ImageImageImageImageImage

Anthony Randolph on the Block

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

User avatar
endlessraine
Senior
Posts: 659
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 20, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#21 » by endlessraine » Thu Dec 17, 2009 1:40 pm

Preludepunk27 wrote:
endlessraine wrote:You guys should get it right. GSw would go any trade with the Nets. We wouldn't want Yi, there's a reason why he's getting moved around. The only trade that Gsw would do is a Lopez for AR swap. We need bigs and centers, no need for another guard. And for the Jackson trade, we had to do it because he is killing the team chemistry and players actually wanted him gone. If you guys really want an 8 footers, go talk to Houston about packaging Lopez, Harris,Williams and a future first for Yao.


That is honestly the funniest thing I've seen all year and it's December. A top 5 center in the East at 21 years old for a guy, though with a ton of upside, that we can only hope can become a stud. The only time you made a trade like that is when you're trading a big contract for expirings or young players. Since they're both in their rookie deal, that's hilarious to even try to comprehend.

This has nothing to do with being greedy, that's just fact.

All Nets fans admit we lucked out totally with nabbing GSW's future 1st, but if they feel they're gonna get a guy like Lopez for Randolph, they need to wake up.




Yup. This is the feelings that I believe most of the warriors fans would feel if you're talking about williams and a first for AR. It is greedy to even mention another nets scrub for a first rounder. Also, no doubt Lopez is good, but I think if he were to play under Nellie, he'll prolly be an average 5/5 sophmore. Top 5 center in the EAstern conference that is 2-25 is really something to brag about. However, no doubt, Lopez deserves to be called top 5 center.
Just to clear things out, the dude that offer sean williams for a first rounder is trying to mock about the trade between gsw and nets last offseason. Also, I know that no nets would even considered Lopez for AR swap, that is why the Nets fans should look on our side too. Throwing a feel scrub ain't going to cut. It's pretty much a dead thread. The Nets doesn't have anyone Warriors can use besides Lopez.
User avatar
endlessraine
Senior
Posts: 659
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 20, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#22 » by endlessraine » Thu Dec 17, 2009 1:41 pm


That is honestly the funniest thing I've seen all year and it's December. A top 5 center in the East at 21 years old for a guy, though with a ton of upside, that we can only hope can become a stud. The only time you made a trade like that is when you're trading a big contract for expirings or young players. Since they're both in their rookie deal, that's hilarious to even try to comprehend.

This has nothing to do with being greedy, that's just fact.

All Nets fans admit we lucked out totally with nabbing GSW's future 1st, but if they feel they're gonna get a guy like Lopez for Randolph, they need to wake up.




Yup. This is the feelings that I believe most of the warriors fans would feel if you're talking about williams and a first for AR. It is greedy to even mention another nets scrub for a first rounder. Also, no doubt Lopez is good, but I think if he were to play under Nellie, he'll prolly be an average 5/5 sophmore. Top 5 center in the EAstern conference that is 2-25 is really something to brag about. However, no doubt, Lopez deserves to be called top 5 center.
Just to clear things out, the dude that offer sean williams for a first rounder is trying to mock about the trade between gsw and nets last offseason. THAT is greedy.
Also, I know that no nets would even considered Lopez for AR swap, that is why the Nets fans should look on our side too. Throwing a feel scrub ain't going to cut. It's pretty much a dead thread. The Nets doesn't have anyone Warriors can use beside Lopez.
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#23 » by NetsForce » Thu Dec 17, 2009 1:52 pm

I ain't mock'in on anyone if Sean Williams was in another system he'd average 15-10-3.
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#24 » by jeff1624 » Thu Dec 17, 2009 1:59 pm

NetsForce wrote:I ain't mock'in on anyone if Sean Williams was in another system he'd average 15-10-3.


15 mins. 10 pts/reb/ast/stls/blks combined and 3 fouls..

..right??
Dat Leadership
Preludepunk27
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,650
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: New Hampshire

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#25 » by Preludepunk27 » Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:25 pm

Yeah Sean Williams and a 1st is not a fair deal for Randolph.

I personally don't think GSW and NJN are really the greatest of trade partners right now. They need front court help and we are guard heavy. If they don't want Yi/Dallas 1st or Yi/GSW 1st, I don't see anything working out. I'd give them Twill and a first, but I don't think that would interest them all too much.

We most likely need a 3rd team involved if our management wants Randolph.
Image
deviljets7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,536
And1: 29
Joined: Feb 16, 2005

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#26 » by deviljets7 » Thu Dec 17, 2009 7:34 pm

I can understand if GSW wouldn't be interested in the DAL 1st plus either TWill or Lee for Randolph because of their glut at guard.
enetric wrote:You have the perfect fat% to sit on your butt, eat crap and WATCH someone else do it though. Hell, at that body fat% you might be a starter.
halfHAVOC
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,864
And1: 176
Joined: Jul 19, 2006
Contact:
 

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#27 » by halfHAVOC » Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:03 pm

Yi + Twill for Randolph + Azuibuke?
Stream My New Basketball Anthem "KING": https://ampl.ink/7QwkY
User avatar
endlessraine
Senior
Posts: 659
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 20, 2009

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#28 » by endlessraine » Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:40 am

halfHAVOC wrote:Yi + Twill for Randolph + Azuibuke?



The just won't do it man. Twill is a big chuck low percentage shooter, we have a lot of those already. Yi isn't even playing right now. And he's what? 27? Nelson is really high on Azu. I think he just told the reporter yesterday than Azu might be the sidekick guy they want. It's not a fair trade at all from our perspective. You guys might said the same thing. Its' very simple logic, when you value someone, their price just tend to be a big higher. Don't say that Sean williams can be all that and this in another system. It's just like saying AR can be a 20/10 guy in another system. I can't think of anyone that WArriors would want to take to make it a fair trade.
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#29 » by old rem » Fri Dec 18, 2009 7:10 am

Preludepunk27 wrote:
endlessraine wrote:You guys should get it right. GSw would go any trade with the Nets. We wouldn't want Yi, there's a reason why he's getting moved around. The only trade that Gsw would do is a Lopez for AR swap. We need bigs and centers, no need for another guard. And for the Jackson trade, we had to do it because he is killing the team chemistry and players actually wanted him gone. If you guys really want an 8 footers, go talk to Houston about packaging Lopez, Harris,Williams and a future first for Yao.


That is honestly the funniest thing I've seen all year and it's December. A top 5 center in the East at 21 years old for a guy, though with a ton of upside, that we can only hope can become a stud. The only time you made a trade like that is when you're trading a big contract for expirings or young players. Since they're both in their rookie deal, that's hilarious to even try to comprehend.

This has nothing to do with being greedy, that's just fact.

All Nets fans admit we lucked out totally with nabbing GSW's future 1st, but if they feel they're gonna get a guy like Lopez for Randolph, they need to wake up.



I don't expect the Nets to do Lopez for AR, but GSW has a young C anyhow. NJ has nothing else to offer,however, so, it's just a circle jerk to try to offer some scrubs. The Warriors "management" wants to save face, to offset Nellies counterproductive obsessions. They DO NOT want to be unemployable. They do NOT want to empty the arena. They do NOT want to be the "World's Dumbest".
CENSORED... No comment.
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#30 » by old rem » Fri Dec 18, 2009 7:14 am

ecuhus1981 wrote:
NetsForce wrote:Maybe I'd try to sell Eduardo Najera as a Power Guardward...

Nellie loves versatility so much, he just might do a straight-up Eddy-AR trade. Just call Najera the PG/SG/SF/PF/C guorwenter!

Seriously, though, Anthony's defense is more about stat-stuffing than anything else. People think he's a lockdown guy because he has some 2-block, 3-steal games, but opposing players are still going for career-highs on those nights against Randolph. Similar to Camby, AR either makes a spectacular play on D (if he makes the right read), or get juked completely out of position and it's an easy 2 or 3 points for the other team. He's NOT what we need.


You should have seen him vs Dwight Howard a couple weeks ago. Any 20 yr old who wins that matchup is a keeper. any coach who fails to use that...not a keeper.
CENSORED... No comment.
Jersey Generals
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,446
And1: 414
Joined: May 19, 2008

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#31 » by Jersey Generals » Fri Dec 18, 2009 8:04 pm

endlessraine wrote:Yup. This is the feelings that I believe most of the warriors fans would feel if you're talking about williams and a first for AR. It is greedy to even mention another nets scrub for a first rounder. Also, no doubt Lopez is good, but I think if he were to play under Nellie, he'll prolly be an average 5/5 sophmore. Top 5 center in the EAstern conference that is 2-25 is really something to brag about. However, no doubt, Lopez deserves to be called top 5 center.
Just to clear things out, the dude that offer sean williams for a first rounder is trying to mock about the trade between gsw and nets last offseason. Also, I know that no nets would even considered Lopez for AR swap, that is why the Nets fans should look on our side too. Throwing a feel scrub ain't going to cut. It's pretty much a dead thread. The Nets doesn't have anyone Warriors can use besides Lopez.



The difference between us making a trade suggestion and you doing it is that, well, this is a Nets thread in the Nets forum...fans are always going to try and lowball to get the player. It's not like Netsforce went into the Warriors thread and offered that trade (at least not that I know of).
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#32 » by old rem » Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:09 am

Preludepunk27 wrote:
endlessraine wrote:You guys should get it right. GSw would go any trade with the Nets. We wouldn't want Yi, there's a reason why he's getting moved around. The only trade that Gsw would do is a Lopez for AR swap. We need bigs and centers, no need for another guard. And for the Jackson trade, we had to do it because he is killing the team chemistry and players actually wanted him gone. If you guys really want an 8 footers, go talk to Houston about packaging Lopez, Harris,Williams and a future first for Yao.


That is honestly the funniest thing I've seen all year and it's December. A top 5 center in the East at 21 years old for a guy, though with a ton of upside, that we can only hope can become a stud. The only time you made a trade like that is when you're trading a big contract for expirings or young players. Since they're both in their rookie deal, that's hilarious to even try to comprehend.

This has nothing to do with being greedy, that's just fact.

All Nets fans admit we lucked out totally with nabbing GSW's future 1st, but if they feel they're gonna get a guy like Lopez for Randolph, they need to wake up.


Uh.....that wasn't the point. The point was that B Lopez is the only thing the Nets have to offer for Randolph. GSW does not want Yi,does not need guards. Nobody from GSW has been talking about trading for Brook Lopez,there's just nothing else that would be worth trading AR for.
CENSORED... No comment.
NetsForce
Banned User
Posts: 20,711
And1: 29
Joined: Dec 27, 2006

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#33 » by NetsForce » Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:48 pm

I wasn't serious with my Sean Williams trade but now I'm offended... So how about Sean Williams for Anthony Morrow :D!?
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#34 » by old rem » Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:32 am

NetsForce wrote:I wasn't serious with my Sean Williams trade but now I'm offended... So how about Sean Williams for Anthony Morrow :D!?
You haven't waived Sean Williams yet? :dontknow: :dontknow:
CENSORED... No comment.
dantian
Starter
Posts: 2,015
And1: 27
Joined: Jun 23, 2005

Re: Anthony Randolph on the Block 

Post#35 » by dantian » Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:07 am

As a Suns fan who just watched a couple of GS games, I'd have a real hard time to grasp why Nets would want to get rid of Yi for Randolph. Maybe Yi's injury history is bothersome?

Return to Brooklyn Nets