Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
Moderators: bisme37, Froob, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, canman1971, shackles10, snowman
Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
I love Paul and all, but should we start thinking about the future. We don't want be stuck in another rebuild mode for 20 years. The C's were too sentimental in the early 90's and kept the big 3 and it cost us.

Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,172
- And1: 58
- Joined: Mar 31, 2009
- Location: Israel, Jerusalem
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
He is still worth his contract for this year and the next. Afterwards we sign him for an MLE type of deal and then we wont be stuck and still keep our Franchize player. If Pierce decides he wants too much money after he expires then fine, dont sign him him but unless thats the case he will retire a Celtic...

Kobe>Jordan>God wrote:I'm starting to suspect that Rivers isn't even a real doctor.
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,930
- And1: 3,428
- Joined: Jun 06, 2006
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
It will be a sad day if we ever trade Paul
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
- BRUNiNHO91
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,422
- And1: 23,552
- Joined: Mar 04, 2009
- Location: Rio De Janeiro, Brasil...
-
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
Paul Pierce will retire in Celtic green.
But dang..I'm glad Cfan isn't our GM..he would have traded the whole damn team by now.
But dang..I'm glad Cfan isn't our GM..he would have traded the whole damn team by now.

♣ WHAT THEY GON’ SAY NOW? ‎♣ THANK YOU TRUTH! ♣
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
Come on guy's your being too sentimental. Indiana offered a pretty sweet package for Larry Bird back in the day which we should have taken. I forget everyone involved, but I know the C's would have gotten Chris Mullin in it.
A lot of Red Sox fans were chanting for Mike Lowell to be resigned now look at him. All the while I was chanting for them to throw money A-rods way. Lowell now looks like a broken down old man and we had to watch the Spankees have a parade.
A lot of Red Sox fans were chanting for Mike Lowell to be resigned now look at him. All the while I was chanting for them to throw money A-rods way. Lowell now looks like a broken down old man and we had to watch the Spankees have a parade.

Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,533
- And1: 850
- Joined: Feb 17, 2008
-
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
No. I don't see any reason to trade Pierce at this time. Ray should be the only starter on the block this season. Having said that, I have no problem entertaining any trade scenarios during the off-season.
I brings the ruckus to the ladies!
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
Anybody know if Paul has final approval in where he goes if traded?

Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
- canman1971
- Senior Mod - Celtics
- Posts: 14,949
- And1: 8,991
- Joined: May 13, 2003
- Location: 18 Championship BLVD
-
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
This is just nonsense. He is not getting traded. Ray Allen is not getting traded. Garnett is not getting traded. This is not even worth discussing because it has zero chance of happening.
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
canman1971 wrote:This is just nonsense. He is not getting traded. Ray Allen is not getting traded. Garnett is not getting traded. This is not even worth discussing because it has zero chance of happening.
Its not about whether its going to happen. Its about should we start thinking about it.

Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,345
- And1: 1,478
- Joined: Jul 19, 2004
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
If we are stuck in a rebuilding mode for another 20 years it will hardly be PP's fault. The Lakers were able to avoid rebuilding without trading away Magic or Kareem.. OTOH other teams have traded away a ton of talent and are STILL rebuilding.
Management has to do its job to stay competitive.
Management has to do its job to stay competitive.
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
GuyClinch wrote:If we are stuck in a rebuilding mode for another 20 years it will hardly be PP's fault. The Lakers were able to avoid rebuilding without trading away Magic or Kareem.. OTOH other teams have traded away a ton of talent and are STILL rebuilding.
Management has to do its job to stay competitive.
Well the Lakers aren't like other teams. They get things handed to them.
The Celtics will still have KG and Ray plus what we would be getting in a trade. Then in the offseason Ray will sign for cheaper or we can sign someone else. Its might be time to reload not rebuild.

Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,597
- And1: 8,077
- Joined: Jan 13, 2005
- Location: TD Garden
-
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
cfan79 wrote:Come on guy's your being too sentimental. Indiana offered a pretty sweet package for Larry Bird back in the day which we should have taken. I forget everyone involved, but I know the C's would have gotten Chris Mullin in it.
Maybe I am being too sentimental. But..
this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdCMU3MfX_U
is better than any player we could have gotten for bird.
Paul Pierce, like bird will retire in green with a smile.
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
Celtics_Champs wrote:
Maybe I am being too sentimental. But..
this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdCMU3MfX_U
is better than any player we could have gotten for bird.
Paul Pierce, like bird will retire in green with a smile.
We could have still done that. Its not a written rule that someone has to retire with you to get their number retired. Look at Robert Parish, one of our best centers ever. He went on to play with Charlotte and got another ring while sitting on the bench for the Bulls.

Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,597
- And1: 8,077
- Joined: Jan 13, 2005
- Location: TD Garden
-
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
There is nothing more I hate in sports than watching guys end their careers on different teams, sometimes crappy, to finish it out.
Favre on the Jets and Vikings--bleh
Montana on the chiefs--ugh
Even reggie on the celtics, I was kinda for it, but that just would not have been right.
Favre on the Jets and Vikings--bleh
Montana on the chiefs--ugh
Even reggie on the celtics, I was kinda for it, but that just would not have been right.
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
Celtics_Champs wrote:There is nothing more I hate in sports than watching guys end their careers on different teams, sometimes crappy, to finish it out.
Favre on the Jets and Vikings--bleh
Montana on the chiefs--ugh
Even reggie on the celtics, I was kinda for it, but that just would not have been right.


Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,725
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jan 11, 2005
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
Ok, lets start thinking about it, what deal do you think could be out there that you would consider for PP?
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
- cfan79
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,784
- And1: 74
- Joined: Sep 27, 2003
- Location: Haverhill, MA
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
Hemingway wrote:Ok, lets start thinking about it, what deal do you think could be out there that you would consider for PP?
I'm not sure, it depends on if Paul has to have approval. If he doesn't I'd trade him to the team that has the best offer with a young star and expirings. Kings, Pacers and Warriors might be options, but they all stink at the moment.

Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,533
- And1: 850
- Joined: Feb 17, 2008
-
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
Hemingway wrote:Ok, lets start thinking about it, what deal do you think could be out there that you would consider for PP?
Well, there are probably a dozen or more deals that I would consider. The question is how realistic they actually are.
I would trade all three of Pierce, Garnett & Allen for LeBron. (obviously this doesn't work financially) But I'm sure there are plenty of other guys I would take in return for PP either straight up or in some kind of 2-for-1 package.
I brings the ruckus to the ladies!
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,530
- And1: 430
- Joined: Jul 03, 2003
- Location: Member of Celtic Nation since '64
-
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
Who are the we in we ?
If it's those that matter......hell no.

If it's those that matter......hell no.

WE ARE CELTIC NATION
17 TITLES, ON TO #18.
17 TITLES, ON TO #18.
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
- canman1971
- Senior Mod - Celtics
- Posts: 14,949
- And1: 8,991
- Joined: May 13, 2003
- Location: 18 Championship BLVD
-
Re: Should we think about trading Paul Pierce?
cfan79 wrote:canman1971 wrote:This is just nonsense. He is not getting traded. Ray Allen is not getting traded. Garnett is not getting traded. This is not even worth discussing because it has zero chance of happening.
Its not about whether its going to happen. Its about should we start thinking about it.
OK then, how about this?
NO.