Suns have to work very hard to foster upcoming young players (Dragic, Lopez, Clark, Tucker, Dudley), work hard thru free agency with CAP restrictions (Nash, Frye, Amare, Hill), and work hard thru doing things the right way.
Let's see, our Roster is full of Sasha, Fish, Walton, Sun Yue Kobe, all players we drafted, We signed got Odom through trade, as well as Pau, so in reality, our rosters are filled with similar drafted players we built and developed, and Trades we did, and we have a few free agents we signed also, course ours actually can play, that's the difference. So piss poor example.
Sunsman44 wrote:Large corporations only get bigger while the small mom-n-pop stores have to suffer.
Lakers are the same way: Luck, a little corporate greed, and unfair trading practices have made them who they are. Not because of talent.
That's that and nobody else can say anything because I have final word.
Your theory might make sense except one word "Clippers" they also are in LA, and could have the same money the Lakers have, but they are a piss poorly run franchise, that has made all the wrong moves, and pay for it over and over. The Lakers are a well run franchise, that has created a great enviroment where players want to come and play. We play by the rules, are rarely the highest spending team, if ever, and just make good decisions,.
Now, the Suns could be like the San Antonio spurs, another small market team that is run well, unlike Phoenix that is a small market team that has made horrible decisions. You have the same rules and trades you can make under those rules, and have chosen to dismantle a team that was on the brink of a championship appearance, and traded away so many good players it's funny, Rondo, Nate Robinson all could have been yours for either keeping the winning going, or trade bait for pieces. You choose to instead make horrible decisions.
So blame it on the "unfair trading" and whine about the players who want to come to what we have built, if you choose, but you sound like a jealous little biotch.