ImageImageImage

The case for Marbury

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

Re: The case for Marbury 

Post#41 » by sully00 » Mon Aug 17, 2009 4:54 pm

Hemingway wrote:Eh the pot video means nothing. Here is my logic: It would mean something in the owners thought that his antics would turn away some fans. It would but those people who hate weed so much they would stop going to celtics games I'm guessing don't watch a ton on online videos. If this made tv as a story than I would agree he really hurt himself.

We have a legendary team shaping up. I hope he comes back.


I think you are missing the point. The issue isn't the weed the issue is that the guy is totally incapable of not being a distraction. He is drama and a legendary team doesn't need drama. This team doesn't need a bench player making noise. Marbs makes noise the rare times he plays well, he makes noise when he sucks, and he makes noise in the middle of the offseason because he is either mentally ill or starved for attention either one makes him useless to this ball club.
Hemingway
Banned User
Posts: 3,725
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 11, 2005

Re: The case for Marbury 

Post#42 » by Hemingway » Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:01 am

You know after watching that video I'm thinking he might not be comming back. I still want him. I personally would risk the headache for the talent, but he seems pretty out there.

2 things:

1. When the Marbury movie comes out I think Tracy Morgan should play him.

2. How great/funny/terrible would it be it we broughtback Marbs and Walker.

Return to Boston Celtics