OT: Does anyone else notice a pattern here?

[nashrambler13]

Call me crazy but I'd rather have him as a starter over Nash, he's a very good defensive player and would be a good guard next to J-Rich.

i honestly dont see how there could be a adequate response for such ludicrous statement...

...

...

yeh, nothing comes to mind.

Who was it that said something along the lines of "He isnt racist, he just hates, nash, lou, dragic, and half of Hill and Lopez"

That was me, and I still stand by that statement.

i laughed so hard when i saw this...

[MaryvalesFinest]

I usually hold my tongue when Maryvale spits out his Nash Hate but seriously you are sounding like an Idiot at this point. Look at the Numbers, Look at the W/L ratio, Listen to what the rest of the world is telling You!!

Nash has some defensive deficiencies which we all acknowledge but even with his flaws he is by far better than Banks, Marbury or anyone else you want to say is better than nash.

Banks did get a chance here, DA actually did play him and he lost a lot of leads for Steve while he was resting his back thats why he lost his minutes. Dudes a career back up if he sticks around at all...

Banks put up some solid stats when he got 30 + minutes per game with the Wolves the year before he signed with the Suns.

[MaryvalesFinest]

Call me crazy but I'd rather have him as a starter over Nash, he's a very good defensive player and would be a good guard next to J-Rich.

Not a smart thing to say...

How so?

[MaryvalesFinest]

Who was it that said something along the lines of "He isnt racist, he just hates, nash, lou, dragic, and half of Hill and Lopez"

That was me, and I still stand by that statement.

Trust me, I'm not racist

[rsavaj]

Call me crazy but I'd rather have him as a starter over Nash, he's a very good defensive player and would be a good guard next to J-Rich.

Not a smart thing to say...

How so?

Well, I think it's just unwise to say on a variety of levels. I think you'll find that every other fan here on RealGM will disagree with you, and now other posters are just going to stop taking your opinions seriously at all. I also think it's "not smart" because I can't imagine how you can really support that statement

[JohnVancouver]

Trust me, I'm not racist

"Now, anyone can tell you I ain't no racialist." - Gov. George Wallace of Alabama

[JohnVancouver]

Just to be clear I don't believe MVF is any kind of racist.

Remember the story about LBJ, who told his campaign staff he was going to spread it around that his opponent in a Texas race, a hog farmer, enjoyed sexual relations with his swine?

"Hell, Lyndon, you can't call the man a pig-f******"
"I'm not going to call him any such thing," the great man answered. "I'm just going to make him deny it."

[Orange_Blooded]

I usually hold my tongue when Maryvale spits out his Nash Hate but seriously you are sounding like an Idiot at this point. Look at the Numbers, Look at the W/L ratio, Listen to what the rest of the world is telling You!!

Nash has some defensive deficiencies which we all acknowledge but even with his flaws he is by far better than Banks, Marbury or anyone else you want to say is better than nash.

Banks did get a chance here, DA actually did play him and he lost a lot of leads for Steve while he was resting his back thats why he lost his minutes. Dudes a career back up if he sticks around at all...

Banks put up some solid stats when he got 30 + minutes per game with the Wolves the year before he signed with the Suns.

I'd be curious to see how the wolves faired in the W/L catagory when he got 30+, im sure It aint pretty.

[Orange_Blooded]

Ok, curiosity got the best of me... they were 9-16 (.36%) in Games banks got 30+.

I know what you're probably thinking.. "The T''wolves sucked that year so of course his W/L % looks bad." If you look a bit closer at the numbers you can see they were 24/33 (.42%) in games he played under 30 min. So based on your argument that 05/06 he was "solid" that would mean he is worse than Marko Jaric & Troy Hudson (Wolves other PG's that year) when it comes to actually being able to lead his team to victory.

Another Argument you may use is that KG missed 4 of the games that Banks got 30+, but the Wolves were 2-2 in those games so that point is moot.

Granted this isn't an entirely scientific argument since there are many variables but the evidence is pretty solid that Banks is a loser if you ask me.

Tally up Nashes W/L ratio when getting 30+ if you want, dont think you'll like what you see.

[BurningHeart]

and now other posters are just going to stop taking your opinions seriously at all.

I think that happened like, two years ago, or whenever this guy's first post was.