Build an NBA Team (BaNT) - discussion

SamBone · Post #141 » by **SamBone** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:40 pm

Cellar is a lock for the win future category!

O wait that is another game, O well!

joking buddy!

Post #142 » by **Snakebites** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:43 pm

CellarDoor wrote:I had a write-up for Okafor. Two for Rose, and one for about four other guys. Not a bad selection at all Bness

You tortured the poor guy in deliberation. He was sitting on AIM talking about how scared he was that you'd take him. I didn't help, mind you. I was quick to inform him it was fairly likely you'd go big. :lol:

Post #143 » by **CellarDoor** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:43 pm

SamBone wrote:Cellar is a lock for the win future category!

O wait that is another game, O well!

joking buddy!

Derrick proved himself in the POs already. Against your PG, I might add

Durant wasn't a complete no brainer when I was on the clock, but he was close. Our two teams have two guys each that are very arguably better or worse than one another for this season.

Post #144 » by **VintaGe36** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:47 pm

What's everyone's aim screenames?

SamBone · Post #145 » by **SamBone** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:48 pm

so snakes and anyone else on AIM.

I just signed up so hit me up so I have your info

theSamBone is my account

deNIEd · Post #146 » by **deNIEd** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:49 pm

Why does it matter..i thought trades aren't allowed

Teddy KGB · Post #147 » by **Teddy KGB** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:49 pm

I have AIM but never use it, so if you want to contact me e-mail me at renegadeshark@gmail.com

Post #148 » by **CellarDoor** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:50 pm

SamBone wrote:so snakes and anyone else on AIM.

I just signed up so hit me up so I have your info

theSamBone is my account

My SN is accessible in about 5 different places on this board. Check the GM a team Rosters for it. Going out of town Saturday and Sunday this weekend, and probably doing something tonight, so I might not be on for a bit.

Post #149 » by **VintaGe36** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:51 pm

deNIEd wrote:Why does it matter..i thought trades aren't allowed

We can't have discussions?

Post #150 » by **CellarDoor** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:51 pm

deNIEd wrote:Why does it matter..i thought trades aren't allowed

Not everyone doesn't like to just have conversations...

SamBone · Post #151 » by **SamBone** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:54 pm

deNIEd wrote:Why does it matter..i thought trades aren't allowed

maybe some people like to talk

Post #152 » by **CellarDoor** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:55 pm

haha, 3 GMs down, another 15 and everyone will have chastised denied.

Post #153 » by **VintaGe36** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:56 pm

....11?

deNIEd · Post #154 » by **deNIEd** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:58 pm

CellarDoor wrote:haha, 3 GMs down, another 15 and everyone will have chastised denied.

Well, i have 1,000 friends on myspace so no room for new people.

Just wanted to make sure we couldn't trade lol

Teddy KGB · Post #155 » by **Teddy KGB** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:58 pm

...12?

Post #156 » by **CellarDoor** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:58 pm

VintaGe36 wrote:....11?

You had a golden opportunity to correct me and flubbed it. The correct answer is 12.

3+12=15 16-Denied=15

Post #157 » by **Snakebites** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:59 pm

VintaGe36 wrote:What's everyone's aim screenames?

BigJoeSzak

Post #158 » by **CellarDoor** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:00 pm

deNIEd wrote:
CellarDoor wrote:haha, 3 GMs down, another 15 and everyone will have chastised denied.

Well, i have 1,000 friends on myspace so no room for new people.

Just wanted to make sure we couldn't trade lol

Thanks for clarifying.

And the correct response if you just wanted to make sure we couldn't trade would've been "trades aren't allowed, right?"

Not something that others read as "what's the point of talking to any of you if i'm not going to make a trade"

Post #159 » by **VintaGe36** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:04 pm

My fault, I was under the impression we didn't my lackey Teddy KGB a "person".

Post #160 » by **CellarDoor** » Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:05 pm

VintaGe36 wrote:My fault, I was under the impression we didn't my lackey Teddy KGB a "person".

Which would be a great recovery if I hadn't said "GMs" rather than "people" or "person"

Of course, I guess you don't really count as a "GM", so maybe you were right after all.