ImageImageImage

+/- surprises

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

User avatar
aIvin adams
Analyst
Posts: 3,042
And1: 1,977
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

+/- surprises 

Post#1 » by aIvin adams » Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:41 pm

i like the +/- stat. of course, i don't think it's the end-all be-all, but it's good for perspective.

from coro:

* Retweet: The Suns' plus-minus leaders are Frye cumulatively (plus-56 with Frye on the floor) and Leandro Barbosa per minute (plus-.195 per minute).

http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/PaulCoro/68256

considering the suns 1st quarter woes and lb's injury... i would probably bet a dollar that coro is wrong just to prove a point.
Image
Jimmy76
RealGM
Posts: 14,548
And1: 9
Joined: May 01, 2009

Re: +/- surprises 

Post#2 » by Jimmy76 » Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:32 pm

+/- stats are really favorable to 4's who can spread the floor doesnt surprise me Frye is up there
User avatar
PHXfan85
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,545
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 06, 2007

Re: +/- surprises 

Post#3 » by PHXfan85 » Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:47 pm

aIvin adams wrote:considering the suns 1st quarter woes and lb's injury... i would probably bet a dollar that coro is wrong just to prove a point.


Prove what point? Something regarding LB? This last sentence confuses me.
Image

Tenacious Spur wrote:Suns did the correct thing letting him go. How they spended their money is the money.


That's money.
User avatar
aIvin adams
Analyst
Posts: 3,042
And1: 1,977
Joined: Jun 24, 2009
   

Re: +/- surprises 

Post#4 » by aIvin adams » Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:11 pm

PHXfan85 wrote:
aIvin adams wrote:considering the suns 1st quarter woes and lb's injury... i would probably bet a dollar that coro is wrong just to prove a point.


Prove what point? Something regarding LB? This last sentence confuses me.


if i had written 'prove a point' would it have made sense? also i dont really know what point i just MAKE POINTS. i am surprised that frye leads overall +/- for a variety of reasons, including that the suns have gotten in holes early in games (when frye is always, rather than often, in the game).

and yah as ive said my impression when barbs has been on the floor was that he's playing poorly. which i guess he's not?

+/- stats are really favorable to 4's who can spread the floor


interesting if true
Image
User avatar
PHXfan85
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,545
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 06, 2007

Re: +/- surprises 

Post#5 » by PHXfan85 » Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:49 pm

You did say "prove a point", unless you literally mean using the "'s when you said that. If it was regarding LB then I would be on board with trying to prove Coro wrong, but Frye is a different story. Regardless, isn't Frye playing the 5? Even if the +/- does favor 4's that can spread the floor, Frye isn't playing the 4 (correct me if I'm wrong). STAT spreads the floor as a 4 though, so is it relative to when STAT and Frye are on the floor?

This **** +/- stat is so confusing for me. Kind of like the QB passer rating. It all makes no sense, I just know that so long as its positive, it's good.
Image

Tenacious Spur wrote:Suns did the correct thing letting him go. How they spended their money is the money.


That's money.
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: +/- surprises 

Post#6 » by rsavaj » Thu Nov 26, 2009 12:46 am

Just mentioned this in the LB thread. He's not doing as badly as some think.

Return to Phoenix Suns