john2jer wrote:KWSN-Men wrote:john2jer wrote:Wow, the twists and turns of bad information keep coming.
Using the example provided, if you apply at American Express and the only option they give you to work is 1000 miles a way, you either take it and move, or you apply for a different company. You have no right to sue because they won't give you a job next door.
If Rubio wants to fulfill his NBA dream, it goes through Minnesota until the Wolves trade his rights. So yeah, he has to play by their rules. Even if he demands a trade, the Wolves aren't required to trade him.
Rubio is free to play basketball all he wants, but if he wants to play in the highest league in the world, he has to accept the rules they've laid down.
That's wrong. If you apply to work at American Express and they say the only place you can work is somewhere you don't want to live, they don't prevent you from ever working again in that same country because you turned them down.
Actualy, you're wrong. American Express would say, "You can't work for us then". You're still allowed to work in the United States, you just go apply at VISA, or MasterCard, or some other company.
Just like in this situation, if Rubio's dream is only to play in the United States, but doesn't desire to work for the company that provides the best pay/marketing ability because he doesn't like the location, then he can go play in the CBA, or ABA, or some other basketball league.
But Rubio's dream is to play in the NBA.
Just like it would be John Doe's dream to work for AmEx, then he needs to take the job they're offering him, if he desires to accomplish that dream.
It's not Ricky Rubio's right to play in the NBA, it's a priviledge that he gets to take advantage of as long as he follows the guidelines laid down by the NBA.
It is sad that so many Americans think like this.