Jeff Green, Earl Watson, and the Suns' 2010 for Love/Rubio

ThunderPoke · Post #1 » by **ThunderPoke** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:20 pm

If the Thunder offered:

Jeff Green
Earl Watson (expiring)
Suns 2010 pick (likely top 5)

for

Kevin Love
Ricky Rubio

Would you do that deal?

Esohny · Post #2 » by **Esohny** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:23 pm

ThunderPoke wrote:If the Thunder offered:

Jeff Green
Earl Watson (expiring)
Suns 2010 pick (likely top 5)

for

Kevin Love
Ricky Rubio

Would you do that deal?

Nope. Love is at least equal to Green, and Rubio for the rest? Eeesh.

moss_is_1 · Post #3 » by **moss_is_1** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:24 pm

No..More like Durant Watson and the suns pick for Rubio and Love.

LOBO 7 · Post #4 » by **LOBO 7** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:25 pm

moss_is_1 wrote:No..More like Durant Watson and the suns pick for Rubio and Love.

Or Durant, Green and the Suns pick......

Winter Wonder · Post #5 » by **Winter Wonder** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:25 pm

In MN at least, though other teams have agreed as well, Love > Green and Rubio > than the Suns pick which could be anywhere in the lottery and quite possibly in 10 or greater. Also, Cap space > Watson who is another PG (MN has 4 before or after trade) and don't have a bad contract where they would need a PG short of Songaila.

Clark rights were with the Suns last I saw, Green and Watson with OKC, who this trade is with.

FairDinkum · Post #6 » by **FairDinkum** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:26 pm

LOBO 7 wrote:
moss_is_1 wrote:No..More like Durant Watson and the suns pick for Rubio and Love.

Or Durant, Green and the Suns pick......

john2jer · Post #7 » by **john2jer** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:28 pm

BUT WE GET AN EXPIRING, GUYS! We should trade two guys on rookie deals just for the expiring.

What makes you think Rubio would want to play for OKC?

Dan's with the Wolves · Post #8 » by **Dan's with the Wolves** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:29 pm

ThunderPoke wrote:If the Thunder offered:

Jeff Green
Earl Watson (expiring)
Suns 2010 pick (likely top 5)

for

Kevin Love
Ricky Rubio

Would you do that deal?

Presti had his chance, he took Harden. Deal with it

Carpe Diem · Post #9 » by **Carpe Diem** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:34 pm

we are going to be hearing these crap trade offers for a very long time, me thinks. Love for Green is an interesting offer, but us throwing in Rubio too..

Krapinsky · Post #10 » by **Krapinsky** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:02 pm

The Suns are going to have a top 5 pick next year?

I highly doubt that. Even without Amare,they'll still have Nash, Barbosa, Richardson, Clark, and at worst Brandon Wright and Biendrins. That's still going to be a competitive teams.

Post #11 » by **revprodeji** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:03 pm

This is a rather bad offer. And OKC is a smaller marker than MPLS.

Kurosawa · Post #12 » by **Kurosawa** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:47 pm

Fantastic deal...for OKC.

Why would a team with at least five, and as many as eight, expiring contracts as it is want or need to take on more?

Blasphemy · Post #13 » by **Blasphemy** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:58 pm

Kahn is the dumbest GM EVER!

Esohny · Post #14 » by **Esohny** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:13 pm

Blasphemy wrote:Kahn is the dumbest GM EVER!

Say, could we get a Mod to deal with this "guest" please?

This is multiple threads he's trolling in.

LOOSH · Post #15 » by **LOOSH** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:31 pm

This trade is terribly lopsided, but ...

Love for Green is a good deal that would balance both teams rosters nicely IMO.

Foye · Post #16 » by **Foye** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:00 am

LOOSH wrote:This trade is terribly lopsided, but ...

Love for Green is a good deal that would balance both teams rosters nicely IMO.

valuevise right now yes but I think Love will turn out to be a bit bettern than Green at the end of the day.