Chi/Den/Utah Possibility?

Chicity09 · Post #1 » by **Chicity09** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:28 pm

http://twitter.com/SportsUnplugged
What you guys think.?

jazzrock · Post #2 » by **jazzrock** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:38 pm

I think you should post the damn trade rather than just some link that I have no clue where it goes. Was it really that hard to copy and paste????

Chicity09 · Post #3 » by **Chicity09** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:42 pm

jazzrock wrote:I think you should post the damn trade rather than just some link that I have no clue where it goes. Was it really that hard to copy and paste????

ummm no but is it really hard just to Click the damn Link, and Read.

Xanthis · Post #4 » by **Xanthis** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:03 pm

JR Smith to Utah? Would the Jazz really bring in a guy that has had questionable character? I actually do like the trade but don't know how Tyrus and JR would work with Sloan.

sendai91 · Post #5 » by **sendai91** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:12 pm

So, basically it's JR Smith and Tyrus for Boozer and CJ (who ends up in Denver), from the Jazz perspective. I'm torn, it's fair value for Boozer from a production perspective, and it would be nice to not have to deal with JR lighting us up a few times a year. If we could involve a 4th team ( Houston) who gets JR and we pick up Hayes or Carl Landry, I would like that a little better.

stevebozell · Post #6 » by **stevebozell** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:14 pm

sendai91 wrote:So, basically it's JR Smith and Tyrus for Boozer and CJ (who ends up in Denver), from the Jazz perspective. I'm torn, it's fair value for Boozer from a production perspective, and it would be nice to not have to deal with JR lighting us up a few times a year. If we could involve a 4th team ( Houston) who gets JR and we pick up Hayes or Carl Landry, I would like that a little better.

Why would you want another PF, after just getting Tyrus also?

I would prefer the Jazz trade Boozer for top talent at a different position, and since it seems they cant to that, this seems pretty fair to me.

seejaydeja · Post #7 » by **seejaydeja** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:17 pm

not bad but i wouldn't be surprised if sloan veto'd

HolyToledo · Post #8 » by **HolyToledo** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:22 pm

Good trade for Jazz....Ok for Bulls.....Denver gets crap other than saving some money for not having to pay JR Smith's contract for 2 years. Hard to believe Nuggets want to help Jazz as well.

Does not work under cap! A team with salary cap space may be necessary where they take Miles and throw future #1 to Nuggets.

kamazilla · Post #9 » by **kamazilla** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:23 pm

I like it quite a bit- gives us another serious deep threat and shores up the 4. I really don't see the light going on for CJ in such a way to justify his salary and minutes.

Post #10 » by **DelaneyRudd** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:35 pm

Chicity09 wrote:
jazzrock wrote:I think you should post the damn trade rather than just some link that I have no clue where it goes. Was it really that hard to copy and paste????
ummm no but is it really hard just to Click the damn Link, and Read.

It is when workplaces block social networking sites.

boogydown · Post #11 » by **boogydown** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:02 pm

Source: Forman, Chapman, O’Connor tittered about trading Smith/Thomas to Utah. Boozer to Chicago. Miles/James to Denver.

It sounds like Chicago and Utah are really trying to find a 3rd party to make this work.

Fido · Post #12 » by **Fido** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:13 pm

They must need another team--the trade as listed doesn't work in the trade checker for Denver.

Fido · Post #13 » by **Fido** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:17 pm

DelaneyRudd wrote:
Chicity09 wrote:
jazzrock wrote:I think you should post the damn trade rather than just some link that I have no clue where it goes. Was it really that hard to copy and paste????
ummm no but is it really hard just to Click the damn Link, and Read.

It is when workplaces block social networking sites.

+1

hoops4life · Post #14 » by **hoops4life** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:36 pm

Just paste the whole thing in.

I would do it. I like Smith. I bet he would be fine here under Sloan. I think that too many people blow that out of proportion.

polskikrol3 · Post #15 » by **polskikrol3** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:52 pm

This is just me thinking but why would Denver basically trade JR Smith for CJ Miles and trash? If the tables were turned i think Jazz fans would freak trading JR Smith to a division rival for CJ. Thats just me playing devil's advocate i guess.

Xanthis · Post #16 » by **Xanthis** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:21 pm

polskikrol3 wrote:This is just me thinking but why would Denver basically trade JR Smith for CJ Miles and trash? If the tables were turned i think Jazz fans would freak trading JR Smith to a division rival for CJ. Thats just me playing devil's advocate i guess.

Nuggets coach Karl doesn't get along with Smith at all and why not get someone who could possibly be as good as him in the future while getting some cap relief.

J_Ray · Post #17 » by **J_Ray** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:05 pm

I don't understand how JR Smith would work under Sloan if he hasn't been able to work under Byron Scott and George Karl, who are not as strict. I think there would have to be a 4th team that would take him.

cjs55 · Post #18 » by **cjs55** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:33 pm

Smith would give Sloan a heart attack the first time he shoots a 30 footer at the beginning of the shot clock, which would probably be in the first game he played for us. Of course, he would make the shot, but Sloan would be on the floor before it went in.

outerspacefella · Post #19 » by **outerspacefella** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:48 pm

If KOC make it happen a little bunch of Jazz fans will have to kiss his a$$....
Nuggets just won't do it anyway. Why would they?

HolyToledo · Post #20 » by **HolyToledo** » Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:49 pm

cjs55 wrote:Smith would give Sloan a heart attack the first time he shoots a 30 footer at the beginning of the shot clock, which would probably be in the first game he played for us. Of course, he would make the shot, but Sloan would be on the floor before it went in.

Is this a SLoan problem or a Smith problem? Sloan needs to go a long time ago, but who knows maybe it works.