ImageImageImageImageImage

The Beginning of the Kings' Decline

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

Travis_Knight
Banned User
Posts: 35
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 07, 2009
Location: Philippines

Re: The Beginning of the Kings' Decline 

Post#41 » by Travis_Knight » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:59 am

:lol: at your top ten
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: The Beginning of the Kings' Decline 

Post#42 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:44 am

Travis_Knight wrote::lol: at your top ten


What a thoughtful and intelligent response.

See you're using a text book defense mechanism. You just got your a** handed to you, so instead of trying to disprove his post you just backed out LIKE an idiot (Mods let the record show I didn't call him an idiot)

Kind of like the kid on the playground who can't think of a comeback so he says "Doo doo head!"
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

Re: The Beginning of the Kings' Decline 

Post#43 » by KingInExile » Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:47 pm

Nicky Nix Nook wrote:
Travis_Knight wrote::lol: at your top ten


What a thoughtful and intelligent response.

See you're using a text book defense mechanism. You just got your a** handed to you, so instead of trying to disprove his post you just backed out LIKE an idiot (Mods let the record show I didn't call him an idiot)

Kind of like the kid on the playground who can't think of a comeback so he says "Doo doo head!"

The line's not that fine. You can do better.

All the C-Webb talk is bringing back a lot of nostalgia. It reminds me of all the heated Webber vs. Peja debates that populated this board when I first came to RealGM. Ahh, those were the days! Of course the thing I remember the most is that those debates often were perpetuated by irrational partisans who had already made up their mind before starting threads. There was never any hope of having a rational debate with them, no chance of an honest and respectful exchange of ideas. No, those threads typically devolved quickly into name calling when the more thick-headed participants quickly realized that they didn't have anything other than "player X good, player Y bad".

Ahh...memories!

Yeah, those debates got old pretty quickly. And the individuals who perpetuated those debates and never could make real arguments to support their opinions...well, they are long gone (either banned or they just gave up).
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.
Travis_Knight
Banned User
Posts: 35
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 07, 2009
Location: Philippines

Re: The Beginning of the Kings' Decline 

Post#44 » by Travis_Knight » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:51 pm

Am i going to get banned because I think the magoofs overpaid webber? If so, the moderators' true colors are showing, evidenced by that yellow streak going down their spine.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,684
And1: 1,363
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: The Beginning of the Kings' Decline 

Post#45 » by OGSactownballer » Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:05 pm

No, you should be banned because you are trying to cause trouble for an illegitimate reason. I have already responded earlier and I would like to see this locked and you suspended for a while to wise you up honestly.
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

Re: The Beginning of the Kings' Decline 

Post#46 » by ICMTM » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:15 pm

Travis_Knight wrote:Am i going to get banned because I think the magoofs overpaid webber? If so, the moderators' true colors are showing, evidenced by that yellow streak going down their spine.


No moderater has threatened you with anything. If you want to continue to sound foolish I will gladly provide you the opportunity. Not having the knowledge to discuss basketball topics is not covered under RealGM's TOS. Trolling is. If you continue down the road you're on it will be considered trolling. Calling out moderators isn't the way to go. Calling out mods in itself can be a violation. Tread lightly. I've already warned other about the way they are treating you. Now I'm warning you to stick to the topic at hand.
KANGZZZZZ!
ICMTM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,347
And1: 176
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Sacramento, Ca
     

Re: The Beginning of the Kings' Decline 

Post#47 » by ICMTM » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:19 pm

OGSactownballer wrote:No, you should be banned because you are trying to cause trouble for an illegitimate reason. I have already responded earlier and I would like to see this locked and you suspended for a while to wise you up honestly.


If he feels Webb's contract is the reason for our decline he's free to support his claim.
KANGZZZZZ!
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: The Beginning of the Kings' Decline 

Post#48 » by Smills91 » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:11 pm

KingInExile wrote:
Nicky Nix Nook wrote:
Travis_Knight wrote::lol: at your top ten


What a thoughtful and intelligent response.

See you're using a text book defense mechanism. You just got your a** handed to you, so instead of trying to disprove his post you just backed out LIKE an idiot (Mods let the record show I didn't call him an idiot)

Kind of like the kid on the playground who can't think of a comeback so he says "Doo doo head!"

The line's not that fine. You can do better.

All the C-Webb talk is bringing back a lot of nostalgia. It reminds me of all the heated Webber vs. Peja debates that populated this board when I first came to RealGM. Ahh, those were the days! Of course the thing I remember the most is that those debates often were perpetuated by irrational partisans who had already made up their mind before starting threads. There was never any hope of having a rational debate with them, no chance of an honest and respectful exchange of ideas. No, those threads typically devolved quickly into name calling when the more thick-headed participants quickly realized that they didn't have anything other than "player X good, player Y bad".

Ahh...memories!

Yeah, those debates got old pretty quickly. And the individuals who perpetuated those debates and never could make real arguments to support their opinions...well, they are long gone (either banned or they just gave up).


Oh Please bring back those days! I'd long for that annoying discussion to return, why? Because we were RELEVANT then. Now we're stuck trying to figure out how to stick a square peg into a round hole....

Return to Sacramento Kings