I actually didn't really love the way the team played tonight. I felt like we were kind of coasting at times--which turned out to be fine win-wise, but ehh...
Mostly, I was completely shocked that Spencer wasn't getting more minutes. I don't know if I missed something Grant and Jerry said to explain that or what, but he was flat out dominating when he got the minutes. But he only got 18 minutes for some reason. This continues the trend of going small against small teams when we're in great shape going big.
Still, you can't complain too much with a relatively easy win. And Donte was awesome. Of course, we can't expect him to shoot like this every night.
New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
- pillwenney
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 48,887
- And1: 2,603
- Joined: Sep 19, 2004
- Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
- Contact:
-
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,085
- And1: 1,084
- Joined: Feb 19, 2005
- Location: "Look at me, Dave, look. Come and touch it, Dave."
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
I think it's because he wanted to give Brockman minutes.
My two thoughts from this game are:
a) Donte F'ing Greene!!!!
and
b) I had no idea Gallinari was that freaking big! He's just as big as Jason Thompson, he's the size of a full sized PF.
My two thoughts from this game are:
a) Donte F'ing Greene!!!!
and
b) I had no idea Gallinari was that freaking big! He's just as big as Jason Thompson, he's the size of a full sized PF.
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
- RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 92,813
- And1: 37,037
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
mitchweber wrote:I actually didn't really love the way the team played tonight. I felt like we were kind of coasting at times--which turned out to be fine win-wise, but ehh...
Mostly, I was completely shocked that Spencer wasn't getting more minutes. I don't know if I missed something Grant and Jerry said to explain that or what, but he was flat out dominating when he got the minutes. But he only got 18 minutes for some reason. This continues the trend of going small against small teams when we're in great shape going big.
Still, you can't complain too much with a relatively easy win. And Donte was awesome. Of course, we can't expect him to shoot like this every night.
I think match-ups were just a problem for Hawes later on in the game. I mean, the Knicks had Nate Robinson guarding Greene! They even had a three PG lineup (Duhon, Robinson, Douglas) at times, with Gallo and Harrington at PF and C. I think PW realized that it was going to be an up tempto game, especially after Robinson went off, so he kept Hawes out of the lineup.

Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
- Nicky Nix Nook
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,672
- And1: 153
- Joined: Nov 13, 2008
- Contact:
-
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
xx_skaterdude_xx wrote:mitchweber wrote:I actually didn't really love the way the team played tonight. I felt like we were kind of coasting at times--which turned out to be fine win-wise, but ehh...
Mostly, I was completely shocked that Spencer wasn't getting more minutes. I don't know if I missed something Grant and Jerry said to explain that or what, but he was flat out dominating when he got the minutes. But he only got 18 minutes for some reason. This continues the trend of going small against small teams when we're in great shape going big.
Still, you can't complain too much with a relatively easy win. And Donte was awesome. Of course, we can't expect him to shoot like this every night.
I think match-ups were just a problem for Hawes later on in the game. I mean, the Knicks had Nate Robinson guarding Greene! They even had a three PG lineup (Duhon, Robinson, Douglas) at times, with Gallo and Harrington at PF and C. I think PW realized that it was going to be an up tempto game, especially after Robinson went off, so he kept Hawes out of the lineup.
I was at the game. Hawes was limping around the huddle, limping to shake the guys hands. He was hurtin. But ya a good game by him. Hopefully he isn't hurt too bad.
Al Harrington sucks.
This team is fun to watch.
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
- RIPskaterdude
- RealGM
- Posts: 92,813
- And1: 37,037
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
-
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
I really really hope we don't lose to the Nets. I was tempted to go to the game because the tickets are so cheap, but I have this bad feeling...

Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
- Nicky Nix Nook
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,672
- And1: 153
- Joined: Nov 13, 2008
- Contact:
-
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
ya me too. I really feel bad about that game. It's such a King-ish thing to do.
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
- pillwenney
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 48,887
- And1: 2,603
- Joined: Sep 19, 2004
- Location: Avidly reading pstyousuck.blogspot.com/
- Contact:
-
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
Nicky Nix Nook wrote:
I was at the game. Hawes was limping around the huddle, limping to shake the guys hands. He was hurtin. But ya a good game by him. Hopefully he isn't hurt too bad.
Al Harrington sucks.
This team is fun to watch.
This is all I needed to hear. Good to know. All is forgiven, Mr. Westphal.
But yeah, I feel the same way as you guys about the Nets game--especially since Harris is getting healthy. I just hope we come out and play to win--not to not lose. That's a mistake teams often make in games like this.
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
- KingInExile
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 14,416
- And1: 4
- Joined: May 25, 2004
- Location: RIP Wayman Tisdale...You left us way too early.
Re: New York (3-11) at Sacramento (5-8)
We get a win and I didn't get to see it (in Portland for Thanksgiving and no opportunity to watch). Oh well, bring on the turkey.
This space needs to be filled with a new sig...but I'm too lazy to make one.