WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
http://basketball.realgm.com/src_wireta ... p_50_list/
This list is a little absurd.
Elton Brand? Michael Redd? Richard Jefferson? Baron Davis? Arenas?
This list is a little absurd.
Elton Brand? Michael Redd? Richard Jefferson? Baron Davis? Arenas?
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,299
- And1: 40
- Joined: Sep 19, 2005
- Location: An Igloo
-
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
I agree that list is nuts. I can't see Artest, Boozer, Battier, Horford or McGrady above Al Jefferson.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 50,235
- And1: 17,158
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
Over current Al yea. Healthy Al no.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- Foye
- Club Captain- German Soccer
- Posts: 25,056
- And1: 3,613
- Joined: Jul 29, 2008
- Location: Frankfurt
-
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
Why is TMac even on this list? He's injuried for a season now.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- RD&KG2
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,019
- And1: 2
- Joined: Mar 31, 2003
- Location: MN/IA
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
Exactly, I read the list and I figured it was just based off of this season but if Tmac is on there this list it T-WACK.... zing.
"First of all I'd like to thank myself for all the hard work I put in"--Carmello Anthony.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- RD&KG2
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,019
- And1: 2
- Joined: Mar 31, 2003
- Location: MN/IA
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
and O.J. Mayo made it...
"First of all I'd like to thank myself for all the hard work I put in"--Carmello Anthony.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,002
- And1: 6,019
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
its a bad ranking, (Villanueva? Battier? yea right...) but I don't really mind. I hate seeing any kind of accolades for poor performance

Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
I'd take Love over a few of those players as well.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- big3_8_19_21
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,113
- And1: 421
- Joined: Jan 17, 2005
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
Do they honestly believe that current day Shaq is the 16th best player in the league? Is that some kind of joke?
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- TMo519
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,274
- And1: 25
- Joined: Jun 10, 2008
- Location: Twin Cities, MN
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
Wow, that is a really poor list, seriously. And yeah, if we're ignoring injuries and all that, Big Al should undoubtedly be on that list.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 111
- And1: 0
- Joined: Nov 02, 2009
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
"50 greatest players in the NBA today"
Hmm...
Does this mean most accomplished active players, or does it mean if the season was one game and it took place tomorrow, this is who you pick?
If it is the latter, I don't think Kobe should be #1.
Hmm...
Does this mean most accomplished active players, or does it mean if the season was one game and it took place tomorrow, this is who you pick?
If it is the latter, I don't think Kobe should be #1.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
panth181 wrote:"50 greatest players in the NBA today"
Hmm...
Does this mean most accomplished active players, or does it mean if the season was one game and it took place tomorrow, this is who you pick?
If it is the latter, I don't think Kobe should be #1.
I think it means the latter -- the best players of the present day. If the former, how could Horford or Mayo make the list?
I think Kobe is still #1 regardless.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- john2jer
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,304
- And1: 452
- Joined: May 26, 2006
- Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
-
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
panth181 wrote:"50 greatest players in the NBA today"
Hmm...
Does this mean most accomplished active players, or does it mean if the season was one game and it took place tomorrow, this is who you pick?
If it is the latter, I don't think Kobe should be #1.
That's where the list gets confusing. If they're talking about right now, this season, then how does T-Mac make the list? If they're talking in recent history, or talent level, how is Al Jefferson not on the list at all. Not entirely sure of the definition of their list. No Warriors, Kings, or Bobcats? Stephen Jackson, Monta Ellis, Gerald Wallace, or Kevin Martin?
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- lobishome
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,695
- And1: 632
- Joined: Sep 01, 2009
- Location: Overseas
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
Dwight Howard #4 and Pau Gasol #17?
WTF smoke this man?
In the playoffs, Howard shot in play 39 times and 0 points

In the playoffs, Howard shot in play 39 times and 0 points

Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
lobishome wrote:Dwight Howard #4 and Pau Gasol #17?WTF smoke this man?
In the playoffs, Howard shot in play 39 times and 0 points
You're freakin crazy man

FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- lobishome
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,695
- And1: 632
- Joined: Sep 01, 2009
- Location: Overseas
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- Pau Gasol defending Dwight Howard was expected to be a huge advantage for the bigger, stronger Howard, but Gasol's defense of Howard was masterful. The Lakers provided Gasol with significant help, and their defensive scheme was hugely successful in frustrating Howard, but Gasol deserves a lot of credit for his defense on Howard. According to ESPN DB, Dwight Howard was held to 4-10 shooting when guarded one-on-one by Gasol (Gasol, meanwhile, was 9-19 when guarded one-on-one by Howard). In Game 5, Gasol was the primary defender on Howard for in 38 possessions – in those 38 possessions, Howard didn't make a single field goal, and went to the line only once, where he went 1-2, for a grand total of one points on 38 possessions with Gasol as his primary defender.


Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
lobishome wrote:Pau Gasol defending Dwight Howard was expected to be a huge advantage for the bigger, stronger Howard, but Gasol's defense of Howard was masterful. The Lakers provided Gasol with significant help, and their defensive scheme was hugely successful in frustrating Howard, but Gasol deserves a lot of credit for his defense on Howard. According to ESPN DB, Dwight Howard was held to 4-10 shooting when guarded one-on-one by Gasol (Gasol, meanwhile, was 9-19 when guarded one-on-one by Howard). In Game 5, Gasol was the primary defender on Howard for in 38 possessions – in those 38 possessions, Howard didn't make a single field goal, and went to the line only once, where he went 1-2, for a grand total of one points on 38 possessions with Gasol as his primary defender.
![]()
I was just referring to you, generally. You're freaking crazy man.

FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 50,235
- And1: 17,158
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50

When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
- Varejao17
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,236
- And1: 165
- Joined: Sep 01, 2004
- Location: Manaus-Amazonas-Brasil
-
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
Are you kiddin' me? Battier? Villanueva? Mayo? Brand? Redd? None of them are better than Big Al...

props to C.lupus
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,971
- And1: 2,385
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: WT: No Wolves in NBA's top 50
That is the worst list I've seen. Al Jefferson should at least be top 30.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves