers in the playoffs. That was one of the most unprofessional things I've ever seen in sports. The dude was acting like a 10 year old. Should he be labeled so, and so because of that? Not here in Boston with all the unrealistic homers. I'm a god damn die hard Celtics fan, but I'm realistic.


Pierce acted like an immature ass but he never quit on anyone and he's tough as nails. I don't know how u can compare - especially from a celtics fan.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#38 » by sully00 » Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:45 am

I feel like I am in the twilight zone, are you kidding me? I don't even know if your talking about the Tech or the Bandage on the head one of which was dumb and the other kind of funny.

How does Paul Pierce getting a technical foul late in a game after he gets hit in the head relate to a max contract player tanking on his team to such an extent that they can no longer allow him to take the court and can get nothing of value for him in return?

You need to take the poster down.
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 13,912
And1: 10,060
Joined: Oct 12, 2004
Location: Medieval England, Iowa
Contact:

Re: NJ / BOS 

Post#39 » by Slartibartfast » Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:58 am

Yeah, Vince isn't the paragon of sportsmanship, but he would be an upgrade in talent. It would be a difficult talent mesh however. He's a ball-controller, and a pretty good one, but we've already got two good ones in Paul Pierce and Rajon Rondo who are made that much better by the off-ball presence of Ray Allen. Straight up, I'd say no, but if you could land the redonkulous deal of Ray Allen and Giddens for Carter, Dooling and the #11, I'd do it. That's just too much to leave on the table. While Vince might not be the perfect fit, he's no Iverson/Maggette/Randolph, i.e. one trick ponies who can only function as the center of their basketball universes. Vince can shoot, pass, penetrate, rebound, steal the ball and fill the break. He's got the tools to be a fine support player. If utilized properly, he could make us even more difficult to defend.

Return to Boston Celtics