does our running game get going against the pretty bad run defense of the broncos?
offer your opinions
so...running game
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation
- brewcityboii
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,128
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 28, 2007
- Location: BRETT FAVRE >> Any other QB in NFL History!!!
- ReasonablySober
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 107,804
- And1: 42,108
- Joined: Dec 02, 2001
- Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
- Contact:
The holes were there the entire night. Grant did a good job but outside of that one long run, he wasn't making guys miss. He just put took the ball and charged through the line.
Now, a big reason the holes were there is their line is nothing but undersized pass rushers and their MLB isn't suited to play the position. Losing John Lynch early hurt as well.
But for one night the running game looked good. I hope it's a building block and a sign of things to come.
Now, a big reason the holes were there is their line is nothing but undersized pass rushers and their MLB isn't suited to play the position. Losing John Lynch early hurt as well.
But for one night the running game looked good. I hope it's a building block and a sign of things to come.
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 224
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 10, 2007
You always hear about the need to run to set up the pass. I think our continued success passing the ball will help set up the run. But I do question whether we have the ability to run the ball on "running downs" when the defense is expecting us to. But I think McCarthy is doing his best to keep defenses off balance by rarely being predictable.
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 224
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 10, 2007
SteveScheffler wrote:i thought it was kind of refreshing to see a runningback not dance around like hes afraid of contact. i think we might have stumbled upon something good.
I thought the same thing about Grant. It was nice to see him put his shoulder down and initiate contact instead of strolling out of bounds on one particular run.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,545
- And1: 1,328
- Joined: May 30, 2005
- Location: Working on pad level
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 224
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 10, 2007
I think our running being considered the worst in the league is more a reflection on our not running the ball more than we simply can't run the ball. Of course you could argue we don't run the ball because we can't...
The two games we've tried to run the ball, we've done OK. The games we haven't run the ball very many times, we passed successfully instead. I'd rather we did that than forcing the run and gaining 50 yards on 30 carries just to prove to ourselves that we're not very good on the ground.
The two games we've tried to run the ball, we've done OK. The games we haven't run the ball very many times, we passed successfully instead. I'd rather we did that than forcing the run and gaining 50 yards on 30 carries just to prove to ourselves that we're not very good on the ground.
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 103,095
- And1: 55,633
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
jligon wrote:I think our running being considered the worst in the league is more a reflection on our not running the ball more than we simply can't run the ball. Of course you could argue we don't run the ball because we can't...
The two games we've tried to run the ball, we've done OK. The games we haven't run the ball very many times, we passed successfully instead. I'd rather we did that than forcing the run and gaining 50 yards on 30 carries just to prove to ourselves that we're not very good on the ground.
I agree with your first point for sure, GB has really only attempted to run the ball in 2 games, this game and Chicago, they have had success in both....I believe 3 of GB's 4 halfbacks average 4 yards or more per carry and in this game the fullback has played more then he has all season and Hall played an excellent game.