Esohny wrote:I'm not a big fan of Ariza, and he's the big piece that we'd be getting for Jefferson.
Wolves2011 wrote:you always want to get Top Players for secondary ones.
We are giving up a top player = Jefferson for secondary ones.
We want to go the other way. Give up a bunch of secondary expiring contracts to get a top player.
If you want to trade a guy like jefferson, package him with some of our secondary to get a superstar like chris paul, though I'd prefer to keep Jefferson and offer one of our other top talents.
We're not trading Jefferson for Ariza straight up. We're gaining Ariza, Lee, and 5.3 million dollars in cap space (we can make an offer Memphis will refuse). We gain the 3 point shooting team we have lacked (we are the worst 3 point shooting team in the NBA). plus we have a more balanced roster and gain depth (your in good shape when Sessions, Lee, Hollins, and Brewer come off the bench).
jade_hippo wrote:would we really need Gay if we already had Ariza?
Gay=offense and Ariza=defense basically. Depending on who they play just have Ariza defend James, Bryant, or Wade while Gay will have an easier time defending Parker, Artest, or Beasley.
We hold the rights to this team assuming we acquire Cole Aldrich & we have enough money to sign Rudy Gay. (I think we should be able to afford him with 16.8 million dollars in cap space).











