ImageImageImageImageImage

RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN....

Moderators: KF10, codydaze

Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#1 » by Smills91 » Sat Nov 21, 2009 6:17 pm

With the recent discussions of the Kenny Thomas' expiring trading chip between the Hornets(for Okafor) and the Sixers(for Dalembert) I was thinking one of the main reasons why these deals didn't work was, in Okafor's case he had too big a contract for too long for a rebuilding team like the Kings and in Dalembert's case, he's just not worth an expiring contract in and of himself.

That got me thinkng, the Clippers are a notoriously cheap franchise and are still having trouble winning with their current pieces. They have a lot of contracts set to expire in 2010, but have two big nooses around their financial necks at the moment in Baron Davis and Chris Kaman. If they were able to trade one or both of them for some expiring contracts, they're in a big enough market and would have enough cash, along with some nice young, CHEAP prospects to lure a big free agent or two. (If you're LeBron, wade, Bosh, Amare or Boozer, where would you rather go for the same money? New York city with Danilo Gallinari, Wilson Chandler and Jordan Hill where it's quite frosty during the season, or LAC with Blake Griffin, Eric Gordon and DeAndre Jordan all in place where it's about 60-70 degrees during the season? Oh and you get an instant inner-city rivalry with a team in contention.

So without further adieu, I propose:

Kings deal:
Kenny Thomas

Clippers deal:
Chris Kaman

This save the Clippers money instantly and into the next 2 seasons.
This gives the Kings an anchor offensively and defensively at the 5 spot to rotate in with Hawes and Thompson for a VERY solid 3 man rotation amongst their bigs.

This deal leaves the clippers with a total committed salary for the 2010-2011 season of less than 28 million. Giving them roughly enough money to go after 2 major free agents next season. And IMO the most desirable Free Agent destination with the most amount of money to offer. LAC > NYK or NJN IMO.

If the Clips can find a taker for Baron Davis(not likely) then they'd have even more money to play with next year in FA. Even then as is, 25-30 million in FA money is quite significant.
User avatar
Crimson King
Pro Prospect
Posts: 962
And1: 34
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#2 » by Crimson King » Sat Nov 21, 2009 6:37 pm

The Clippers' big that will be on the block when Griffin returns is Camby, and he would be nice for the Kings. Think something to bring him here.

But they'll want more than a expiring for Kaman IMO.
User avatar
PerkinsFor3
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,989
And1: 2,065
Joined: Nov 10, 2004
Contact:

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#3 » by PerkinsFor3 » Sat Nov 21, 2009 6:47 pm

Incoming Players
Kenny Thomas
6-7 PF from New Mexico
1.6 ppg, 5.6 rpg, 0.3 apg in 14.3 minutes
Donte Greene
6-11 SF from Syracuse
7.4 ppg, 1.6 rpg, 0.4 apg in 13.1 minutes

Outgoing Players
Ricky Davis
6-7 SG from Iowa
5.4 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 1.6 apg in 13.9 minutes
Marcus Camby
6-11 C from Massachusetts
7.5 ppg, 8.6 rpg, 3.2 apg in 30.1 minutes


:)
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#4 » by Smills91 » Sat Nov 21, 2009 6:53 pm

zar wrote:The Clippers' big that will be on the block when Griffin returns is Camby, and he would be nice for the Kings. Think something to bring him here.

But they'll want more than a expiring for Kaman IMO.


Why? Camby expires, Kaman has 3 years left. They're not winning anything this year, honestly. they're worse than our Kings. Move the salary, clear the books and go after the Wade's, LeBron's, Bosh's, Boozer, Amare's etc and try to rebuild that way.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#5 » by Smills91 » Sat Nov 21, 2009 6:53 pm

loot wrote:Incoming Players
Kenny Thomas
6-7 PF from New Mexico
1.6 ppg, 5.6 rpg, 0.3 apg in 14.3 minutes
Donte Greene
6-11 SF from Syracuse
7.4 ppg, 1.6 rpg, 0.4 apg in 13.1 minutes

Outgoing Players
Ricky Davis
6-7 SG from Iowa
5.4 ppg, 1.9 rpg, 1.6 apg in 13.9 minutes
Marcus Camby
6-11 C from Massachusetts
7.5 ppg, 8.6 rpg, 3.2 apg in 30.1 minutes


:)

Yuck for the Kings
User avatar
Crimson King
Pro Prospect
Posts: 962
And1: 34
Joined: Apr 26, 2007

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#6 » by Crimson King » Sat Nov 21, 2009 7:09 pm

Smills91 wrote:
zar wrote:The Clippers' big that will be on the block when Griffin returns is Camby, and he would be nice for the Kings. Think something to bring him here.

But they'll want more than a expiring for Kaman IMO.


Why? Camby expires, Kaman has 3 years left. They're not winning anything this year, honestly. they're worse than our Kings. Move the salary, clear the books and go after the Wade's, LeBron's, Bosh's, Boozer, Amare's etc and try to rebuild that way.


Because they have a 20/8.5 27 years old C locked for 2 more years with a decent contract. Kaman has still a lot to give to the franchise, but Camby is gone at the end of the season.

I can't imagine any of the players you name signing with the Clippers. If they trade Kaman, they should get value.
User avatar
Nicky Nix Nook
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,672
And1: 153
Joined: Nov 13, 2008
Contact:
       

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#7 » by Nicky Nix Nook » Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:20 pm

Smills91 wrote:LAC with Blake Griffin, Eric Gordon and DeAndre Jordan


No one is gonna be getting hard for DeAndre Jordan.
SacKingZZZ
RealGM
Posts: 24,085
And1: 1,084
Joined: Feb 19, 2005
Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#8 » by SacKingZZZ » Sun Nov 22, 2009 12:04 am

It'd take a whole lot more than Kenny to nab Kaman.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#9 » by Smills91 » Sun Nov 22, 2009 4:10 am

Nicky Nix Nook wrote:
Smills91 wrote:LAC with Blake Griffin, Eric Gordon and DeAndre Jordan


No one is gonna be getting hard for DeAndre Jordan.


Better than Jordan Hill if you ask me.
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#10 » by old rem » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:09 am

zar wrote:
Smills91 wrote:
zar wrote:The Clippers' big that will be on the block when Griffin returns is Camby, and he would be nice for the Kings. Think something to bring him here.

But they'll want more than a expiring for Kaman IMO.


Why? Camby expires, Kaman has 3 years left. They're not winning anything this year, honestly. they're worse than our Kings. Move the salary, clear the books and go after the Wade's, LeBron's, Bosh's, Boozer, Amare's etc and try to rebuild that way.


Because they have a 20/8.5 27 years old C locked for 2 more years with a decent contract. Kaman has still a lot to give to the franchise, but Camby is gone at the end of the season.

I can't imagine any of the players you name signing with the Clippers. If they trade Kaman, they should get value.


This stuff should be obvious.
CENSORED... No comment.
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#11 » by cpfsf » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:40 am

zar wrote:The Clippers' big that will be on the block when Griffin returns is Camby, and he would be nice for the Kings. Think something to bring him here.

But they'll want more than a expiring for Kaman IMO.


Just to give you an idea how LAC values Kaman and Camby, the Clippers rejected Minnesota's offer of a Mike Miller - Chris Kaman swap. The Clippers countered with a Miller - Camby trade (which as you can tell by now Minnesota rejected).

http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpages/player_relatednews.aspx?sport=NBa&id=932
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#12 » by Smills91 » Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:11 am

cpfsf wrote:
zar wrote:The Clippers' big that will be on the block when Griffin returns is Camby, and he would be nice for the Kings. Think something to bring him here.

But they'll want more than a expiring for Kaman IMO.


Just to give you an idea how LAC values Kaman and Camby, the Clippers rejected Minnesota's offer of a Mike Miller - Chris Kaman swap. The Clippers countered with a Miller - Camby trade (which as you can tell by now Minnesota rejected).

http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpages/player_relatednews.aspx?sport=NBa&id=932



That just shows me how much LAC de-values Mike Miller.
erudite23
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,857
And1: 660
Joined: Jun 14, 2004

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#13 » by erudite23 » Thu Nov 26, 2009 2:09 am

How do you think King's management, as well as the Sacto community, would take to the idea of a Boozer for Martin swap? Obviously you guys love Kevin, but there is a lot of sentiment out there that he and Evans can't coexist, or at least don't fit well next to each other, and that Evans isn't really a PG but much more of a 2. Given that, along with your on-going need for a quality low post scorer/rebounder, wouldn't the idea of a Boozer for Martin swap be ideal? Boozer has been dominating again this season, after initially getting off to a slow start with his scoring touch, and is on an expiring contract, giving you guys ultimate flexibility for your cap as well.

Meanwhile, the Jazz are in desperate need of a shooting threat that can also take a little pressure off DWill in creating offense, and have Millsap rotting as a reserve behind Boozer when he could be putting up 18/10 himself as a full time guy.

Sounds like a match made in heaven, and I've been hearing the beginnings of rumblings about possible interest in moving Martin by the Kings FO.


So...just wondering.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#14 » by loserX » Thu Nov 26, 2009 10:25 pm

Smills91 wrote:
cpfsf wrote:
zar wrote:The Clippers' big that will be on the block when Griffin returns is Camby, and he would be nice for the Kings. Think something to bring him here.

But they'll want more than a expiring for Kaman IMO.


Just to give you an idea how LAC values Kaman and Camby, the Clippers rejected Minnesota's offer of a Mike Miller - Chris Kaman swap. The Clippers countered with a Miller - Camby trade (which as you can tell by now Minnesota rejected).

http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpages/player_relatednews.aspx?sport=NBa&id=932



That just shows me how much LAC de-values Mike Miller.


Whatever they think of Mike Miller, you can bet it's not less than they think of Kenny Thomas.
Smills91
Banned User
Posts: 23,364
And1: 2
Joined: Jun 05, 2005
Location: Ronald Reagan is my political hero.

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#15 » by Smills91 » Fri Nov 27, 2009 1:35 am

loserX wrote:
Smills91 wrote:
cpfsf wrote:Just to give you an idea how LAC values Kaman and Camby, the Clippers rejected Minnesota's offer of a Mike Miller - Chris Kaman swap. The Clippers countered with a Miller - Camby trade (which as you can tell by now Minnesota rejected).

http://www.rotoworld.com/Content/playerpages/player_relatednews.aspx?sport=NBa&id=932



That just shows me how much LAC de-values Mike Miller.


Whatever they think of Mike Miller, you can bet it's not less than they think of Kenny Thomas.


Why? While Miller is considerably more desirable, he wasn't an expiring when the offer was made. K9 is now an expiring, and the once out of focus picture is becoming more and more IN FOCUS for the future of the CLips. There was no Griffin, there was hope of a team that could compete. Now, it;s obvious that this band of vets isn't the right mix, that it's time to build around Gordon/Griffin. Why not consider it more earnestly with the knowledge of things that have come to fruition.
loserX
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
Posts: 45,496
And1: 26,048
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
       

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#16 » by loserX » Fri Nov 27, 2009 2:36 am

Smills91 wrote:
loserX wrote:Whatever they think of Mike Miller, you can bet it's not less than they think of Kenny Thomas.


Why? While Miller is considerably more desirable, he wasn't an expiring when the offer was made.


According to that link, he was. The offer was made June 23...if he wasn't technically expiring, he would have technically become one in only 8 days. In any case he expires the same time as Kenny Thomas, so to say "Miller wasn't expiring then but KT is expiring now" is to miss the point completely.

Smills91 wrote:K9 is now an expiring, and the once out of focus picture is becoming more and more IN FOCUS for the future of the CLips. There was no Griffin, there was hope of a team that could compete. Now, it;s obvious that this band of vets isn't the right mix, that it's time to build around Gordon/Griffin. Why not consider it more earnestly with the knowledge of things that have come to fruition.


Whatever the problem in LAC is, it isn't Kaman, and whatever the problem is it's certainly not going to be solved by dumping him for the expiring contract of a 3rd string power forward. If the Clippers do decide to move Kaman, other teams can and will offer a lot more than a badly overpaid expiring. It's just a bad proposal. Try offering some keeper value instead.
OGSactownballer
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,687
And1: 1,363
Joined: Oct 02, 2005

Re: RE: Recent trade discussions for a BIG MAN.... 

Post#17 » by OGSactownballer » Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:24 am

The problem with the Clips is chemistry plain and simple. For whatever reason you have the classic example that throwing together a whole lot of talent just doesn't automatically guarantee wins.

Return to Sacramento Kings