Post#6 » by SDM » Fri Aug 7, 2009 8:00 pm
Alomar is a first-ballot guy.
He's made amends over the spitting incident, and his accomplishments defensively are still fresh in everyone's memory. He was one of the best all-around baseball players I've ever seen. His post-season success is the stuff of legend, just super clutch.
Unfortunately, if you read the major sports writers who have votes, a lot of them get stats-happy right around election time and do some pieces. This is why guys like Jack Morris get votes (most wins in the 80s, yes, but c'mon now) and guys who don't have amazing accomplishments, like Tim Raines, don't stand a chance. Alomar didn't hit 300 home runs and he didn't drive in 1500 runs and he didn't steal 500 bases and he didn't get 3000 hits. Personally, it doesn't matter to me that he didn't do these things. He played with intensity, passion, and had the talent to back it up. That's what should be important.
Like Raines, Alomar was one of the top ten players in the league for a handful of years, but he never dominated the league in any single category (aside from steals with Raines and GG with Alomar). A prime Alomar was a legendary Hall of Famer, but he bounced around to a couple of teams in the latter years of his prime, and then bounced around when he was pretty much done as an everyday player.
Tom Henke came a few years too early. If he pitched well from, say, 1985 to 2000 instead of from 1982 to 1995, he'd be in there. For six years, his ERA+ was 135 one year and between 181 and 190 the other years. That's remarkable. At that time, no one understood the importance of a legit bullpen ace, and the only stat that mattered was saves. Tom Henke was freaking unhittable for most of his career.