ImageImageImageImageImage

Rios claimed on Waivers

Moderator: JaysRule15

SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

Re: Rios claimed on Waivers 

Post#61 » by SportsWorld » Sun Aug 9, 2009 3:18 am

Would Rios sacrafice playing time in order to get on a team that has a shot at the playoffs? Doubt it.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,575
And1: 18,059
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Rios claimed on Waivers 

Post#62 » by Schad » Sun Aug 9, 2009 3:27 am

SportsWorld wrote:Would Rios sacrafice playing time in order to get on a team that has a shot at the playoffs? Doubt it.


Are you suggesting that Rios would lose playing time to Brian Anderson and Scott Podsednik ? I'd doubt it if anyone else posted it, but I suspect that you believe it would be the case.
Image
**** your asterisk.
SportsWorld
RealGM
Posts: 51,601
And1: 133
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:
       

Re: Rios claimed on Waivers 

Post#63 » by SportsWorld » Sun Aug 9, 2009 3:33 am

Schadenfreude wrote:
SportsWorld wrote:Would Rios sacrafice playing time in order to get on a team that has a shot at the playoffs? Doubt it.


Are you suggesting that Rios would lose playing time to Brian Anderson and Scott Podsednik ? I'd doubt it if anyone else posted it, but I suspect that you believe it would be the case.

He certaintly won't get the playing time he got in Toronto if he came over. Podsednik has been pretty good for the Sox in the lead-off spot. The only thing he struggles with is his defense. And Brian Anderson is in Pawtucket with the Red Sox organization now (White Sox traded him for Mark Kotsay). Wise is the backup CF.
Mustard_Tiger
Banned User
Posts: 4,793
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 16, 2009

Re: Rios claimed on Waivers 

Post#64 » by Mustard_Tiger » Sun Aug 9, 2009 3:46 am

Dude, you don't trade for a guy like Rios and stick him on the bench. He'd instantly become one of the better CF's in baseball, and he's making over 11M a season for the next 5 years. Wise and Podsednik are virtual jokes compared to him.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,575
And1: 18,059
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Rios claimed on Waivers 

Post#65 » by Schad » Sun Aug 9, 2009 3:47 am

SportsWorld wrote:
Schadenfreude wrote:
SportsWorld wrote:Would Rios sacrafice playing time in order to get on a team that has a shot at the playoffs? Doubt it.


Are you suggesting that Rios would lose playing time to Brian Anderson and Scott Podsednik ? I'd doubt it if anyone else posted it, but I suspect that you believe it would be the case.

He certaintly won't get the playing time he got in Toronto if he came over. Podsednik has been pretty good for the Sox in the lead-off spot. The only thing he struggles with is his defense. And Brian Anderson is in Pawtucket with the Red Sox organization now (White Sox traded him for Mark Kotsay). Wise is the backup CF.


I'd forgotten the trade, but neither Kotsay nor Podsednik are better than Rios...Kotsay hasn't topped an OPS+ of 91 since 2005, and Podsednik is surviving solely due to a BABIP that he's unlikely to maintain. If either of them got playing time at Rios' expense, it's only because Ozzie Guillen hasn't the slightest clue what he's doing.
Image
**** your asterisk.
Luv 4 da game
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,234
And1: 275
Joined: Mar 27, 2007
Location: Drama Queen Headquarters.

Re: Rios claimed on Waivers 

Post#66 » by Luv 4 da game » Sun Aug 9, 2009 10:57 pm

MGD24 wrote:everyone also needs to realize that Rios has a 'no trade' clause ...
and the no-trade over rides waiver claims. Rios will have to approve any move.


Can anyone else second this claim ?
I Breathe Raptors Basketball
Modern_epic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,458
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 03, 2003

Re: Rios claimed on Waivers 

Post#67 » by Modern_epic » Sun Aug 9, 2009 11:20 pm

I'm fairly sure Rios has a no trade clause. I can't say one way or the other about the waiver claim part... but if you can move a guy that way, it seems like a cheatin' way around a no trade clause.
MGD24
Starter
Posts: 2,360
And1: 47
Joined: Aug 14, 2006
Location: Guelph
Contact:

Re: Rios claimed on Waivers 

Post#68 » by MGD24 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:14 am

A no trade clause "trumps" a waiver claim.

It has to...or else what is the point in having one when a GM could just waive you to get rid of you?

Either way, I don't see anything happening...Rios will still be a Jay until the offseason at least..then JP will try to trade him and be unsuccessful.

Here is a link mentioning the no trade clause;
http://majorleaguejerk.com/2009/08/07/under-the-lights-claiming-alex-rios/
Rios has a full no-trade clause this year and next, so there’s somewhat of a wrench that can be thrown into this whole thing, but for all practical purposes, the Blue Jays have a chance to get out from beneath this contract free and clear.
User avatar
Raider917
Veteran
Posts: 2,700
And1: 770
Joined: Apr 14, 2009
Location: Nova Scotia
       

Re: Rios claimed on Waivers 

Post#69 » by Raider917 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:12 pm

Michael Bradley wrote:Players going through waivers this time of year is standard, but the Jays are in a position now where they may have to sell talent away to save money, so if a player like Rios or Overbay or Downs gets claimed, it is a pretty big deal. At this time last year if Rios got claimed, then I would agree it is just a standard issue and nothing would come out of it, but now I am not so sure.

was anyone else on the jays other than rios put on waivers and not claimed?
YogiStewart
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,006
And1: 6,481
Joined: Aug 08, 2007
Location: Its ALL about Location, Location, Location!

Re: Rios claimed on Waivers 

Post#70 » by YogiStewart » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:27 pm

locked this up due to the news

Return to Toronto Blue Jays