Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- Cold Crush 24
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,978
- And1: 151
- Joined: Nov 25, 2007
- Location: Major Goolsby's
- Contact:
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,411
- And1: 6,406
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
Big loss.
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- Cold Crush 24
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,978
- And1: 151
- Joined: Nov 25, 2007
- Location: Major Goolsby's
- Contact:
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
Both teams are hurting. If we can win big on the boards we might be able to squeek this one out. Im a hardcore optimist though.
Finals in 2017
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 61,337
- And1: 26,841
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
Bayless v. Potsie.......The Rose Garden Rumble!
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,712
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- WEFFPIM
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,521
- And1: 473
- Joined: Nov 14, 2005
- Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
Dynamic loss
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 61,337
- And1: 26,841
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
I'm actually pretty excited about the game (low standards I know). As DennisRodman posted yesterday, go back and watch quarters 2-4 of the Phoenix game. There were signs of the "Redd-less" team that started the season.
Portland plays small ball. Oden, Przzy, Outlaw. All gone. Rudy's gone.
Bogut should have a field day.
LRMAM should bother Roy.
To me it comes down to whether or not Ersan can bother Aldridge and we can prevent both Miller or Bayless from going off in some manner.
Portland plays small ball. Oden, Przzy, Outlaw. All gone. Rudy's gone.
Bogut should have a field day.
LRMAM should bother Roy.
To me it comes down to whether or not Ersan can bother Aldridge and we can prevent both Miller or Bayless from going off in some manner.
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,159
- And1: 12
- Joined: Jun 16, 2009
- Location: In the Snow.
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
Loss. Bucks will look bad tonight. Portland is playing much better than when we beat them at the BC.
Trade S. Jackson soon. NJ seems like a nice place for him.
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- LUKE23
- RealGM
- Posts: 72,411
- And1: 6,406
- Joined: May 26, 2005
- Location: Stunville
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
Don't blow this one Bucks. Start JA and Delfino and play them 40+ minutes. We need this one.
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- blkout
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,689
- And1: 1,914
- Joined: Dec 12, 2005
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
I hate working nights. Now I'm wide awake and somehow have to sleep before the game.
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- PDXKnight
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,291
- And1: 2,740
- Joined: May 29, 2007
- Location: Portland
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
Guys, just a heads up, Rudy may be coming back tonight, but there's no guarantee. These are two tough teams. Portland's making the best of a tough situation, but they've lost 3 of the last 4. The Bucks lost Redd, but if the early season is any indication, you guys are just fine without him. It should be interesting to see a matchup of two rising stars in Roy and Jennings. Both of these guys have a knack for taking over games. Roy is mr. consistent while Jennings has been slightly less consistent, but both players are unstoppable when they're hitting shots.
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- emunney
- RealGM
- Posts: 61,020
- And1: 38,030
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: where takes go to be pampered
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
Don't want to kick Redd while he's down, but he was absolutely killing us. I think we're back to being a +.500 team without him. This is a winnable game and we need to win it.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- wichmae
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,726
- And1: 1,031
- Joined: Feb 22, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
Epic loss by more than 20
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,829
- And1: 1,571
- Joined: Aug 06, 2005
- Location: Underground King
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- Bernman
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,133
- And1: 5,985
- Joined: Aug 05, 2004
- Location: Into the Great White Nothing
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
paulpressey25 wrote:There were signs of the "Redd-less" team that started the season.
Signs of a Redd-less team, or the honeymoon effect created by the loss of perceived key player that causes a team's members to play especially motivated and together, only to be replaced by a normal energy level and selfishness at a later point. They actually had a double honeymoon effect going with Skiles being sidelined also. Portland won @ Dallas, @ San Antonio, and against Denver; in their first 3 games where both Oden and Przy were absent. Now they've lost 3 of 4, since the realities of playing with Juwan Howard as their center has set in. Did winning initially without Oden and Przy mean they were a better team without those two guys? Honeymoon effect is a very real and prevalent phenomenon. Now, Redd was no Oden/Przy to our team, but the reality is we're going nowhere with this crap talent squad. We likely won't be able to even take advantage of the honeymoon effect because of the caliber of opponents in combination with playing on the road.
"TRADE GIANNIS" - Magic Giannison
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,644
- And1: 223
- Joined: Jun 30, 2006
- Location: FL by way of Seattle and Milwaukee
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
This game, like most others this season will hinge on the shooting percentage for the Bucks. If they're hitting their jumpers they usually win. If not they lose. Man it would be nice to have one player who you could count on to hit wide open jumpers or a slasher when the shots aren't falling.
Sneaky Pete wrote:In Disgiuse.
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,797
- And1: 2,612
- Joined: Mar 25, 2006
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
I think we get destroyed
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,015
- And1: 26,555
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
Admirals got their asses kicked already. I'm hoping the Bucks can have the same happen.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
- AussieBuck
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,855
- And1: 20,033
- Joined: May 10, 2006
- Location: Bucks in 7?
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
I'm going to miss the game so I'm predicting a win.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,773
- And1: 430
- Joined: Jul 02, 2003
- Location: Milwaukee
Re: Bucks v. Blazers 9 p.m. FSNWI
Loss, this really is a brutal road trip.
NotYoAvgNBAFan wrote:I overlook foolishness.