ImageImageImageImageImage

Kings interested in Jake Voskuhl

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,687
And1: 1,363
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: Kings interested in Jake Voskuhl 

Post#61 » by OGSactownballer » Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:26 pm

I see a LOT of people worried about Spencer and Jason's minutes. I have to say that I can't see having a solid b/u big affecting that at all. They cannot (nor will they be able to because of fouls alone) play 48 mpg each. I wouldn't WANT that because of the injury risk. As it stands, we don't have a big enough guy behind them to eat the minutes while they rest and beat on the other team's bigs for a while.
User avatar
pillwenney
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 48,887
And1: 2,603
Joined: Sep 19, 2004
Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
Contact:
 

Re: Kings interested in Jake Voskuhl 

Post#62 » by pillwenney » Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:29 pm

SacKingZZZ wrote:
It's also just a lot easier to play small (since they do it anyway of course) and save the money in the event something like that happens.

Same thing was said about Ike Diogu and Calvin Booth last year that left everyone with the same question, "why did it take so long for Ike to play?" The only possible thing stopping it from happening this time is the fact that we have a different coach.


That's fine until we're in a situation where we'll get abused if we go small--and there are plenty of those. I'm sure we'll see examples pretty quickly going into the season.
User avatar
_SRV_
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Location: brew for breakfast

Re: Kings interested in Jake Voskuhl 

Post#63 » by _SRV_ » Tue Oct 27, 2009 11:30 pm

deNIEd wrote:
_SRV_ wrote:it's matchup related, when playing physical guys and Hawes get to foul trouble/get burned (and until now this has been the case), the big guy will get more minutes, against smaller teams he'll see little time. And Hawes can get the experience w/o being the only man on the field for the job.


Do you think that a guy like Voskuhl is gonna do anything against the Dwights, Duncans, Shaqs, Lopez's, etc?

Voskuhl no, better guy will do a better job than Hawes, and I'm talking less about Howard, more about Lopez, Bynum and Hibbert.
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Kobe gets bailed out more than Wall Street.
deNIEd
Banned User
Posts: 4,942
And1: 30
Joined: Jul 18, 2006

Re: Kings interested in Jake Voskuhl 

Post#64 » by deNIEd » Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:32 am

_SRV_ wrote:
deNIEd wrote:
_SRV_ wrote:it's matchup related, when playing physical guys and Hawes get to foul trouble/get burned (and until now this has been the case), the big guy will get more minutes, against smaller teams he'll see little time. And Hawes can get the experience w/o being the only man on the field for the job.


Do you think that a guy like Voskuhl is gonna do anything against the Dwights, Duncans, Shaqs, Lopez's, etc?

Voskuhl no, better guy will do a better job than Hawes, and I'm talking less about Howard, more about Lopez, Bynum and Hibbert.


Oh I see, my point was, if our opposing bigs forced our bigs into foul trouble and into bad games, I really don't see a guy like Voskuhl making any difference whatsoever regarding if we win or lose.
User avatar
_SRV_
Analyst
Posts: 3,030
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Location: brew for breakfast

Re: Kings interested in Jake Voskuhl 

Post#65 » by _SRV_ » Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:14 am

deNIEd wrote:Oh I see, my point was, if our opposing bigs forced our bigs into foul trouble and into bad games, I really don't see a guy like Voskuhl making any difference whatsoever regarding if we win or lose.


Yeah, what I'm saying is
1. We really need a big man.
2. we need a big man better than Voskuhl, who is kinda redundant.
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:Kobe gets bailed out more than Wall Street.
deNIEd
Banned User
Posts: 4,942
And1: 30
Joined: Jul 18, 2006

Re: Kings interested in Jake Voskuhl 

Post#66 » by deNIEd » Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:44 am

_SRV_ wrote:2. we need a big man better than Voskuhl, who is kinda redundant.


Conclusion,

Neither of us want Voskuhl
SadKingsFan
RealGM
Posts: 10,340
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Location: Sacramento CA
 

Re: Kings interested in Jake Voskuhl 

Post#67 » by SadKingsFan » Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:44 am

I agree, this would be a pretty pointless signing.

Return to Sacramento Kings