Battier, Landry, top 10 protected 1st for Martin
Done.
Trade Martin? No!
Re: Trade Martin? No!
- Nicky Nix Nook
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,672
- And1: 153
- Joined: Nov 13, 2008
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Martin? No!
- Draino
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,872
- And1: 14
- Joined: Jan 09, 2005
-
Re: Trade Martin? No!
For some weird weird reason.... since last year I've been having this great feeling of seeing Chris Bosh in a Kings uniform... don't know how, whether its through free agency or trade... ive just had the feeling forever

Re: Trade Martin? No!
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,031
- And1: 135
- Joined: Jan 11, 2007
Re: Trade Martin? No!
Battier , LANDRY & a top 10 protected pick is not nearly enough for K-MART
Re: Trade Martin? No!
- SacTownKings4Life
- Starter
- Posts: 2,276
- And1: 118
- Joined: Jan 18, 2006
- Location: Sacramento, CA
- Contact:
Re: Trade Martin? No!
Nicky Nix Nook wrote:Battier, Landry, top 10 protected 1st for Martin
Done.
Can you say "Grand Theft"? No thanks...
Just
B Cuz


B Cuz
Re: Trade Martin? No!
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 36
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jan 10, 2010
Re: Trade Martin? No!
Nicky Nix Nook wrote:Battier, Landry, top 10 protected 1st for Martin
Done.
Norway mang, Martin is damaged goods. Houston gets shafted on that deal. Maybe something like Dalembert for Martin straight up would be fairer but Sixers don't need s SG when they have superior wings in Iggy and Young.
Re: Trade Martin? No!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,052
- And1: 7,862
- Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Re: Trade Martin? No!
peltoff wrote:Nicky Nix Nook wrote:Battier, Landry, top 10 protected 1st for Martin
Done.
Norway mang, Martin is damaged goods. Houston gets shafted on that deal. Maybe something like Dalembert for Martin straight up would be fairer but Sixers don't need s SG when they have superior wings in Iggy and Young.
Only took you 1 post to destroy any credibility you would have had here. Good job.
Re: Trade Martin? No!
-
- Ballboy
- Posts: 36
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jan 10, 2010
Re: Trade Martin? No!
rpa wrote:peltoff wrote:Nicky Nix Nook wrote:Battier, Landry, top 10 protected 1st for Martin
Done.
Norway mang, Martin is damaged goods. Houston gets shafted on that deal. Maybe something like Dalembert for Martin straight up would be fairer but Sixers don't need s SG when they have superior wings in Iggy and Young.
Only took you 1 post to destroy any credibility you would have had here. Good job.
You're looking at the sitation as a homer Kings fan.
Re: Trade Martin? No!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,052
- And1: 7,862
- Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Re: Trade Martin? No!
peltoff wrote:You're looking at the sitation as a homer Kings fan.
No, I'm looking at you being a dumbass saying that Dalembert for Martin is more fair than that trade. Teams won't even give up an expiring contract for Dalembert--he's THAT bad.
Re: Trade Martin? No!
- Nicky Nix Nook
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 8,672
- And1: 153
- Joined: Nov 13, 2008
- Contact:
-
Re: Trade Martin? No!
peltoff wrote:Nicky Nix Nook wrote:Battier, Landry, top 10 protected 1st for Martin
Done.
Norway mang, Martin is damaged goods. Houston gets shafted on that deal. Maybe something like Dalembert for Martin straight up would be fairer but Sixers don't need s SG when they have superior wings in Iggy and Young.

Take that trade to Trades and Transactions board and see how long it takes to get locked bud.
Re: Trade Martin? No!
- darkadun
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 956
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 14, 2008
- Location: Caprica
Re: Trade Martin? No!
I wouldn't mind having landry at all.
Sometimes you just have to look yourself in the mirror and say....Tyreke Evans.
That just happened.
That just happened.