ImageImageImageImageImage

Quick question

Moderators: Kilroy, Danny Darko, TyCobb

User avatar
Dalakerbox
Junior
Posts: 362
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
Contact:

Quick question 

Post#1 » by Dalakerbox » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:33 pm

During this off season has anyone heard why the Lakers and Rockets didn't just execute a trade of Artest and Ariza to save the MLE which could have really helped both teams improve (mostly Houston). If Houston had their MLE the could have offered David Lee more money for the one year than New York is offering, or could have gone after someone else that they could have later used as a trade piece to get a true big over in Houston. I mean I like our off season move, and think we are really really strong but Nate Robinson and Sessions were still waiting for a team. I'm just saying. Or does it not even matter and I just need something to talk about suffering from lack of BBall info?
“If this is his team, that means no more coming into camp fat/out of shape, no more blaming others for our team’s failure, my team doesn’t mean only when we win it means carrying the burden of defeat just as gracefully as you carry a championship trophy.”
Slava
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 61,128
And1: 33,800
Joined: Oct 15, 2006
     

Re: Quick question 

Post#2 » by Slava » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:38 pm

We had no use of MLE money and we did not have to help them get someone after going through 7 games in the playoffs.
:king: + :angry: = :wizard:
User avatar
Dalakerbox
Junior
Posts: 362
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 30, 2008
Contact:

Re: Quick question 

Post#3 » by Dalakerbox » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:38 pm

I could live with that reply hahahaha
“If this is his team, that means no more coming into camp fat/out of shape, no more blaming others for our team’s failure, my team doesn’t mean only when we win it means carrying the burden of defeat just as gracefully as you carry a championship trophy.”
DubaLakers
Banned User
Posts: 3,830
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 02, 2007
Location: OC, CA

Re: Quick question 

Post#4 » by DubaLakers » Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:53 pm

It's just beyond sick that LAL have Lamar coming off the bench with a more loaded starting 5, this year LAL should be a heavy favorite. Meanwhile either CLE or ORL is gonna be bloodied by BOS and the team that doesn't go thru BOS will liekly meet LAL in the final. I think it's a CLE V. LAL Final. BOS to me will be like DET from a few years ago, just will lose steam in the playoffs due to age. I'd prefer to see BOS for the revenge factor, but I think age will finally catch them.
User avatar
lakersfanatic
Pro Prospect
Posts: 989
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 08, 2008

Re: Quick question 

Post#5 » by lakersfanatic » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:14 pm

I think it was such a quick decision thing that they didn't have time to really think things thru. Artest for cheap?? The spontaneous transaction even caught ariza off guard. Plus the rockets would have benefitted more with their MLE then we would have...Mcgrady looks like hes coming back full throttle.. we don't want to improve their roster anymore hehe.
User avatar
LA-LA-Land
Junior
Posts: 464
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 04, 2005

Re: Quick question 

Post#6 » by LA-LA-Land » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:19 pm

DubaLakers wrote:It's just beyond sick that LAL have Lamar coming off the bench with a more loaded starting 5, this year LAL should be a heavy favorite. Meanwhile either CLE or ORL is gonna be bloodied by BOS and the team that doesn't go thru BOS will liekly meet LAL in the final. I think it's a CLE V. LAL Final. BOS to me will be like DET from a few years ago, just will lose steam in the playoffs due to age. I'd prefer to see BOS for the revenge factor, but I think age will finally catch them.


Now, now. Let's not get too cocky. We have to go through a loaded WC as well. It should be a bloody (yet highly entertaining) playoff race this year! :D
Image
User avatar
Pablo Escobar
Head Coach
Posts: 7,284
And1: 4,767
Joined: May 13, 2009
Location: Medellín
 

Re: Quick question 

Post#7 » by Pablo Escobar » Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:48 pm

Lakers n Spurs in the wcf and we always hand it to them no bruce bowen to cover kobe if thats what u call 2 yrs ago when he destroyed him they are always a threat but were a deeper team and i hope we get celtics after that embarassin loss to them i wud luv to sweep them
Plata o Plomo?
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Quick question 

Post#8 » by dockingsched » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:36 am

trade doesn't work straight up. different players would need to be added, mitch said it wasn't worth the trouble. they couldn't risk anything going wrong.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
Gus McCrae
General Manager
Posts: 8,263
And1: 2,069
Joined: Dec 07, 2007
     

Re: Quick question 

Post#9 » by Gus McCrae » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:44 am

I heard Mitch talk about it 710 with mason/ireland, he said that once you decide to do sign and trade instead of FA signing, things get complicated and then you're relying on the both FA's, the other team's front office and both agents to all work together. HOU could throw a monkey wrench in if they want, not to mention someone else could come in and offer a better deal for Artest. With what Artest wanted, the FA signing was the best way to ensure we got him.
That Nicka
Banned User
Posts: 15,350
And1: 34
Joined: Jun 28, 2005
Location: USC

Re: Quick question 

Post#10 » by That Nicka » Wed Sep 23, 2009 1:42 am

dcash4 wrote:trade doesn't work straight up.


why not? if they both signed for MLE type money (maybe a bit more) why would other players have to be added.... It would have been sick if we could have gotten Artest and then sign Sessions with MLE lol... I know I'm greedy but Sessions is going to be hella good
User avatar
dockingsched
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 56,660
And1: 23,966
Joined: Aug 02, 2005
     

Re: Quick question 

Post#11 » by dockingsched » Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:31 am

it didn't work because ariza's big raise made him byc.
"We must try not to sink beneath our anguish, Harry, but battle on." - Dumbledore
ShowtimeFan
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,467
And1: 63
Joined: Oct 07, 2007
Location: Floor seats next to Jack

Re: Quick question 

Post#12 » by ShowtimeFan » Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:23 am

SoCAL24 wrote:I heard Mitch talk about it 710 with mason/ireland, he said that once you decide to do sign and trade instead of FA signing, things get complicated and then you're relying on the both FA's, the other team's front office and both agents to all work together. HOU could throw a monkey wrench in if they want, not to mention someone else could come in and offer a better deal for Artest. With what Artest wanted, the FA signing was the best way to ensure we got him.


I heard the same interview and this is exactly what Mitch said, I also suspect that this was a way for Mitch to screw with Ariza's Agent as well, but Mitch would never go on record as saying such a thing!
User avatar
Mamba Venom
RealGM
Posts: 17,979
And1: 582
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Quick question 

Post#13 » by Mamba Venom » Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:27 am

If we did it that way Artest would have made nearly 3 mil more per. Artest is mad at the Rockets over this... I think it was the Lakers idea. .. this might be the time bomb
Lakers are 22-3 in OT last 6 seasons:Kobe best OT closer!
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,691
And1: 31,935
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Quick question 

Post#14 » by Dr Aki » Wed Sep 23, 2009 1:31 pm

ariza was byc and contracts wouldve hard to matchup...

rockets didnt even use their MLE, they used an injury exception, they had no interest in helping the lakers retain their MLE even if it was cosmetic in nature
Image
joe.linnen
Banned User
Posts: 3,272
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 25, 2006
Location: Fresno

Re: Quick question 

Post#15 » by joe.linnen » Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:48 pm

I would have loved to do a S&T for Artest and Ariza. Savings us our MLE for another player would have been nice. I liked the idea of Sessions or Robinson a lot. Oh well water under the bridge....
joe.linnen
Banned User
Posts: 3,272
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 25, 2006
Location: Fresno

Re: Quick question 

Post#16 » by joe.linnen » Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:54 pm

I would have loved to do a S&T for Artest and Ariza. Savings us our MLE for another player would have been nice. I liked the idea of Sessions or Robinson a lot. Oh well water under the bridge....

Return to Los Angeles Lakers