return2glory wrote:BRUNiNHO91 wrote:return2glory wrote:I voted for Scal also. Ray and Pierce didn't do enough to deserve it. Ray did get hot and carried us in the 4th after Scalabrine set the tone in the 3rd. Rondo was bench in the 4th because of that one play where he took his time bringing the ball up the court, failed to set the offense, and took a 26 foot 3 as the clock was expiring. That was one of the worst plays/lack of effort I've seen in a while.
Scalarine hit two key shots and his defense was great. Scalabrine was a spark off the bench that when needed.
So 16 pts isn't enough, but 5 is? 3 huge shots in the 4th isn't enough, but 2 shots in the 3rd is?
You mean defense, as in fouling peope all the time? And picking up a CLEAR PATH foul, that could have screwed us? And 'set the tone'..come on guys...he hit a 3 pt shot..ONE 3 pt shot..how is that setting the tone?
Celtics fan base really needs to stop liking Scal just because he is fat and red headed..if I had not watched the game, I would think he put up 32 and 12 reading some of the posts here..gee..put Shelden Williams in his position, and this cigar EASILY goes to Rondo or Ray..
Bottom line is you expect Pierce and Ray to play well. They are stars and they didn't step up. 16 from Pierce isn'y enough, and neither is 12 from Ray. Everyone on this team underachieved in this game, except for Scalabrine and Shelden Williams. His two baskets came at a time when we needed them. And he played great defense. And that clear path foul was some B.S. Scal was ahead of that play.
So basically what your saying is, Scal sucks really bad, but he sucked less than usual, got a whopping 5 points, so he should get it?Ok..I get you.
IMO, there was still 2 players in this game that should have ruined Scal's career game..and they were Allen and Rondo. Allen made the 3 biggest shots of the night, and Rondo was solid for 3 quarters.