How much of a RB's success should be credited to the OL?

Moderator: bwgood77

CBS7
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,564
And1: 4,191
Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Location: Dallas

How much of a RB's success should be credited to the OL? 

Post#1 » by CBS7 » Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:02 pm

I'd say the majority.
User avatar
Basketball Jesus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,180
And1: 7
Joined: Sep 04, 2003
Location: P-nuts + hair doos

 

Post#2 » by Basketball Jesus » Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:16 pm

Compelling argument you make.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#3 » by J.Kim » Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:22 pm

It's a two-way street.

A crap RB can look a great O-Line look only marginally good, and a great RB can look a mediocre O-Line look phenomenal, and Vice Versa.

Denver's system has repeatedly shown us that a good system (cut once and run) with great blocking up front can generate production out of just about any back.
But then you have a counter argument in someone with transcendent abilities like a Barry Sanders or a Walter Payon or a Jim Brown, who can make a mediocre line look better than it is because of their abilities of making defenders whiff on tackles.
And then you also have a guy like LenDale White, (who despite everyone saying that he's a productive talent), who makes the Titans' O-Line look actually worse than it is because of his lack of explosiveness and a low-end top speed that makes gaps close up before he can even get there.

It's hard to actually credit much success to either the O-Line or the RB, and the amount depends from a strategical point of view. But make no mistake, it's not a one-sided "RB deserves all the credit", "O-Line deserves all the credit" type of thing. Ever.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 106,656
And1: 41,251
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:01 pm

It's a good question to bring up after Chester Taylor just got done carving up Oakland. He's a fine running back but you wonder how much of Peterson's ridiculous numbers are because of that left side of Birk, Hutchinson and McKinnie.
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 53,778
And1: 10,231
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

 

Post#5 » by HMFFL » Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:46 pm

The OL is suppose to get credit?

Normally a great offensive line makes the running back, but the running back still needs to have skills or be a power runner to bulldoze the defenders.

I believe anyone could run behind Minnesota's line.
User avatar
Manhattan Project
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 39,524
And1: 8,218
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Location: The game ain't in me no more. None of it.

 

Post#6 » by Manhattan Project » Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:49 pm

Lets throw out a few examples...

Ahman Green when he was with the Green Bay Packers.
Tiki Barber with the New York Giants.
Priest Holmes l Larry Johnson with the Chiefs.
Mike Anderson l Quentin Griffin l Clinton Portis l Olindis Gary with the Broncos.
Marshawn Lynch with the Bills this year.
Jazz: Under reconstruction, we'll be back.
C- Maluach l Jackson l Hayes
PF- Okongwu l Newell l Salaun
SF- Wiggins l Bryant l McNeeley
SG- Thomas l Wallace l Nembhard
PG- Murray l Collier l Dillingham
J.Kim
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 10,689
And1: 23
Joined: Jan 12, 2003
Location: Washington D.C.

 

Post#7 » by J.Kim » Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:11 pm

Manhattan Project wrote:Lets throw out a few examples...

Ahman Green when he was with the Green Bay Packers.
Tiki Barber with the New York Giants.
Priest Holmes l Larry Johnson with the Chiefs.
Mike Anderson l Quentin Griffin l Clinton Portis l Olindis Gary with the Broncos.
Marshawn Lynch with the Bills this year.


What do you mean by these?
DaGoodz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,186
And1: 1
Joined: Nov 14, 2004
Location: RAWRRRR

 

Post#8 » by DaGoodz » Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:18 pm

I have to say a lot, considering the Giants had Tiki Barber last year and people thought he made our Oline look better than it was. And without Tiki, we are actually gaining more Rushing yards. Its a two way street, cause you also need a RB who has good vision and can find the running lanes. (Hence Reggie Bush's problem)
User avatar
Manhattan Project
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 39,524
And1: 8,218
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Location: The game ain't in me no more. None of it.

 

Post#9 » by Manhattan Project » Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:22 pm

J.Kim wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



What do you mean by these?


Just throwing random examples to discuss whether its the line or running back that deserves credit.

Ahman Green (2000-2004). Was this because of his talent or an extremely dominant line he was running behind? Averaging 4.3 ypc to 5.3 ypc through those years.

Tiki Barber (2002-2006) Before this year everyone was talking about how the Giants were going to be a lost cause because of his loss. However they have made Brandon Jacobs, Derrick Ward and Reuben Droughns look impressive.

Priest Holmes (2001-2003) One of the most dominant running backs since Marshal Faulk in these years. He goes from back up running back to biggest star.

Larry Johnson (2005-2006) Emerged as one of the elite running backs, however the Chiefs line has started to deteriorate. He has come back to earth a bit, however that is also due to teams stacking the box.

Denver Broncos (Since TD) There system has produced running backs every year. However only Clinton Portis has really done anything else where. Gary Flopped, Anderson became a FB, Griffin has done nothing and well Bell never put anything together.

Marshawn Lynch is running behind the biggest offensive line in football, but scouts rave about his ability. Who really deserves the credit here more?
Jazz: Under reconstruction, we'll be back.
C- Maluach l Jackson l Hayes
PF- Okongwu l Newell l Salaun
SF- Wiggins l Bryant l McNeeley
SG- Thomas l Wallace l Nembhard
PG- Murray l Collier l Dillingham
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,948
And1: 19,766
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

 

Post#10 » by NO-KG-AI » Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:09 pm

I think you just have to look at it in a case by case thing. You can't give all the credit to one side until you watch and see what is really happening.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
nesta
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,986
And1: 242
Joined: Jun 20, 2005

 

Post#11 » by nesta » Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:02 am

not all. look at barry sanders, vick

Return to The General NFL Board