ImageImageImage

hawks waive juan dixon

Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman

kgnwally
Sophomore
Posts: 154
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 18, 2009

hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#1 » by kgnwally » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:32 pm

what do you guys think? he can be a nice backup for rondo while hudson comes along during the season. he can be had for the minimum so its a low risk/ medium reward situation :D
User avatar
Lewis35
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,417
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 11, 2003

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#2 » by Lewis35 » Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:16 pm

Celtics have no roster spots.
Reggie stood out like a sore thumb no tattoos no agenda no chirping nothing Just a guy who could score at will He played college ball at Northeastern he replaced Larry as Celtics captain he belonged to Boston.
And I still miss him. Even now.

Bill Simmons
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,302
And1: 69,910
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#3 » by Celts17Pride » Tue Oct 20, 2009 5:19 pm

I would rather have Antonio Daniels who is probably going to be released any day now by the TWolves.
hairybyrd
Junior
Posts: 367
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 27, 2009

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#4 » by hairybyrd » Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:07 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:I would rather have Antonio Daniels who is probably going to be released any day now by the TWolves.


+1. While Dixon is a decent player he doesn't do anything very well but score the basketball. The Celts have several shooters and scorers so Dixon's skills are a little redundant on this team. Adding Antonio Daniels is different. He's a natural back-up PG, better court vision, better ball handling and passing, and better defense. I'm not sure if he'll be released but Kahn did say he would trade Daniels for salary gain. A package of TA, Scal and $ gets it done. Is that enough? Even if he was cut, we would have to release at least 2 players to sign him so it's basically the same thing either way.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,302
And1: 69,910
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#5 » by Celts17Pride » Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:39 pm

hairybyrd wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:I would rather have Antonio Daniels who is probably going to be released any day now by the TWolves.


+1. While Dixon is a decent player he doesn't do anything very well but score the basketball. The Celts have several shooters and scorers so Dixon's skills are a little redundant on this team. Adding Antonio Daniels is different. He's a natural back-up PG, better court vision, better ball handling and passing, and better defense. I'm not sure if he'll be released but Kahn did say he would trade Daniels for salary gain. A package of TA, Scal and $ gets it done. Is that enough? Even if he was cut, we would have to release at least 2 players to sign him so it's basically the same thing either way.


The Wolves may trade him between now and the beginning of the season but I don't think he is going to make the opening day roster for the Wolves. He doesn't fit into their plans and he would take up a roster spot, same thing for Mark Blount. We'll see.

I see a buyout coming for both Antonio Daniels and Mark Blount.
FeedReed
Starter
Posts: 2,307
And1: 839
Joined: Jan 17, 2006

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#6 » by FeedReed » Tue Oct 20, 2009 6:40 pm

antonio daniels is garbage, blount i'd take back.
Darth Celtic
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 38,946
And1: 17,506
Joined: Jun 26, 2003
Location: Big 3 will crush the east!
     

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#7 » by Darth Celtic » Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:14 pm

FeedReed wrote:antonio daniels is garbage, blount i'd take back.


:jawdrop: :jawdrop: :jawdrop: :jawdrop:
MrDollarBills = MrWelchesBets
aboubata
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,868
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 23, 2004

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#8 » by aboubata » Tue Oct 20, 2009 7:17 pm

FeedReed wrote:antonio daniels is garbage, blount i'd take back.

:( :x :cry: :evil: :roll: :nonono: :banghead: :wavefinger: :crazy: :curse: :cry: :eek1: :eek2: :brokenheart: :dontknow: :sigh: :sad:
NFL fans are now feeling what NBA fans been living for a while...
User avatar
SonicYouth34
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,575
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 25, 2008
Contact:

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#9 » by SonicYouth34 » Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:15 pm

FeedReed wrote:antonio daniels is garbage, blount i'd take back.


This kid needs to be banned.
Celtics! Horah!
Celtics! Horah!
Celtics! Horah!
1,2,3 Ubuntu.
BillessuR6
General Manager
Posts: 8,786
And1: 2,614
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
 

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#10 » by BillessuR6 » Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:43 pm

FeedReed wrote:antonio daniels is garbage, blount i'd take back.



BAN!!!
User avatar
JSABleedsGreen
Junior
Posts: 415
And1: 6
Joined: Aug 03, 2009

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#11 » by JSABleedsGreen » Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:53 pm

FeedReed wrote:antonio daniels is garbage, blount i'd take back.


BAN! I second that.
User avatar
bendyone
Analyst
Posts: 3,044
And1: 100
Joined: Oct 10, 2009

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#12 » by bendyone » Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:09 pm

FeedReed wrote:antonio daniels is garbage, blount i'd take back.


Checked the calander...It aint april fools!!! WTF??
BANG!................. Marjong!
User avatar
Bad-Thoma
Head Coach
Posts: 7,198
And1: 10,069
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Location: Still riding proud on the C's bandwagon

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#13 » by Bad-Thoma » Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:45 pm

FeedReed wrote:antonio daniels is garbage, blount i'd take back.



Banhammered! Jk, but wow... just wow. wow
User avatar
chakdaddy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,378
And1: 1,420
Joined: Nov 24, 2006

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#14 » by chakdaddy » Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:06 pm

I don't think Hudson has clearly locked down a spot; we have an open spot.

I'd take Dixon. A combo guard who can knock down a jumper and who is a winner. I don't know Daniels so well that I'm sure I'd take one over the other; but I think we should try to cash Scal/TA into more than someone like that.
GregB
RealGM
Posts: 11,923
And1: 2,999
Joined: Sep 21, 2004
Location: South Shore, MA
     

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#15 » by GregB » Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:59 pm

chakdaddy wrote:I don't think Hudson has clearly locked down a spot; we have an open spot.


I agree. He is just holding the candle until a better pg option is available. But, I don't think that is Dixon. I agree that Daniels make a lot more sense if he gets waived.
User avatar
King Of The 4th
General Manager
Posts: 7,750
And1: 8,136
Joined: Apr 26, 2009
Location: Florida
     

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#16 » by King Of The 4th » Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:17 pm

FeedReed wrote:antonio daniels is garbage, blount i'd take back.


:crazy:
MetalFingaz wrote:Clearly he was trying to go off the backboard to the ghost of Rik Smits, but he forget Rik was still alive and that ghosts can't dunk.


KDBG wrote:I want to kill Jamal Crawford. Murder his 80 year old a$$. But he is probably a cool guy in real life.
User avatar
Dogen
RealGM
Posts: 15,512
And1: 12,265
Joined: Apr 23, 2004
Location: Shulgastan
 

Re: hawks waive juan dixon 

Post#17 » by Dogen » Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:36 pm

FeedReed wrote:antonio daniels is garbage, blount i'd take back.


What the heck:

:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
:curse: :curse: :curse: :curse: :curse: :curse: :curse: :curse:
:waaa: :waaa: :waaa: :waaa: :waaa: :waaa: :waaa: :eek1: :eek1: :eek1: :eek2: :eek2: :eek2:
:dontknow: :dontknow: :dontknow: :dontknow: :dontknow: :dontknow: :dontknow: :dontknow:
:jawdrop: :jawdrop: :jawdrop: :jawdrop: :jawdrop: :jawdrop: :jawdrop: :jawdrop: :jawdrop: :jawdrop: :jawdrop: :jawdrop:
:upset: :upset: :upset: :upset: :upset: :uhoh: :uhoh: :uhoh: :upset: :upset:
:spam:
:curse:

Return to Boston Celtics