Wolves worse than winless Nets?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Wolves worse than winless Nets?
- The J Rocka
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,570
- And1: 1,732
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
- Location: Minneapolis
-
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 50,235
- And1: 17,158
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
I can only read the first few sentences but I agree. I look at the nets roster and see some talented scorers and a few good defenders. Wolves have no offense and no defense. I definitely think the Nets are the better team right now.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,029
- And1: 20
- Joined: Sep 28, 2009
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
This was written Before, the day before the wolves won game 2.
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
Meh. We're both terrible, so it's splitting hairs.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
- deeney0
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,594
- And1: 9
- Joined: Jan 26, 2005
- Location: Cambridge, MA
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
The way I'd judge it is that the Wolves played better in their two wins and in a couple of their losses than the Nets have all season. The Wolves have also played worse in several of the losses than the Nets have all season.
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
- The J Rocka
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,570
- And1: 1,732
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
- Location: Minneapolis
-
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
Wolves2011 wrote:
This was written Before, the day before the wolves won game 2.
But he updates it, edits everything
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 1,029
- And1: 20
- Joined: Sep 28, 2009
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
Who would you rather build around
Lopez
Harris
Yi
Douglas Roberts
Lee
or
Jefferson
Love
Rubio
Flynn
Sessions
with any of those pieces being tradeable assets.....
Lopez
Harris
Yi
Douglas Roberts
Lee
or
Jefferson
Love
Rubio
Flynn
Sessions
with any of those pieces being tradeable assets.....
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
- The J Rocka
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,570
- And1: 1,732
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
- Location: Minneapolis
-
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
Wolves2011 wrote:Who would you rather build around
Lopez
Harris
Yi
Douglas Roberts
Lee
or
Jefferson
Love
Rubio
Flynn
Sessions
with any of those pieces being tradeable assets.....
If im a star FA, MN is looking more solid
and we will add Wall, Aldrich, or Turner to that mix as well
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
- RD&KG2
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,019
- And1: 2
- Joined: Mar 31, 2003
- Location: MN/IA
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
Looking at those players with my Timberwolves colored glasses I have to say I like our building blocks better. Its just that beyond those guys we have a handful of players that arguably don't belong in the NBA.
"First of all I'd like to thank myself for all the hard work I put in"--Carmello Anthony.
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,834
- And1: 1,126
- Joined: Apr 10, 2008
- Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
-
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
Can't we all just agree we're the worst two teams.

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,808
- And1: 2,433
- Joined: Mar 06, 2009
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
RD&KG2 wrote:Looking at those players with my Timberwolves colored glasses I have to say I like our building blocks better. Its just that beyond those guys we have a handful of players that arguably don't belong in the NBA.
Forget the glasses. What are you guys smoking?
You got two PFs and three PGS!! LOL!!
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
sfernald wrote:RD&KG2 wrote:Looking at those players with my Timberwolves colored glasses I have to say I like our building blocks better. Its just that beyond those guys we have a handful of players that arguably don't belong in the NBA.
Forget the glasses. What are you guys smoking?
You got two PFs and three PGS!! LOL!!
And you're the guy that thinks that trading all our cap space for Jeffries, a bench player and a 2nd rounder is the best use of our resources.
You're a joke!! LOL!!
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,808
- And1: 2,433
- Joined: Mar 06, 2009
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
Esohny wrote:sfernald wrote:RD&KG2 wrote:Looking at those players with my Timberwolves colored glasses I have to say I like our building blocks better. Its just that beyond those guys we have a handful of players that arguably don't belong in the NBA.
Forget the glasses. What are you guys smoking?
You got two PFs and three PGS!! LOL!!
You're a joke!! LOL!!
Attacking me personally just reflects your insecurity. And changing the subject doesn't change the fact you have a pretty good poker hand there - full house - point guards over power forwards... If you draw John Wall, then you have got yourself four of a kind!!
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
I attack your ridiculous ideas, of which there are many. I do like the hypocritical accusations after your opener:
I know, sadly for us, the NBA doesn't allow trades to be made between teams. Wait, they do. You're still a joke.
sfernald wrote:Forget the glasses. What are you guys smoking?
And changing the subject doesn't change the fact you have a pretty good poker hand there - full house - point guards over power forwards... If you draw John Wall, then you have got yourself four of a kind!!
I know, sadly for us, the NBA doesn't allow trades to be made between teams. Wait, they do. You're still a joke.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,808
- And1: 2,433
- Joined: Mar 06, 2009
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
Esohny wrote:I attack your ridiculous ideas, of which there are many. I do like the hypocritical accusations after your opener:sfernald wrote:Forget the glasses. What are you guys smoking?And changing the subject doesn't change the fact you have a pretty good poker hand there - full house - point guards over power forwards... If you draw John Wall, then you have got yourself four of a kind!!
I know, sadly for us, the NBA doesn't allow trades to be made between teams. Wait, they do. You're still a joke.
I'm not arguing with you. please leave me alone.
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
- big3_8_19_21
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,113
- And1: 421
- Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
It looks like we have found ourselves a troll with low self-esteem 

Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
- jade_hippo
- Starter
- Posts: 2,383
- And1: 135
- Joined: Jan 05, 2009
- Location: Take off... eh!
-
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
i think the fact the wolves may very well begin next season with only Flynn, Jefferson, Love as the only guys on the roster from this years opening day speaks volumes about where the wolves expected to be this year. at the most we'd have Flynn Sessions Brew Ellington Gomes Love Jefferson Hollins next year. still leaving 4-7 open roster spots and some HUGE holes to fill at SG/SF/C
the nets, are only going to lose a couple of guys this summer. Simmons, Hassel and Hayes being their only expirings if my brain is working right. They are pretty set in their roster and are hoping that it grows and gets better, and hope they add a piece or two to agument. I think they are hoping the starting lineup they have will be contending for a playoff spot.
the nets, are only going to lose a couple of guys this summer. Simmons, Hassel and Hayes being their only expirings if my brain is working right. They are pretty set in their roster and are hoping that it grows and gets better, and hope they add a piece or two to agument. I think they are hoping the starting lineup they have will be contending for a playoff spot.
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
- lobishome
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,695
- And1: 632
- Joined: Sep 01, 2009
- Location: Overseas
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
I think that to be better team than NETS is a stupid solace,
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,599
- And1: 24,742
- Joined: Oct 20, 2007
- Location: bird watching
- Contact:
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
Ridiculous question. Nets have zero wins, Wolves have two.
0/2 = 0
We're at least zero times better than the Nets right now.
0/2 = 0
We're at least zero times better than the Nets right now.
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 27,341
- And1: 12,198
- Joined: Dec 27, 2003
-
Re: Wolves worse than winless Nets?
Shouldn't it be 2/0? The Wolves are an undefined amount better than the Nets
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves