ImageImageImageImageImage

Tracy McGrady (Threads Merging)

Moderators: Rich Rane, NyCeEvO

brook_11
Freshman
Posts: 97
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 21, 2009

Tracy McGrady (Threads Merging) 

Post#1 » by brook_11 » Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:00 pm

So, looks like the Rockets do want to trade Tmac. I definitely think we need him. I mean, what do we lose with him around? he´s an expiring contract, will provide a lot of help on the offensive side, will lessen the double doubles on Brook, and could play a position that we lack: SF. Imagine a lineup of Brook, YI, Tmac, Lee and Harris. What do you guys think and what kind of package would you give for him?
I suggest expiring contracts. I dont believe the Rockets will get the same value in return from any team in the nba, so if we put together expirings, plus a future draft pick, we might have a chance.
NJ To BK
Sophomore
Posts: 153
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 29, 2009

Re: Tmac 

Post#2 » by NJ To BK » Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:03 pm

Simmons+Hassell+Dallas Pick
halfHAVOC
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,864
And1: 176
Joined: Jul 19, 2006
Contact:
 

Re: Tmac 

Post#3 » by halfHAVOC » Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:48 pm

yeah but he would stunt the growth of CDR or Lee just by getting minutes because there would def be issues if he wasn't a starter. I mean if Lee was fine with coming off the bench thats cool i dont see him as a starter in the NBA anyway.
Stream My New Basketball Anthem "KING": https://ampl.ink/7QwkY
SteveNets15
Starter
Posts: 2,335
And1: 6
Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Location: NJNETS

Re: Tmac 

Post#4 » by SteveNets15 » Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:39 pm

Tmac should go back to Orlando.I mean i would give them Hassel and Simmons if that worked but noway are they getting a draft pick.
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

Re: Tmac 

Post#5 » by jeff1624 » Tue Dec 29, 2009 4:53 pm

No need to include a 1st rounder.

Bobby Simmons, Trenton Hassel, Sean Williams and a 2nd rounder.

They're all expiring, they get a 2nd pick and a player that could give them defense off the bench in Hassell. I would Swap Simmons with Alston but I'm not too sure they want him back.
Dat Leadership
Preludepunk27
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,650
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: New Hampshire

Re: Tmac 

Post#6 » by Preludepunk27 » Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:25 pm

Houston is most likely gonna want to add depth in my opinion. I know tmac USED TO BE lights out, but if Houston thinks they're gonna get any young players of big value from a team, they're crazy. I'd totally do the trade Jeff1624 suggested obviously. I'm open to offering a heavily protected future pick (say lottery protected 2011, top 7 protected 2012, unprotected 2013) if push comes to shove. I know I've said a few times on the board I think the Nets will move Dallas's pick, I do not believe THIS is the deal we should use.

I'd would trade for Tmac though. We'd consolidate our salary and roster spots. That'd open us up to possibly doing another trade where we take on more players. I'm rambling, but this would give us more flexibility. Hey if TMac is half the man he was, a few years ago (holding my breathe, but still) I would be open to signing him to an MLE-type deal (because we won't get the MLE this year right since we're under the cap? I thought that's how it worked) to be our 6th man or 2nd-3rd scorer.
Image
Rockice_8
Banned User
Posts: 1,673
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 21, 2007

Re: Tmac 

Post#7 » by Rockice_8 » Tue Dec 29, 2009 6:52 pm

IDK lets just play this season out it makes no sense to trade any picks for him. Plus why would he want to come here. Someone might give up a late 1st and an expiring to make a run at a title thats where he should go.
S.I.C. GM
Veteran
Posts: 2,939
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 31, 2002

Re: Tmac 

Post#8 » by S.I.C. GM » Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:37 pm

I agree with Rock.

Only reason why you trade for Tmac is to get more cap room. Any trade shouldnt include any of our young guys or draft picks. Najera has to be in the deal. If a deal was to done just trading contracts, Tmac wouldnt even get suited up. I would buy him out or sit him out for the rest of the year. There was already a rumor that he didnt want to come here.

All honesty I dont see this working in any way. Why trade VC for his cousin that hasnt played if it isnt for more cap room.
SIC
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

Re: Tmac 

Post#9 » by jeff1624 » Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:47 pm

^^Insurance is paying 80% of his contract.
Dat Leadership
deviljets7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,536
And1: 29
Joined: Feb 16, 2005

Re: Tmac 

Post#10 » by deviljets7 » Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:22 am

If you really wanted to bring in a washed up all-star in a desperate attempt to bring in fans, you could have just signed Iverson for a lot less.

Any deal that doesn't involve Najera is likely a waste of time and money.
enetric wrote:You have the perfect fat% to sit on your butt, eat crap and WATCH someone else do it though. Hell, at that body fat% you might be a starter.
orecchio14
Freshman
Posts: 58
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 23, 2009

T-MAC AND HIS $23 MIL EXPIRING 

Post#11 » by orecchio14 » Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:25 pm

Any chance the Nets can swindle a deal that would land us a one year rental on this guy (whose contract would come off the books next season)?
Not a bad idea for team looking for capspace; but would ownership want to eat the remainder of that contract??
User avatar
jeff1624
RealGM
Posts: 25,127
And1: 1,076
Joined: Jan 19, 2005
Location: NYC
Contact:
   

Re: T-MAC AND HIS $23 MIL EXPIRING 

Post#12 » by jeff1624 » Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:51 pm

I've already stated that a Hassell, Simmons, Battie deal would work. They do it because it gives them more flexibility now that the expirings are divied in 3. they could make other deals including those 3 contracts to land guys like Butler, Hamilton or whoever else they want.

We do it because it gives us another scoring option as we avoid ending up with the worse record ever.
Dat Leadership
Preludepunk27
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,650
And1: 1
Joined: Jun 26, 2005
Location: New Hampshire

Re: T-MAC AND HIS $23 MIL EXPIRING 

Post#13 » by Preludepunk27 » Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:42 pm

Tonight is the 2nd night this season we're starting our actual starting 5 from opening night. I think we'll win 10 games, but this season is pretty brutal right now. As long as we don't give up young guys or anything better than expirings and 2nd rounders, I'm ok with bringing Tmac here. We'll still probably have the worst record in basketball and line ourselves up for the best chance at #1 (worst case would be #4 right? I thought 3 worst teams can't fall any lower than 3 picks below where they were supposed to pick based on records). If we feel we'll possibly screw up landing a top 3 pick, then I'll pass on Tmac haha.
Image
crazykidd2k6
Pro Prospect
Posts: 942
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 17, 2005
Contact:

Re: Tracy McGrady (Threads Merging) 

Post#14 » by crazykidd2k6 » Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:46 pm

Only way were bringing up T-Mac here is if they take Najera's contract.
sup

Return to Brooklyn Nets