rsavaj wrote:3 yrs 19-21 mill for me
Report on RGM says Suns are "targeting" Ariza and offering $8-$9 mil/year.
That would be great to have him.
This whole rebuild thing - add a couple of pieces like Ariza, Chandler and we *are* rebuilt.
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
rsavaj wrote:3 yrs 19-21 mill for me
TASTIC wrote:what the?! where?
They're going to give Ariza $8-$9m a year? Jesus...
As vaj said, $20m over 3
NapoleonII wrote:Anything over 7m a year for him is overpaying....I think the Lakers will pay up anyways.
rsavaj wrote:if we're not under the cap how can we even make that offer?
are we salary dumping nash?
JohnVancouver wrote:OK, I found it and I misremembered the source. It was not on one of the NBA news sites (HWorld etc.)
It was on the Amare for Josh Smith thread
"Well, well.... I just heard with JT the brick that he heard that there's a team who is very high in Trevor Ariza.. He mention that the Suns and Steve Kerr were going to make Ariza a priority. How you made add? Well there's a Ben Wallace or Sasha Pavlovic contracts that the Suns may use to do a Sign and trade with the Lakers.
They are willing to pay Ariza anywhere from 8mil to 10 mil and make him their new Marion. Hhmmm.. I don't know how accurate JT the Brick is, but I like this move if it happens.."
So less than dependable reportage there. No way i see us doing a deal with the Lakers.
Then again, woudl anything our FO do be a surprise?
chefsunsfan7 wrote:I dont understand all of the Nash hating around here. He has his defensive limitations but the guy is still elite. I'd rather keep him around as much as possible, we already have an understudy in Dragic. I think extending Nash is the right thing to do. With more defensive minded players Nashs defensive weaknesses would be covered to a large extent. And Nash is a leader. I just dont get it. I'd rather have Nash than Amare