Culpepper sucks. I give up sticking up for the guy. Ya'll were right, I was wrong.
I'm moving to Massachusetts.
I'm not in denial anymore.
Moderator: theBigLip
I'm not in denial anymore.
- Bartender
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,544
- And1: 3
- Joined: Feb 17, 2009
I'm not in denial anymore.
TSE wrote:Wow I actually like this trade, good job Mayhew!
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,912
- And1: 2,245
- Joined: Oct 03, 2005
-
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.

Stafford isn't the player Culpepper was, he doesn't have the knowledge/experience Daunte does, but he's a better fit for the team and that's why he was named the starter. Daunte could be a very good back-up QB if he accepted the role and worked situationally. But when he's depended on and can't produce, he hurts the team.
I would actually rather see Stanton play behind Stafford than Culpepper. Stanton might be a better run QB than a passing QB, but he's also better suited to this transition team. If we could move Culpepper for anything (once Matt is healthy) I would do it instantly.
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 12,160
- And1: 85
- Joined: Jul 04, 2006
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
He was pretty bad today. That pick to Cullen Jenkins was absurd. Hes not a terrible backup...but im also on board the Stanton train right now. Drew should be the #2 QB when Stafford is healthy.
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,406
- And1: 161
- Joined: Dec 05, 2008
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
It's nice to see you 3 finally agree with me and TSE in playing stanton over CP.I thought this day would never come.
Defence Wins Championships,we need to return to the Bad Boy era.
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
- Bartender
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,544
- And1: 3
- Joined: Feb 17, 2009
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
^shut up.. you were still wrong about Mark Sanchez.
And yeah, it was eye gouging to see him play today. It's like he didn't even care. Although he doesn't have a good history playing in Lambeau, he was just God awful yesterday. Makes me extremely happy we drafted Stafford. Even watching Sanchez lately, I'm happy we drafted Stafford. I can tell now that he is the real deal.
And yeah, it was eye gouging to see him play today. It's like he didn't even care. Although he doesn't have a good history playing in Lambeau, he was just God awful yesterday. Makes me extremely happy we drafted Stafford. Even watching Sanchez lately, I'm happy we drafted Stafford. I can tell now that he is the real deal.
TSE wrote:Wow I actually like this trade, good job Mayhew!
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,514
- And1: 1,963
- Joined: Mar 02, 2001
- Contact:
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
Sign me up for "drew should be no. 2". I didn't think Culpepper would look amazing, but I expected more like this. As bad as the Lions have been, I've never thought "Will you throw the damn ball already" so much until yesterday. Then he scrambles out and suddenly pulls up, and I'm like you really couldn't care less could you? Then I realized it was a hamstring issue or whatever, but still.
So lets finally see what Drew can do, unless Stafford is ready. Its sad too because Green Bay kept handing Detroit oppurtunities.
So lets finally see what Drew can do, unless Stafford is ready. Its sad too because Green Bay kept handing Detroit oppurtunities.
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,912
- And1: 2,245
- Joined: Oct 03, 2005
-
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
Actually, I'm pretty sure I was higher on Stanton than Culpepper all along, unlike one Mrs. TSE who was raging on and on about Culpepper being our real QB since we didn't draft Sanchez.
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,405
- And1: 9
- Joined: Jul 20, 2009
- Location: Detroit
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
kellmellus50 wrote:It's nice to see you 3 finally agree with me and TSE in playing stanton over CP.I thought this day would ever come.
The name of the game in GMing in the NFL to turn a team from worst to first is to be able to have strategic foresight in being able to choose which battles you want to fight, and taking on all of these journeymen (older and proven to be unspectacular) players like Cpep and the others is just not the right path to gamble on. It's high odds to achieve mediocrity at best, and even if you win that gamble, you still lose. You have to maneuver around the paths that give you the greatest chances of bursting through the bubble where it is less crowded with average teams that practice illogical team building strategies.
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,405
- And1: 9
- Joined: Jul 20, 2009
- Location: Detroit
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
Liqourish wrote:Actually, I'm pretty sure I was higher on Stanton than Culpepper all along, unlike one Mrs. TSE who was raging on and on about Culpepper being our real QB since we didn't draft Sanchez.
I was raging on about what now? I think you are misaligned with what my position was on Culpepper and the conditions that I set for considering Sanchez as a draft prospect.
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,912
- And1: 2,245
- Joined: Oct 03, 2005
-
Re: I'm not in denial anymore.
Nope, not you, you're female counterpart.
I don't know why I chose to display this post.
I don't know why I chose to display this post.