ImageImage

Packers vs. 49ers

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 35,391
And1: 8,012
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

Re: Packers vs. 49ers 

Post#341 » by Mags FTW » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:20 pm

Balls2TheWalls wrote:I don't know, this has to be the least happy I have been about a win in a long time.

It's like the opposite of the Brandon Jennings situation.

If the Bucks lose, you think "well, at least we still have Brad".

If the Pack wins, you think "yeah, but we still have McCarthy".
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,787
And1: 27,357
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Packers vs. 49ers 

Post#342 » by trwi7 » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:20 pm

emunney wrote:McCarthy really needs to write a book about how to make a dominate performance end as a very close game.


Fixed. Lern sum grammer.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,902
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: Packers vs. 49ers 

Post#343 » by Bernman » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:22 pm

Simulack wrote:Somebody brought it up right away.


Not to make this a more long, drawn out discussion than it deserves to be, but where?

viewtopic.php?f=161&t=960873&start=240
User avatar
Ryan5UW
General Manager
Posts: 8,454
And1: 1,532
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Location: Madison, WI
     

Re: Packers vs. 49ers 

Post#344 » by Ryan5UW » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:23 pm

Bernman wrote:
Simulack wrote:Somebody brought it up right away.


Not to make this a more long, drawn out discussion than it deserves to be, but where?

viewtopic.php?f=161&t=960873&start=240


Dude, let it go. One post on it was drawing it out more than it deserves to be.
User avatar
Ryan5UW
General Manager
Posts: 8,454
And1: 1,532
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Location: Madison, WI
     

Re: Packers vs. 49ers 

Post#345 » by Ryan5UW » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:24 pm

Wow, Cleveland called for pass interference down by (or in, I can't tell) the endzone. Det gets TD at the end, extra point to win.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,902
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: Packers vs. 49ers 

Post#346 » by Bernman » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:26 pm

Ryan5UW wrote:
Bernman wrote:
Simulack wrote:Somebody brought it up right away.


Not to make this a more long, drawn out discussion than it deserves to be, but where?

viewtopic.php?f=161&t=960873&start=240


Dude, let it go. One post on it was drawing it out more than it deserves to be.


Then don't respond.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,902
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: Packers vs. 49ers 

Post#347 » by Bernman » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:43 pm

The important point is today provided strong evidence that McCarthy's bad reasoning and judgment within the game will eventually lead to a key loss ala Sherm in the 04 playoffs against Philly. Today we were fortunate to play a team we were far superior to.
Balls2TheWalls
RealGM
Posts: 20,343
And1: 4,113
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
         

Re: Packers vs. 49ers 

Post#348 » by Balls2TheWalls » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:58 pm

Bernman wrote:The important point is today provided strong evidence that McCarthy's bad reasoning and judgment within the game will eventually lead to a key loss ala Sherm in the 04 playoffs against Philly. Today we were fortunate to play a team we were far superior to.


It makes me sad when I think about what Holmgren could do with this roster.
SupremeHustle wrote:Salmons might shoot us out of games, but SJAX shoots people out of parking lots. Think about it.
El Duderino
RealGM
Posts: 20,545
And1: 1,328
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Working on pad level

Re: Packers vs. 49ers 

Post#349 » by El Duderino » Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:06 am

Balls2TheWalls wrote:
Simulack wrote:
Bernman wrote:Why didn't anyone here question McCarthy not going for two when we went up 30-10 with around 10-12 minutes to play? It seemed obvious to me beforehand that it would be the plan.


Somebody brought it up right away. Along with the moronic challenge and conservative play-calling with a **** half left in the game, MM has destroyed all the enthusiasm I had after the first half. He is not a good coach.


Conservative? We have passed the ball 45 times to 28 carries. The carries have actually gone up as the game has been more contested. The play calling has been down right terrible. We have been running empty backfield first downs. What team is going to respect the run with no running back in the backfield? McCarthy has to be the stupidest "West Coast Guru" on earth.


I don't get the conservative talk either. We were running the ball well, yet MM kept passing often, even on downs like 2nd/3rd and short.
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 59,152
And1: 15,031
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

Re: Packers vs. 49ers 

Post#350 » by Ayt » Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:17 am

trwi7 wrote:
emunney wrote:McCarthy really needs to write a book about how to make a dominate performance end as a very close game.


Fixed. Lern sum grammer.


Never gets old.

Return to Green Bay Packers