Trade Landry+Cook for Bibby?

dartherus · Post #1 » by **dartherus** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:26 pm

The salaries should match...do you see it possible, convenient?
If this happens, Brooks could be traded later for a young, athletic REALLY tall guy...don't you think?

Thanks in advance for any fact or clarification I'm not aware of that would make this unlikely....

RoxFan08 · Post #2 » by **RoxFan08** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:08 pm

If Bibby is expiring this year, it's a possibility. If not, I would think the Rockets would stick with Brooks/Lowry.

MaxRider · Post #3 » by **MaxRider** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:50 pm

bibby just signed a new contract
he can't be traded now

why atlanta do this?
they got whole bunches of forwards

KiDdFrESh · Post #4 » by **KiDdFrESh** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:18 pm

Why would we do this? Is Bibby going to put us over the top? Didnt think so.

moofs · Post #5 » by **moofs** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:36 pm

Negative.

HTown_TMac · Post #6 » by **HTown_TMac** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:45 pm

a year late

YoungMoney23 · Post #7 » by **YoungMoney23** » Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:30 pm

a step backwards for both teams

Ribalding · Post #8 » by **Ribalding** » Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:16 am

The rare and elusive "both teams say haha" trade proposal.

Quiet. You don't want to scare it away. These chances don't come around too often. You should feel privileged.

Munchlaxatives · Post #9 » by **Munchlaxatives** » Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:44 am

MaxRider wrote:why atlanta do this?
they got whole bunches of forwards

Isn't that their draft strategy?

Highflyer3 · Post #10 » by **Highflyer3** » Tue Sep 22, 2009 2:42 am

Why in the hell would we do this?

Post #11 » by **TMACFORMVP** » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:32 am

I mean, sure value wise, it's not that bad. But it's somewhat pointless, we want to develop Brooks, and are pleased by what Lowry brings off the bench -- bringing in a long term veteran on a team that's likely going with a more youthful running approach, Bibby just wouldn't make sense.