FFDL [draft starts this Saturday!]

theman · Post #1061 » by **theman** » Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:14 pm

Offer sent.

writersblock · Post #1062 » by **writersblock** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:06 am

writersblock wrote:HUGE CONFIRMATION OF SAID HUGE TRADE ANNOUNCEMENT

Sorry, I was supposed to drop Hansbrough immediately with this deal. I've been busy today.

writersblock · Post #1063 » by **writersblock** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 10:22 pm

can someone please add Shaq and drop Hansbrough?

Post #1064 » by **Young_Star11** » Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:00 pm

Stanford proved his mettle this week with a 5-4 win over Blake, but Blake clear-cut won his categories, and if it hadn't been for perhaps a poor shooting week, he could have stolen the win. Whilst he is a clear-cut favorite, he is by no means unbeatable...at least to some.

We are then looking at a three-way tie for third place, AlciG, Carl and Zamir all with up-and-down all aligning themselves with the league elite.

Brian continues to stay in sixth position, and holds a 2.5 game lead on the chasers.

I lead that group, but have theman and George breathing down my neck. I won't last, but the other two are on the way back.

Note - some figures quoted in here may be wrong, as Y! had some problems calculating stats :-?

writersblock · Post #1065 » by **writersblock** » Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:34 pm

Young_Star11 wrote:Stanford proved his mettle this week with a 5-4 win over Blake, but Blake clear-cut won his categories, and if it hadn't been for perhaps a poor shooting week, he could have stolen the win. Whilst he is a clear-cut favorite, he is by no means unbeatable...at least to some.

We are then looking at a three-way tie for third place, AlciG, Carl and Zamir all with up-and-down all aligning themselves with the league elite.

Brian continues to stay in sixth position, and holds a 2.5 game lead on the chasers.

I lead that group, but have theman and George breathing down my neck. I won't last, but the other two are on the way back.

Note - some figures quoted in here may be wrong, as Y! had some problems calculating stats

Losing Landry last week was a bigger loss than people might think for me. He was carrying me in points and FG%. I would have had a 5-4 win, at least, with Landry. Praying he comes back soon.

I'm also interested to see how a healthy Matador team will do. Louis williams is back, let's see if he can regain his top 10 form, Barbosa is shooting for this weekend. Hamilton is day to day. I don't think I'll have a problem holding down 6th, but I'd like to see my team make a move for 3rd, where I think I belong.

Post #1066 » by **CFan21** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:08 am

It looks like the league equilibrium is finally in place with everyone just about where they should be at this point (although I did think this was the year east would finally break through). The Invincibles is really hoping for at least 10-12 wins out of these next two weeks because we're going to be entering undoubtedly our toughest stretch of the season in weeks 11-15. Here's hoping for a speedy recovery from Granger.

hamncheese · Post #1067 » by **hamncheese** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:17 am

writersblock wrote:
Losing Landry last week was a bigger loss than people might think for me. He was carrying me in points and FG%. I would have had a 5-4 win, at least, with Landry. Praying he comes back soon.

At best, you might have won 5-4. I won points by 101, so I don't think in the almost 2 games you lost from Landry, that he would've made that up for you. fg% maybe, but unlikely, since I won .466 to .431, so I don't think Landry was that big of a loss. It might be different if you had him out for the whole week.

Post #1068 » by **Young_Star11** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:46 am

My team is already undermanned, and insfo will be in this week's matchup right up to his eyeballs.

After this, I have: WB, ham, AlciG, Carl, Blake, theman in six consecutive weeks. I wouldn't be favored in any matchup...

writersblock · Post #1069 » by **writersblock** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:56 am

hamncheese wrote:
writersblock wrote:
Losing Landry last week was a bigger loss than people might think for me. He was carrying me in points and FG%. I would have had a 5-4 win, at least, with Landry. Praying he comes back soon.

At best, you might have won 5-4. I won points by 101, so I don't think in the almost 2 games you lost from Landry, that he would've made that up for you. fg% maybe, but unlikely, since I won .466 to .431, so I don't think Landry was that big of a loss. It might be different if you had him out for the whole week.

Except, that Landry is one of my top FGA guys, and he shoots well...so FG% was actually likely. You passed me in FG% after he went down.

Post #1070 » by **CFan21** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:00 am

Somebody call the wambulance for this crybaby. Looks like the crushing loss to Ole CFan was the straw that broke the camel's back. WB is in full nosedive folks!

hamncheese · Post #1071 » by **hamncheese** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:58 pm

writersblock wrote:
hamncheese wrote:At best, you might have won 5-4. I won points by 101, so I don't think in the almost 2 games you lost from Landry, that he would've made that up for you. fg% maybe, but unlikely, since I won .466 to .431, so I don't think Landry was that big of a loss. It might be different if you had him out for the whole week.

Except, that Landry is one of my top FGA guys, and he shoots well...so FG% was actually likely. You passed me in FG% after he went down.

Actually, likely not. I'm making up the numbers, but suppose your team was 182 for 420 for .433 for the week. And let's say Landry was to have gone 25/40 (.625), which is extremely generous. That would've given you 207/460 or .450 for the week, so Landry wouldn't have made a difference there. (Yeah, that's right. I can actually do math.)

theman · Post #1072 » by **theman** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:28 pm

hamncheese wrote:
Actually, likely not. I'm making up the numbers, but suppose your team was 182 for 420 for .433 for the week. And let's say Landry was to have gone 25/40 (.625), which is extremely generous. That would've given you 207/460 or .450 for the week, so Landry wouldn't have made a difference there. (Yeah, that's right. I can actually do math.)

Barbie wrote:Math is too hard. Let's go shopping.

writersblock · Post #1073 » by **writersblock** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:44 pm

hamncheese wrote:
writersblock wrote:
hamncheese wrote:At best, you might have won 5-4. I won points by 101, so I don't think in the almost 2 games you lost from Landry, that he would've made that up for you. fg% maybe, but unlikely, since I won .466 to .431, so I don't think Landry was that big of a loss. It might be different if you had him out for the whole week.

Except, that Landry is one of my top FGA guys, and he shoots well...so FG% was actually likely. You passed me in FG% after he went down.

Actually, likely not. I'm making up the numbers, but suppose your team was 182 for 420 for .433 for the week. And let's say Landry was to have gone 25/40 (.625), which is extremely generous. That would've given you 207/460 or .450 for the week, so Landry wouldn't have made a difference there. (Yeah, that's right. I can actually do math.)

If I shot 460 shots for the week...frankly, I haven't counted, and I don't feel like doing so. I'll just remain with my stubborn position that sans Landry, I lost. But losing 4-5 isn't that big of a deal. I mean, Carl's Juniors couldn't do better against my team.

BTW...I'm trading Shaq. If anyone wants Shaq on the cheap...draft pick, etc., send me an offer.

Post #1074 » by **CFan21** » Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:45 pm

You'll take nothing and like it. Have fun winning the consolation playoffs again.

Post #1075 » by **CFan21** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 5:01 am

Finally I've come up with an adequate alternate team name for The Invincibles.

writersblock · Post #1076 » by **writersblock** » Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:01 pm

Setterlund wrote:You'll take nothing and like it. Have fun winning the consolation playoffs again.

Merry Christmas to you too Carl. :roll:

bww78 · Post #1077 » by **bww78** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:06 am

Merry Christmas to all you bunch of meatheads.

Post #1078 » by **CFan21** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 5:47 am

writersblock wrote:Merry Christmas to you too Carl.

**** you too. Happy Festivus to everyone but WB.

writersblock · Post #1079 » by **writersblock** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 5:34 pm

Setterlund wrote:
**** you too. Happy Festivus to everyone but WB.

Just another reason why some people just aren't mature enough to be in this league. :roll:

Post #1080 » by **CFan21** » Thu Dec 24, 2009 11:56 pm

Young_Star11 wrote:My team is already undermanned, and insfo will be in this week's matchup right up to his eyeballs.

After this, I have: WB, ham, AlciG, Carl, Blake, theman in six consecutive weeks. I wouldn't be favored in any matchup...

You think you've got it rough. Coming up after sly: AlciG, Kohanz, YS, Stanford then B-dub all in a row. At least well find out what my team is made of.