Aren't the Ts more than a little overdone?

Fencer reregistered · Post #1 » by **Fencer reregistered** » Fri Nov 6, 2009 4:48 am

How many Ts does Sheed have so far? .5/game or so?

And wasn't Perk supposed to be over getting Ted up?

Doc needs to clamp down on that fast.

Roscoe Sheed · Post #2 » by **Roscoe Sheed** » Fri Nov 6, 2009 5:08 am

I thought it was hilarious in the Philly game when Sheed put the ball on the floor and refused to pick it up. If not for Pierce running into retrieve the ball, he probably would have been booted.

SonicYouth34 · Post #3 » by **SonicYouth34** » Fri Nov 6, 2009 5:09 am

Why if its not costing us games? We have like a +19 point differential in our first 6 games.

If they try not to get techs they'll be playing without emotion, which takes away part of their game, which is not good. Perk practically led the league last year and we still won 62 games, so its not a big deal.

GuyClinch · Post #4 » by **GuyClinch** » Fri Nov 6, 2009 6:17 am

Well remember what Donaghy said about T's - they look to hit Wallace with em no doubt. All he has to do is look at em funny.

GregB · Post #5 » by **GregB** » Fri Nov 6, 2009 6:20 am

SonicYouth34 wrote:Why if its not costing us games? We have like a +19 point differential in our first 6 games.

If they try not to get techs they'll be playing without emotion, which takes away part of their game, which is not good. Perk practically led the league last year and we still won 62 games, so its not a big deal.

True, But Perk also stopped getting Ts at the end of the year. Because one you hit a certain number, I think 15, You continue to get suspended when you go over and above that number. It doesn't reset.

Fencer reregistered · Post #6 » by **Fencer reregistered** » Fri Nov 6, 2009 6:27 am

SonicYouth34 wrote:Why if its not costing us games? We have like a +19 point differential in our first 6 games.

Suspensions, eventually.

Dave_From_NB · Post #7 » by **Dave_From_NB** » Fri Nov 6, 2009 1:43 pm

The Refs just throw out a bunch of T's the start of the year to try and settle everyone down, and once players get them stacked up they stop calling them. Other than the 1 point, it's nothing worth getting worried about.

Post #8 » by **darrendaye** » Fri Nov 6, 2009 2:30 pm

I respect that Doc has earned his reputation as a coach players like to play for due to his diplomacy, however, I agree that to see him just gaze at what goes on when Sheed, KG, Perk, etc., go overboard, does get my goat. But to be fair, perhaps Rivers does get in their face in the lockeroom.

Post #9 » by **sully00** » Fri Nov 6, 2009 2:40 pm

Did people really think that Sheed was going to come to Boston and turn into Tim Duncan (not the the refs seem to like him much either) plant his ass on the low blocks and nothing to nobody? Sheed is 34 not 24 there is no damn changing. Doc is not going change anything that Jim Lynam, PJ Carlesimo, Mike Dunleavy, Mo Cheeks, Larry Brown, Flip Saunders, and Michael Curry couldn't change. He is grown ass man and he is who he is, you can hate 'em for the 3's and T's but seriously this is like dating the blond with big boobs who has a drinking problem and getting mad when she gets drunk. If you think Wallace is going to change that is on you.

Bad-Thoma · Post #10 » by **Bad-Thoma** » Fri Nov 6, 2009 10:03 pm

sully00 wrote:Did people really think that Sheed was going to come to Boston and turn into Tim Duncan (not the the refs seem to like him much either) plant his ass on the low blocks and nothing to nobody? Sheed is 34 not 24 there is no damn changing. Doc is not going change anything that Jim Lynam, PJ Carlesimo, Mike Dunleavy, Mo Cheeks, Larry Brown, Flip Saunders, and Michael Curry couldn't change. He is grown ass man and he is who he is, you can hate 'em for the 3's and T's but seriously this is like dating the blond with big boobs who has a drinking problem and getting mad when she gets drunk. If you think Wallace is going to change that is on you.

All sarcasm aside, who is this blonde and is she available?

hourockman · Post #11 » by **hourockman** » Sat Nov 7, 2009 10:23 pm

Roscoe Sheed wrote:I thought it was hilarious in the Philly game when Sheed put the ball on the floor and refused to pick it up. If not for Pierce running into retrieve the ball, he probably would have been booted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3zxY3iu6n8

@ 6:24

Roscoe Sheed · Post #12 » by **Roscoe Sheed** » Sat Nov 7, 2009 11:08 pm

hourockman wrote:
Roscoe Sheed wrote:I thought it was hilarious in the Philly game when Sheed put the ball on the floor and refused to pick it up. If not for Pierce running into retrieve the ball, he probably would have been booted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3zxY3iu6n8

@ 6:24

I get Garretson's point, but get real. That was the WCF for godsakes! You can't kick a guy out for staring