Next Years Roster

krazyboifolyfe · Post #1 » by **krazyboifolyfe** » Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:27 pm

Rondo/Marburay/Hudson
Ray Allen/Daniels/House/J.R
Paul Pierce/Bowen/Walker
KG/Big Baby/Scal
Perkins/Rasheed/Swift
Most Teams Wont Even Be Able To Compete With Our Second Unit

Fencer reregistered · Post #2 » by **Fencer reregistered** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:47 am

krazyboifolyfe wrote:Rondo/Marburay/Hudson
Ray Allen/Daniels/House/J.R
Paul Pierce/Bowen/Walker
KG/Big Baby/Scal
Perkins/Rasheed/Swift
Most Teams Wont Even Be Able To Compete With Our Second Unit

Don't you think it's a little unfair that the Cs will get to have 16 players?

sweatdog · Post #3 » by **sweatdog** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:15 am

Marburay - I knew he was crazy enough to legally change his own name. nice.

bc legends · Post #4 » by **bc legends** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:37 am

no way this is going to be next years exact roster. your one player too many and i dont see how theres going to be enough minutes to go around for some of those second unit players.

Hemingway · Post #5 » by **Hemingway** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 5:13 am

disagree. While I would not bet that is the exact roster, I do believe that is the train of thought our execs are on. you are right in saying most (fine some) teams would not be able to compete with our second string. This is our last year of the big 3 all being prime. Why not go all out? Really why the **** would you not do everything at thing point? I mean seriously. The big 3 know as well s anyone that one title will be looked at as afluke. the great teams win more than one. Too much pressure. We are not going to break the bank but the MD situations proves we dont have to. Next year should have higher expectations than the last 20. So **** yeah, I;m drunk and whoooooooo!!!!!

GreenMachine · Post #6 » by **GreenMachine** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:20 am

HU?

Starbury
Daniels
Bowen
Wallace
Baby

WOULD NOT WIN A SINGLE GAME. Starbury and Bowen are 1/2 way out the league... no one wants them - they are old and five years (or more) past their prime... now as 10th, 11th and 12th men type guys - they are fine - but as starters... they would go 0 for 82.

I have green googles like everyone else here... but you guys are talking crazy.

GuyClinch · Post #7 » by **GuyClinch** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 5:19 pm

Its too early to say what are rosters are going to be. Daniels will likely come in a sign and trade and BBD is rumoured to be traded.. I realize your excited but be realistic.

Tricky Ricky · Post #8 » by **Tricky Ricky** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 5:29 pm

no reason to kill the op hes just excited for the season, Im still excited over our starters lol

yodi184 · Post #9 » by **yodi184** » Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:48 pm

bench depth is a factor all right, but it all boils down to how healthy the starters are and the minutes they would be on the court.. after all you can't play everyone at the same time, aside from the fact that there's the 'jelling'/cohesion aspect

with that said, KG please be healthy this year and win us another championship