Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- Tim_Hardawayy
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,803
- And1: 10,546
- Joined: Sep 17, 2008
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Based on this thread, I fully expect Anthony Randolph to be a top 10 player in the NBA by the end of next season, with the possibility to sneak into the top 5 the year after. Also, the Warriors WILL make the playoffs, there is no way they aren't with an already talented roster and now a top 10 player.
Beasley is likely headed the way of Derrick Coleman, and will be out of the league within the next 5 years.
Beasley is likely headed the way of Derrick Coleman, and will be out of the league within the next 5 years.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
Jimmy76
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,548
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 01, 2009
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
oaktownwarriors87 wrote:miamiballer wrote:im still trying to figure out what randolph has proved exactly
Once you and Wade2k7 watch one of his games I'm sure you will start to get it.
Ive watched his games
I dont see an Erving/Magic hybrid
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- 5DOM
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 40,216
- And1: 1,811
- Joined: Aug 30, 2004
- Contact:
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- oaktownwarriors87
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,862
- And1: 4,421
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
I love how you guys blow everything we say WAY out of proportion, just shows where you guys are at in the argument.
cdubbz wrote:Donte DiVincenzo will outplay Poole this season.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
Jimmy76
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,548
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 01, 2009
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
oaktownwarriors87 wrote:I love how you guys blow everything we say WAY out of proportion, just shows where you guys are at in the argument.
What do you expect Beasley and Randolph to average in their primes then so we have a good idea of how good youre expecting them to be
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
NetsForce
- Banned User
- Posts: 20,711
- And1: 30
- Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Prime Randolph:
26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%
Prime Beasley:
16.8 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 1.2 apg, 0.5 spg, 0.5 bpg, FG% = 47.5%, 3PT% = 40.1%, FT% = 78.0%
26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%
Prime Beasley:
16.8 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 1.2 apg, 0.5 spg, 0.5 bpg, FG% = 47.5%, 3PT% = 40.1%, FT% = 78.0%
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
ARownsBeasley
- Banned User
- Posts: 85
- And1: 0
- Joined: Sep 08, 2009
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
what about your boy yi? what does his prime look like?
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- WadeKnicks2010
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,871
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jan 14, 2008
- Location: NYC
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
NetsForce wrote:Prime Randolph:
26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%
Eh... Since Heat fans are going around declaring that Beasley will avg 37/12/8 in his prime I guess this doesn't look so bad in comparison.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- Wade2k6
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,104
- And1: 77
- Joined: May 29, 2004
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
WadeKnicks2010 wrote:NetsForce wrote:Prime Randolph:
26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%
Eh... Since CaneDynasty are going around declaring that Beasley will avg 37/12/8 in his prime I guess this doesn't look so bad in comparison.
Right. Well there's nothing like using one guys opinion and acting as if the entire Heat fan base feels that way.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
BBallFreak
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 57,545
- And1: 18,799
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
WadeKnicks2010 wrote:NetsForce wrote:Prime Randolph:
26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%
Eh... Since Heat fans are going around declaring that Beasley will avg 37/12/8 in his prime I guess this doesn't look so bad in comparison.
Don't generalize because of one ridiculous joke account.
I'd take Beasley over Randolph, but I'm no homer...
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- Coxy
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,574
- And1: 15,021
- Joined: Jun 17, 2008
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:Based on this thread, I fully expect Anthony Randolph to be a top 10 player in the NBA by the end of next season, with the possibility to sneak into the top 5 the year after. Also, the Warriors WILL make the playoffs, there is no way they aren't with an already talented roster and now a top 10 player.
Beasley is likely headed the way of Derrick Coleman, and will be out of the league within the next 5 years.
Finally, a Miami fan gets it.
Thanks for clarifying.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
BBallFreak
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 57,545
- And1: 18,799
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Coxy wrote:Tim_Hardawayy wrote:Based on this thread, I fully expect Anthony Randolph to be a top 10 player in the NBA by the end of next season, with the possibility to sneak into the top 5 the year after. Also, the Warriors WILL make the playoffs, there is no way they aren't with an already talented roster and now a top 10 player.
Beasley is likely headed the way of Derrick Coleman, and will be out of the league within the next 5 years.
Finally, a Miami fan gets it.
Thanks for clarifying.
Sarcasm aside, he makes a valid point. The Warriors, with all their talent, damn well better do something, with AR being a key component, for anyone to take this crap seriously. Of course, team success with a strong contribution from a young player means nothing. If it did, Beasley wouldn't be so ridiculously and vastly underrated in this thread.
I guess AR can keep up his stellar 7 ppg average on a team 30 games below .500, then...
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- Coxy
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,574
- And1: 15,021
- Joined: Jun 17, 2008
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
BBallFreak wrote:Coxy wrote:Tim_Hardawayy wrote:Based on this thread, I fully expect Anthony Randolph to be a top 10 player in the NBA by the end of next season, with the possibility to sneak into the top 5 the year after. Also, the Warriors WILL make the playoffs, there is no way they aren't with an already talented roster and now a top 10 player.
Beasley is likely headed the way of Derrick Coleman, and will be out of the league within the next 5 years.
Finally, a Miami fan gets it.
Thanks for clarifying.
Sarcasm aside, he makes a valid point. The Warriors, with all their talent, damn well better do something, with AR being a key component, for anyone to take this crap seriously. Of course, team success with a strong contribution from a young player means nothing. If it did, Beasley wouldn't be so ridiculously and vastly underrated in this thread.
I guess AR can keep up his stellar 7 ppg average on a team 30 games below .500, then...
Well, the Warriors org is in serious disaray with Jax and Monta's poison spreading. Unless we sort it all out soon or the franchise changes ownership/FO staff then we'll never see the best in AR, which will suck.
and the ONLY reason your team is over .500 dude is because of Mr Wade, NOT Beasley. Dont make out as if MB had anything to do with your win/loss column. AR and MB are both very young and NOT team leaders responsible for their respective teams fortunes.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
Jimmy76
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,548
- And1: 9
- Joined: May 01, 2009
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
NetsForce wrote:Prime Randolph:
26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%
Prime Beasley:
16.8 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 1.2 apg, 0.5 spg, 0.5 bpg, FG% = 47.5%, 3PT% = 40.1%, FT% = 78.0%
Glad we have some measure of the homerism levels surrounding Randolph
Now what do you guys expect him to average next year?
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
JimmyTD3
- Banned User
- Posts: 4,419
- And1: 1,641
- Joined: Aug 17, 2003
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
BBallFreak wrote:I guess AR can keep up his stellar 7 ppg average on a team 30 games below .500, then...
Yes, because what he averaged in 19 mpg his rookie year is a great indicator of future success.
Also, he averaged 7.9 PPG, i think it would be fair to round up to 8.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- Coxy
- RealGM
- Posts: 48,574
- And1: 15,021
- Joined: Jun 17, 2008
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Jimmy76 wrote:NetsForce wrote:Prime Randolph:
26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%
Prime Beasley:
16.8 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 1.2 apg, 0.5 spg, 0.5 bpg, FG% = 47.5%, 3PT% = 40.1%, FT% = 78.0%
Glad we have some measure of the homerism levels surrounding Randolph
Now what do you guys expect him to average next year?
How can someone be a homer on a guy that doesnt even play for the team he supports. He's a Nets fan, that thinks a Golden State player will be great. NOT homerism at all. A little far fetched yes, but not a homer.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
BROWN
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,955
- And1: 74
- Joined: Oct 06, 2006
- Location: RealCity - MTL
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Netsforce was being sarcastic, well see how things transpire this year. Randolph as shown those pictures look like he's 7'0, so I guess some of you guys feel stupid. Next up, showing Beasley off this year, and I guess our work here is done.
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
ARownsBeasley
- Banned User
- Posts: 85
- And1: 0
- Joined: Sep 08, 2009
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
BBallFreak wrote:Coxy wrote:Tim_Hardawayy wrote:Based on this thread, I fully expect Anthony Randolph to be a top 10 player in the NBA by the end of next season, with the possibility to sneak into the top 5 the year after. Also, the Warriors WILL make the playoffs, there is no way they aren't with an already talented roster and now a top 10 player.
Beasley is likely headed the way of Derrick Coleman, and will be out of the league within the next 5 years.
Finally, a Miami fan gets it.
Thanks for clarifying.
Sarcasm aside, he makes a valid point. The Warriors, with all their talent, damn well better do something, with AR being a key component, for anyone to take this crap seriously. Of course, team success with a strong contribution from a young player means nothing. If it did, Beasley wouldn't be so ridiculously and vastly underrated in this thread.
I guess AR can keep up his stellar 7 ppg average on a team 30 games below .500, then...
i smell a homer that doesn't have NBA season pass
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
- 5Strong
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 800
- And1: 1
- Joined: Apr 06, 2009
- Location: San Francisco, Ca
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
-
BBallFreak
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 57,545
- And1: 18,799
- Joined: Jun 23, 2001
-
Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley
Coxy wrote:and the ONLY reason your team is over .500 dude is because of Mr Wade, NOT Beasley. Dont make out as if MB had anything to do with your win/loss column. AR and MB are both very young and NOT team leaders responsible for their respective teams fortunes.
Beasley averaged 20 and 9 while Miami was jockeying for playoff position in April. He very definitely had something to do with where we wound up. Was he the go to guy? Certainly not, but he certainly was a team leader for that stretch of games. Everyone starts somewhere. Wade wasn't Miami's leader at first, either...








