ImageImageImageImageImage

marvin williams

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

User avatar
KM44
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,942
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 17, 2007

Re: marvin williams 

Post#41 » by KM44 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:08 pm

Nicky Nix Nook wrote:In two years:

Thompson > Aldridge
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: marvin williams 

Post#42 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:13 pm

KM44 wrote:I'm glad you're all happy!!! He's gone!!

I'm over it. Now I'll move off of man man-crush/lust according to ICMTM.


Here's something to ease the pain KM44:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNKmHvI1s8o

Let it out man...let it out
User avatar
KM44
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,942
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 17, 2007

Re: marvin williams 

Post#43 » by KM44 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:17 pm

^This is why I keep you around.
Nicky Nix Nook wrote:In two years:

Thompson > Aldridge
User avatar
RoyalCourtJestr
Analyst
Posts: 3,146
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Location: Tyreke Evans/DeMarcus Cousins. That is all.

Re: marvin williams 

Post#44 » by RoyalCourtJestr » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:58 pm

Contract was probably more than we could have afforded. Oh well. Lets focus on the SF we have (either impoving them or gettign rid of them) instead of dwelling on Mr.Potential ;)
mprose wrote:And that leaves me with the conclusion that DMC is the Sarah Palin of the NBA.
User avatar
Draino
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,872
And1: 14
Joined: Jan 09, 2005
     

Re: marvin williams 

Post#45 » by Draino » Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:00 pm

Nicky Nix Nook wrote:
KM44 wrote:I'm glad you're all happy!!! He's gone!!

I'm over it. Now I'll move off of man man-crush/lust according to ICMTM.


Here's something to ease the pain KM44:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNKmHvI1s8o

Let it out man...let it out


lmao that is one of the greatest posts i have seen this year hahahahaha, good one
Image
User avatar
Draino
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,872
And1: 14
Joined: Jan 09, 2005
     

Re: marvin williams 

Post#46 » by Draino » Thu Jul 30, 2009 6:00 pm

i am sad that we didn't get a chance at marvin tho
Image
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

Re: marvin williams 

Post#47 » by ICMTM » Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:52 am

5y/40m is too much, or more than I'm willing to spend on him. At that price he should be an impact player, and I'm not saying he won't be. The risk factor though doesn't do it for me.
KANGZZZZZ!
User avatar
KM44
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,942
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 17, 2007

Re: marvin williams 

Post#48 » by KM44 » Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:29 pm

5 YEARS 40 MILL!?! Okay, well I didn't realize that Atlanta even had the capspace to give him that kind of money. Now I know I have been the largest advocate to get Marvin, but the kings would have to be (Please Use More Appropriate Word) to sign him to that kind of money. I was expecting another team to offer mle and the hawks match immediately, but this was a terrible deal for the Hawks. Right now, he's just a role player, and I wouldn't be surprised if he eventually becomes a great player in this league, but the risk for that kind of money is not worth it.

So this is my official apology for creating at least 3 Marvin Williams threads, my b.
Nicky Nix Nook wrote:In two years:

Thompson > Aldridge
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: marvin williams 

Post#49 » by pillwenney » Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:49 pm

KM44 wrote:5 YEARS 40 MILL!?! Okay, well I didn't realize that Atlanta even had the capspace to give him that kind of money. Now I know I have been the largest advocate to get Marvin, but the kings would have to be (Please Use More Appropriate Word) to sign him to that kind of money. I was expecting another team to offer mle and the hawks match immediately, but this was a terrible deal for the Hawks. Right now, he's just a role player, and I wouldn't be surprised if he eventually becomes a great player in this league, but the risk for that kind of money is not worth it.

So this is my official apology for creating at least 3 Marvin Williams threads, my b.


They didn't need cap space. They had his bird rights.
User avatar
Crimson King
Pro Prospect
Posts: 962
And1: 34
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

Re: marvin williams 

Post#50 » by Crimson King » Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:46 pm

I don't think it's that bad, it's a little risky contract, but I still think he can be a very solid player.

KM44, I like Marvin Williams too :wink: , but there are more important needs right now.

Return to Sacramento Kings