Wilcox or Robert Swift

rak1974 · Post #1 » by **rak1974** » Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:42 pm

haven't seen a whole lot of Swift..... is he a good back up center or is he best as a third guy on the bench? and also which one of these guys, if any, would you all want to see back on your team?

lim206 · Post #2 » by **lim206** » Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:12 pm

none of them, we had robert swift for the longest and all he ever does is get injured... and wilcox cost too much, so we choose none

Post #3 » by **wizkid27** » Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:21 pm

Yeah... I think all of our current options fit better with this team. WIlcox has a place in the NBA, as of now, I think it is basically being the first big off of the bench that runs its offense on inside scoring. Basically, this would create less of a drop-off from whoever the team's primary back-to-the-basket player is to the bench. He's good when you toss the ball to him down there... just kind of average at everything else.

Swift has a couple of average abilities that may keep him as a 3rd string big for a few more years, but not really anything that will cement his place in the league long-term.

Post #4 » by **slick_watts** » Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:28 pm

swift is done, he was never that great and now he can barely move.

wilcox could contribute in the right situation. the knicks were the perfect team for him, a team that doesn't value defense very much. on most teams he's no more than a 15 mpg player imo.

It_Was_Typed · Post #5 » by **It_Was_Typed** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:45 am

Shot in the face or shot in the nuts?

Clangus · Post #6 » by **Clangus** » Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:41 am

Wilcox wasn't that bad, he just never lived up to the potential. He is a solid backup PF and doen't make too many mistakes. Wilcox by a mile

Swift is injured way to much. Not worth a roster spot.

Post #7 » by **kane2021** » Thu Jul 16, 2009 3:02 am

You got to take wilcox. But he has little desire to be better then he is.