ImageImageImageImageImage

Its been seven years, can we rationally discuss this now?

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

Travis_Knight
Banned User
Posts: 35
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 07, 2009
Location: Philippines

Its been seven years, can we rationally discuss this now? 

Post#1 » by Travis_Knight » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:46 am

You know what i'm talking about - 2002 Western Conference Finals.

I fully accept the premise that the refs screwed the kings over in game 6. David Stern cares about money and a seven game series makes more money for the league. Game 6 was a travesty, but games 2 and 5 taken together were much worse.

First, the lakers crushed the kings in game one. Then in game 2 Kobe got poisoned by the hotel staff and shaq was called for some ticky tack fouls causing him to eventually foul out. Floppy divac made a mockery of the refs in game 5. Floppy wouldn't even attempt to play defense on shaq, he would just flop all over the court and the refs gave him the calls. If floppy divac didn't get shaq in foul trouble in games 2 and 5 the lakers would have finished the kings off in 5 games and game 6 would'nt have even been necessary.

I suspect after game one stern figured the lakers would sweep the kings so he told the refs to give game 2 to the kings. They split the next two, then stern wanted the series to go seven games so he gave game 5 to the kings and game 6 to the lakers. Game 7 was fairly officiated and the kings choked.
User avatar
tru6playa
Pro Prospect
Posts: 905
And1: 103
Joined: Aug 09, 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
     

Re: Its been seven years, can we rationally discuss this now? 

Post#2 » by tru6playa » Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:06 am

Travis_Knight wrote:You know what i'm talking about - 2002 Western Conference Finals.

I fully accept the premise that the refs screwed the kings over in game 6. David Stern cares about money and a seven game series makes more money for the league. Game 6 was a travesty, but games 2 and 5 taken together were much worse.

First, the lakers crushed the kings in game one. Then in game 2 Kobe got poisoned by the hotel staff and shaq was called for some ticky tack fouls causing him to eventually foul out. Floppy divac made a mockery of the refs in game 5. Floppy wouldn't even attempt to play defense on shaq, he would just flop all over the court and the refs gave him the calls. If floppy divac didn't get shaq in foul trouble in games 2 and 5 the lakers would have finished the kings off in 5 games and game 6 would'nt have even been necessary.

I suspect after game one stern figured the lakers would sweep the kings so he told the refs to give game 2 to the kings. They split the next two, then stern wanted the series to go seven games so he gave game 5 to the kings and game 6 to the lakers. Game 7 was fairly officiated and the kings choked.


You can't request to discuss an issue "rationally" and have a troll-like tone throughout your post. Why hasn't a mod suspended/banned this clown? He's making a mockery of trolling with his trolling in disguise.
bennith13 wrote:We are going to win. Sac can not compete with our offer our or owners or our arena plan. They just don't have their act together like we do at this point in time.


Supersonics41 wrote:This thing is over for Sacramento! Well they might get the return of the Monarch's.
diogo_pt
Pro Prospect
Posts: 874
And1: 17
Joined: Jun 15, 2008
   

Re: Its been seven years, can we rationally discuss this now? 

Post#3 » by diogo_pt » Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:52 pm

can any mod suspend this guy? seriously...
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: Its been seven years, can we rationally discuss this now? 

Post#4 » by Smills91 » Sat Sep 12, 2009 4:09 pm

It'd be hard enough for Stern to fix ONE game(i.e. Game 6) let alone SIX GAMES OF A SEVEN GAME SERIES? mean that's a large conspiracy theorist idea right there. You may want to check in to a shrink for your own 'rational dialogue' on the matter.
Travis_Knight
Banned User
Posts: 35
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 07, 2009
Location: Philippines

Re: Its been seven years, can we rationally discuss this now? 

Post#5 » by Travis_Knight » Sat Sep 12, 2009 4:41 pm

No, i said stern fixed 3 games (2, 5, and 6). I guess you guys aren't ready to rationally discuss this subject. Instead of debating the issues you have chosen to personally attack the OP. This is called an ad hominen attack, or in your case, ad homoman.
User avatar
Wolfay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 7,656
And1: 649
Joined: Aug 13, 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
       

Re: Its been seven years, can we rationally discuss this now? 

Post#6 » by Wolfay » Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:31 pm

One must have a rather miserable life to go on a trolling spree.
Image
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: Its been seven years, can we rationally discuss this now? 

Post#7 » by Smills91 » Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:41 pm

Mitch, get rid of this derelict.
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: Its been seven years, can we rationally discuss this now? 

Post#8 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:51 pm

Travis_Knight wrote:No, i said stern fixed 3 games (2, 5, and 6). I guess you guys aren't ready to rationally discuss this subject. Instead of debating the issues you have chosen to personally attack the OP. This is called an ad hominen attack, or in your case, ad homoman.


holy sh** someone went to jr college! Very impressive!
User avatar
KingInExile
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,416
And1: 4
Joined: May 25, 2004
Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.

Re: Its been seven years, can we rationally discuss this now? 

Post#9 » by KingInExile » Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:05 pm

Well, I've seen enough of this guy to know that the only honor he deserves is the honor of placement onto my ignore list. Who's with me?
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.

Return to Sacramento Kings