Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley

Moderators: penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ, trex_8063

Who will be the better player?

Anthony Randolph
188
46%
Michael Beasley
217
54%
 
Total votes: 405

User avatar
Tim_Hardawayy
RealGM
Posts: 30,803
And1: 10,546
Joined: Sep 17, 2008

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#281 » by Tim_Hardawayy » Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:15 pm

Based on this thread, I fully expect Anthony Randolph to be a top 10 player in the NBA by the end of next season, with the possibility to sneak into the top 5 the year after. Also, the Warriors WILL make the playoffs, there is no way they aren't with an already talented roster and now a top 10 player.

Beasley is likely headed the way of Derrick Coleman, and will be out of the league within the next 5 years.
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#282 » by Jimmy76 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:21 pm

oaktownwarriors87 wrote:
miamiballer wrote:im still trying to figure out what randolph has proved exactly


Once you and Wade2k7 watch one of his games I'm sure you will start to get it.


Ive watched his games

I dont see an Erving/Magic hybrid
User avatar
5DOM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,216
And1: 1,811
Joined: Aug 30, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#283 » by 5DOM » Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:21 pm

No. I just expect the 7 footer to be better than Supercool
Image
User avatar
oaktownwarriors87
RealGM
Posts: 13,862
And1: 4,421
Joined: Mar 01, 2005
 

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#284 » by oaktownwarriors87 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:32 pm

I love how you guys blow everything we say WAY out of proportion, just shows where you guys are at in the argument.
cdubbz wrote:Donte DiVincenzo will outplay Poole this season.
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#285 » by Jimmy76 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:47 pm

oaktownwarriors87 wrote:I love how you guys blow everything we say WAY out of proportion, just shows where you guys are at in the argument.


What do you expect Beasley and Randolph to average in their primes then so we have a good idea of how good youre expecting them to be
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 30
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#286 » by NetsForce » Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:55 pm

Prime Randolph:

26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%

Prime Beasley:

16.8 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 1.2 apg, 0.5 spg, 0.5 bpg, FG% = 47.5%, 3PT% = 40.1%, FT% = 78.0%
ARownsBeasley
Banned User
Posts: 85
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 08, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#287 » by ARownsBeasley » Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:57 pm

what about your boy yi? what does his prime look like?
User avatar
WadeKnicks2010
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,871
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 14, 2008
Location: NYC

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#288 » by WadeKnicks2010 » Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:11 am

NetsForce wrote:Prime Randolph:

26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%



Eh... Since Heat fans are going around declaring that Beasley will avg 37/12/8 in his prime I guess this doesn't look so bad in comparison.
User avatar
Wade2k6
RealGM
Posts: 15,104
And1: 77
Joined: May 29, 2004
 

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#289 » by Wade2k6 » Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:16 am

WadeKnicks2010 wrote:
NetsForce wrote:Prime Randolph:

26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%



Eh... Since CaneDynasty are going around declaring that Beasley will avg 37/12/8 in his prime I guess this doesn't look so bad in comparison.

Right. Well there's nothing like using one guys opinion and acting as if the entire Heat fan base feels that way.
BBallFreak
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,545
And1: 18,799
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
   

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#290 » by BBallFreak » Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:17 am

WadeKnicks2010 wrote:
NetsForce wrote:Prime Randolph:

26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%



Eh... Since Heat fans are going around declaring that Beasley will avg 37/12/8 in his prime I guess this doesn't look so bad in comparison.

Don't generalize because of one ridiculous joke account.

I'd take Beasley over Randolph, but I'm no homer...
User avatar
Coxy
RealGM
Posts: 48,574
And1: 15,021
Joined: Jun 17, 2008
   

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#291 » by Coxy » Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:31 am

Tim_Hardawayy wrote:Based on this thread, I fully expect Anthony Randolph to be a top 10 player in the NBA by the end of next season, with the possibility to sneak into the top 5 the year after. Also, the Warriors WILL make the playoffs, there is no way they aren't with an already talented roster and now a top 10 player.

Beasley is likely headed the way of Derrick Coleman, and will be out of the league within the next 5 years.


Finally, a Miami fan gets it.

Thanks for clarifying.
BBallFreak
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,545
And1: 18,799
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
   

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#292 » by BBallFreak » Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:42 am

Coxy wrote:
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:Based on this thread, I fully expect Anthony Randolph to be a top 10 player in the NBA by the end of next season, with the possibility to sneak into the top 5 the year after. Also, the Warriors WILL make the playoffs, there is no way they aren't with an already talented roster and now a top 10 player.

Beasley is likely headed the way of Derrick Coleman, and will be out of the league within the next 5 years.


Finally, a Miami fan gets it.

Thanks for clarifying.

Sarcasm aside, he makes a valid point. The Warriors, with all their talent, damn well better do something, with AR being a key component, for anyone to take this crap seriously. Of course, team success with a strong contribution from a young player means nothing. If it did, Beasley wouldn't be so ridiculously and vastly underrated in this thread.

I guess AR can keep up his stellar 7 ppg average on a team 30 games below .500, then...
User avatar
Coxy
RealGM
Posts: 48,574
And1: 15,021
Joined: Jun 17, 2008
   

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#293 » by Coxy » Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:53 am

BBallFreak wrote:
Coxy wrote:
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:Based on this thread, I fully expect Anthony Randolph to be a top 10 player in the NBA by the end of next season, with the possibility to sneak into the top 5 the year after. Also, the Warriors WILL make the playoffs, there is no way they aren't with an already talented roster and now a top 10 player.

Beasley is likely headed the way of Derrick Coleman, and will be out of the league within the next 5 years.


Finally, a Miami fan gets it.

Thanks for clarifying.

Sarcasm aside, he makes a valid point. The Warriors, with all their talent, damn well better do something, with AR being a key component, for anyone to take this crap seriously. Of course, team success with a strong contribution from a young player means nothing. If it did, Beasley wouldn't be so ridiculously and vastly underrated in this thread.

I guess AR can keep up his stellar 7 ppg average on a team 30 games below .500, then...


Well, the Warriors org is in serious disaray with Jax and Monta's poison spreading. Unless we sort it all out soon or the franchise changes ownership/FO staff then we'll never see the best in AR, which will suck.

and the ONLY reason your team is over .500 dude is because of Mr Wade, NOT Beasley. Dont make out as if MB had anything to do with your win/loss column. AR and MB are both very young and NOT team leaders responsible for their respective teams fortunes.
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#294 » by Jimmy76 » Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:00 am

NetsForce wrote:Prime Randolph:

26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%

Prime Beasley:

16.8 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 1.2 apg, 0.5 spg, 0.5 bpg, FG% = 47.5%, 3PT% = 40.1%, FT% = 78.0%


Glad we have some measure of the homerism levels surrounding Randolph

Now what do you guys expect him to average next year?
JimmyTD3
Banned User
Posts: 4,419
And1: 1,641
Joined: Aug 17, 2003

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#295 » by JimmyTD3 » Wed Sep 30, 2009 3:07 am

BBallFreak wrote:I guess AR can keep up his stellar 7 ppg average on a team 30 games below .500, then...


Yes, because what he averaged in 19 mpg his rookie year is a great indicator of future success.

Also, he averaged 7.9 PPG, i think it would be fair to round up to 8.
User avatar
Coxy
RealGM
Posts: 48,574
And1: 15,021
Joined: Jun 17, 2008
   

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#296 » by Coxy » Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:06 am

Jimmy76 wrote:
NetsForce wrote:Prime Randolph:

26.4 ppg, 12.7 rpg, 5.10 apg, 1.97 spg, 2.93 bpg, FG% = 53.3%, 3PT% = 36.7%, FT% = 81.6%

Prime Beasley:

16.8 ppg, 6.6 rpg, 1.2 apg, 0.5 spg, 0.5 bpg, FG% = 47.5%, 3PT% = 40.1%, FT% = 78.0%


Glad we have some measure of the homerism levels surrounding Randolph

Now what do you guys expect him to average next year?


How can someone be a homer on a guy that doesnt even play for the team he supports. He's a Nets fan, that thinks a Golden State player will be great. NOT homerism at all. A little far fetched yes, but not a homer.
BROWN
RealGM
Posts: 10,955
And1: 74
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: RealCity - MTL

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#297 » by BROWN » Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:11 am

Netsforce was being sarcastic, well see how things transpire this year. Randolph as shown those pictures look like he's 7'0, so I guess some of you guys feel stupid. Next up, showing Beasley off this year, and I guess our work here is done.
ARownsBeasley
Banned User
Posts: 85
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 08, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#298 » by ARownsBeasley » Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:59 am

BBallFreak wrote:
Coxy wrote:
Tim_Hardawayy wrote:Based on this thread, I fully expect Anthony Randolph to be a top 10 player in the NBA by the end of next season, with the possibility to sneak into the top 5 the year after. Also, the Warriors WILL make the playoffs, there is no way they aren't with an already talented roster and now a top 10 player.

Beasley is likely headed the way of Derrick Coleman, and will be out of the league within the next 5 years.


Finally, a Miami fan gets it.

Thanks for clarifying.

Sarcasm aside, he makes a valid point. The Warriors, with all their talent, damn well better do something, with AR being a key component, for anyone to take this crap seriously. Of course, team success with a strong contribution from a young player means nothing. If it did, Beasley wouldn't be so ridiculously and vastly underrated in this thread.

I guess AR can keep up his stellar 7 ppg average on a team 30 games below .500, then...




i smell a homer that doesn't have NBA season pass
User avatar
5Strong
Pro Prospect
Posts: 800
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 06, 2009
Location: San Francisco, Ca

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#299 » by 5Strong » Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:52 am

Image
BBallFreak
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,545
And1: 18,799
Joined: Jun 23, 2001
   

Re: Anthony Randolph vs. Michael Beasley 

Post#300 » by BBallFreak » Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:22 am

Coxy wrote:and the ONLY reason your team is over .500 dude is because of Mr Wade, NOT Beasley. Dont make out as if MB had anything to do with your win/loss column. AR and MB are both very young and NOT team leaders responsible for their respective teams fortunes.

Beasley averaged 20 and 9 while Miami was jockeying for playoff position in April. He very definitely had something to do with where we wound up. Was he the go to guy? Certainly not, but he certainly was a team leader for that stretch of games. Everyone starts somewhere. Wade wasn't Miami's leader at first, either...

Return to Player Comparisons